IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hop/hopeec/v49y2017i4p537-574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Introduction of Human Capital Theory into Education Policy in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Holden
  • Jeff Biddle

Abstract

Prior to 1958, “human capital†was little more than a suggestive phrase in economics and played no role in discussions of education policy. Within five years, there was an active theoretical and empirical human capital research program in economics. Over the same period, the new idea of public spending on education as a form of investment with a demonstrably high rate of return, and the capacity to contribute to the achievement of important national goals, was enthusiastically communicated to the public by opinion leaders, policymakers, and even a president. This paper discusses two reasons why the human capital idea so rapidly came to influence education policy: (1) the human capital idea implied that policies promoting education could advance goals—first faster economic growth, then poverty reduction—that circumstances pushed to the top of the nation’s policy agenda during the period of human capital theory’s initial development; and (2) an advocate of the theory who could persuasively explain the logic and the emerging empirical evidence linking education to those goals moved into a position of power and influence. We also suggest that this episode marks the beginning of, and was a contributing factor to, a profound transformation of the public discourse surrounding education policy in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Holden & Jeff Biddle, 2017. "The Introduction of Human Capital Theory into Education Policy in the United States," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 537-574, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:49:y:2017:i:4:p:537-574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi-org.proxy.lib.duke.edu/10.1215/00182702-4296305
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:49:y:2017:i:4:p:537-574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Center for the History of Political Economy Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.dukeupress.edu/Catalog/ViewProduct.php?viewby=journal&productid=45614 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.