IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hop/hopeec/v48y2016i4p733-740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mises and Montaigne: A Comment

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Bagus
  • David Howden
  • Amadeus Gabriel
  • Eva María Carrasco Bañuelos

Abstract

Did Ludwig von Mises err in attributing the idea that “no man profits but by the loss of another†to Michel de Montaigne, as Casto Martín Montero Kuscevic and Marco Antonio del Río Rivera claim? In this brief comment we vindicate Mises's assessment and criticisms of Montaigne by way of three points. First, Mises was indeed correct in christening the belief that the economy can be presented as a zero-sum game as the “Montaigne dogma.†Second, we demonstrate that Montaigne refers not only to involuntary exchanges but also to voluntary ones. Finally, we show that Mises considers cases beyond their strict monetary results and refers to entrepreneurial profits as being primarily psychic in nature. As a result, Mises is able to offer an explanation for why forced transactions create no net benefit, but voluntary ones cannot be interpreted in the same way.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Bagus & David Howden & Amadeus Gabriel & Eva María Carrasco Bañuelos, 2016. "Mises and Montaigne: A Comment," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 48(4), pages 733-740, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:48:y:2016:i:4:p:733-740
    DOI: 10.1215/00182702-3687331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-3687331
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1215/00182702-3687331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:48:y:2016:i:4:p:733-740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Center for the History of Political Economy Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.dukeupress.edu/Catalog/ViewProduct.php?viewby=journal&productid=45614 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.