The Meaning of Replication and the Science of Economics
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Michael A. Clemens, 2017.
"The Meaning Of Failed Replications: A Review And Proposal,"
Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 326-342, February.
- Clemens, Michael A., 2015. "The Meaning of Failed Replications: A Review and Proposal," IZA Discussion Papers 9000, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Vegard Iversen & Richard Palmer-Jones & Kunal Sen, 2013.
"On the Colonial Origins of Agricultural Development in India: A Re-examination of Banerjee and Iyer, 'History, Institutions and Economic Performance',"
Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(12), pages 1631-1646, December.
- Vegard Iversen & Richard Palmer-Jones & Kunal Sen, 2012. "On the colonial origins of agricultural development in India: a re-examination of Banerjee and Iyer, ‘History, institutions and economic performance’," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 17412, GDI, The University of Manchester.
- Andrea Salanti, 2013. "Between the Scylla of Whig history and the Charybdis of methodological vacuum," Chapters, in: Marcel Boumans & Matthias Klaes (ed.), Mark Blaug: Rebel with Many Causes, chapter 14, pages 191-207, Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Ankel-Peters, Jörg & Fiala, Nathan & Neubauer, Florian, 2023.
"Is economics self-correcting? Replications in the American Economic Review,"
Ruhr Economic Papers
1005, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
- Ankel-Peters, Jörg & Fiala, Nathan & Neubauer, Florian, 2023. "Is Economics Self-Correcting? Replications in the American Economic Review," I4R Discussion Paper Series 68, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
- Mirowski, Philip, 1995. "Three ways to think about testing in econometrics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 25-46, May.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:23:y:1991:i:1:p:123-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Center for the History of Political Economy Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.dukeupress.edu/Catalog/ViewProduct.php?viewby=journal&productid=45614 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.