IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlmpe/1823068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Multimodal Transport in China Based on Hesitation Fuzzy Multiattribute Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Han
  • Min Wan
  • Yu Zhou

Abstract

Intermodal transportation, as an efficient form of transport organization, is a key technology and means for the logistics industry to balance transport costs and efficiency. How to deeply analyze the key factors constraining the level of development of multimodal transportation in China, building multimodal transportation development evaluation index system and evaluation model, evaluating comprehensively the multimodal transportation development level in China, and putting forward targeted countermeasures is of great practical significance. Based on the hesitant fuzzy multiattribute decision-making method, this paper analyzes the key factors influencing the level of multimodal transportation development from the perspective of sea-rail intermodal transport and further uses the interval number discretization and likelihood deviation maximization multiattribute decision-making method to construct a mixed-data index evaluation model, which is combined with data from 11 provinces (cities) in China. The study shows that there is a big gap among different provinces (cities) in China concerning the level of multimodal transportation development. Besides, the volume of intermodal container transportation and railway mileage are the core factors affecting the level of multimodal transportation development, and the results of the evaluation model can objectively reflect the level of multimodal transportation development and problems in each province (city). The research results further enrich the theoretical system of intermodal transportation development and provide a reference for the relevant management departments in formulating intermodal transportation plans and policies by putting forward pertinent suggestions in the field of management. In the future, the research direction should include the ecological environment, economic benefits, and other indicators into the evaluation system, expand the research scope of the modes of combined transportation such as public rail transport and public air transport, and improve the applicable scope of the evaluation model and the evaluation capability of specific scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Han & Min Wan & Yu Zhou, 2020. "Evaluation of Multimodal Transport in China Based on Hesitation Fuzzy Multiattribute Decision-Making," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-9, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:1823068
    DOI: 10.1155/2020/1823068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2020/1823068.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2020/1823068.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2020/1823068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu, Mengyuan & Perez, Edgar Jimenez & Mason, Keith & He, Yin, 2024. "Fractal assessment analysis of China's air-HSR network integration," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Mehdi Zarehparast Malekzadeh & Francisco Enrique Santarremigia & Gemma Dolores Molero & Ashwani Kumar Malviya & Rosa Arroyo & Tomás Ruiz Sánchez, 2023. "A Methodological Framework Based on a Quantitative Assessment of New Technologies to Boost the Interoperability of Railways Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Yanxia Wang & Yisong Li & Changxiang Lu, 2023. "Evaluating the Effects of Logistics Center Location: An Analytical Framework for Sustainable Urban Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:1823068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.