IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/soaktu/v34y2015i2p85-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The European Union’s Myanmar Policy: Focused or Directionless?

Author

Listed:
  • Jörn Dosch
  • Jatswan S. Sidhu

Abstract

What is the European Union (EU) trying to achieve in Myanmar? Is the EU speaking with one voice and acting collectively (and does it really matter)? Were the sanctions lifted too early? These are some of the key questions surrounding the current role of the EU in relation to Myanmar. A close analysis of the EU’s Myanmar policy demonstrates that, while clearly driven by normative convictions, the EU’s approach and posture vis-à-vis Myanmar since 1988 has been more reactive than carefully planned and strategised. Whereas in the period from 1988 until early 2011 the EU’s Myanmar policy frequently fluctuated between a “carrot” and a “stick” approach, depending on the circumstances, since 2011 the emphasis has been on carrots, which signifies an important shift in the application of normative power. The EU has generously provided large amounts of aid intended mainly to assist Myanmar in its transition. This approach does not seem to factor in the possibility of backward steps and is based on a scenario of ongoing, linear political and economic reforms. This optimism is shared by both the European Commission and most EU member states. However, the similar perceptions and compatible normative foundations on which their policies are based have so far not translated into well-coordinated and coherent strategies and development cooperation programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jörn Dosch & Jatswan S. Sidhu, 2015. "The European Union’s Myanmar Policy: Focused or Directionless?," Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 34(2), pages 85-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:gig:soaktu:v:34:y:2015:i:2:p:85-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jsaa/article/view/842/874
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Butterworth & Pamela Dale, 2010. "Articulations of Local Governance in Timor-Leste," World Bank Publications - Reports 30533, The World Bank Group.
    2. World Bank, 2005. "East Asia Decentralizes : Making Local Government Work," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7492.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Graça Feijó, 2015. "Timor-Leste: The Adventurous Tribulations of Local Governance after Independence," Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 34(1), pages 85-114.
    2. Lorena Viñuela, 2014. "Trends and Quality of Decentralized Public Investment," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1407, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    3. Thulstrup, Andreas Waaben, 2015. "Livelihood Resilience and Adaptive Capacity: Tracing Changes in Household Access to Capital in Central Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 352-362.
    4. Tao Kong, 2007. "A Selective Review of Recent Developments in the Economic Growth Literature," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 21(1), pages 1-33, May.
    5. Yukon Huang & Alessandro Magnoli Bocchi, 2009. "Reshaping Economic Geography in East Asia," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2590.
    6. David Butterworth, 2010. "Expanding State, Expectant Citizens : Local Perspectives on Government Responsibility in Timor-Leste," World Bank Publications - Reports 10940, The World Bank Group.
    7. Herbert Werlin, 2012. "Governance or Democracy," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 86-113.
    8. Smoke, Paul, 2016. "Looking Beyond Conventional Intergovernmental Fiscal Frameworks: Principles, Realities, and Neglected Issues," ADBI Working Papers 606, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    9. Arsenio M. Balisacan & Hal Hill & Sharon Faye A Piza, 2006. "Regional Development Dynamics and Decentralization in the Philippines: Ten Lessons from a 'Fast Starter'," Departmental Working Papers 2006-14, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    10. Muhammad Hussain Malik, 2008. "Fiscal decentralization for poverty reduction in Asia: opportunities, challenges and policy issues," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 15(2), pages 13-33, December.
    11. Joseph J. Capuno, 2010. "Leadership and Innovation under Decentralization : A Case Study of Selected Local Governments in the Philippines," UP School of Economics Discussion Papers 201010, University of the Philippines School of Economics.
    12. World Bank, 2007. "China : Improving Rural Public Finance for the Harmonious Society," World Bank Publications - Reports 7664, The World Bank Group.
    13. World Bank, 2004. "Decentralization in the Philippines : Stgrengthening Local Government Financing and Resource Management in the Short Term," World Bank Publications - Reports 14412, The World Bank Group.
    14. Miral, Emmanuel Jr., 2017. "Federalism: Prospects for the Philippines," Discussion Papers DP 2017-29, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    15. Kent Eaton & Kai Kaiser & Paul J. Smoke, 2011. "The Political Economy of Decentralization Reforms : Implications for Aid Effectiveness," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2336.
    16. Joseph J. Capuno & Maria Melody S. Garcia, 2009. "What difference can performance ratings make? Difference-in-difference estimates of impact on local government responsiveness in the Philippines," UP School of Economics Discussion Papers 200908, University of the Philippines School of Economics.
    17. Hassan F. Gholipour & Amir Arjomandi, 2022. "Economic policy responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic and growth of nonperforming loans," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 551-566, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:soaktu:v:34:y:2015:i:2:p:85-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marco Bünte or Howard Loewen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.