IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/chaktu/v43y2014i1p213-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The KMT–CCP Forum: Securing Consent for Cross-Strait Rapprochement

Author

Listed:
  • André Beckershoff

Abstract

The recent rapprochement between China and Taiwan cannot be understood if our conceptual apparatus is unable to cope with the distinctive new quality of cross-Strait relations. A critical framework provides a transnational account of cross-Strait dynamics. An analysis of the KMT–CCP Forum through the lens of the neo-Gramscian notion of hegemony sheds light on the Forum’s strategies, mechanisms, practices and instruments to secure consent for cross-Strait rapprochement. While this mode of governance has broadened the KMT’s strategic options, it has also compromised Taiwanese democracy.

Suggested Citation

  • André Beckershoff, 2014. "The KMT–CCP Forum: Securing Consent for Cross-Strait Rapprochement," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 43(1), pages 213-241.
    • Handle: RePEc:gig:chaktu:v:43:y:2014:i:1:p:213-241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jcca/article/view/728
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bieling, Hans-Jürgen, 2011. "Varieties of Capitalism, Regulationstheorie und neogramscianische IPÖ: Komplementäre oder gegensätzliche Perspektiven des globalisierten Kapitalismus?," ZÖSS-Discussion Papers 23, University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS).
    2. Gunter Schubert, 2010. "Cross-Strait Integration – A New Research Focus in the Taiwan Studies Field," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 39(1), pages 3-10.
    3. Gill,Stephen, 1991. "American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521424332, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin Young & Stefano Pagliari, 2017. "Capital united? Business unity in regulatory politics and the special place of finance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 3-23, March.
    2. James Lawson, 2022. "Mounting Turbulence in Neoliberal Globalization: Political Economy, Populist Discourse, and Policy in Alberta, Canada," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-30, May.
    3. Alex Faria & Marcus Hemais, 2021. "Transmodernizing Management Historiographies of Consumerism for the Majority," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 447-465, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:chaktu:v:43:y:2014:i:1:p:213-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Karsten Giese or Heike Holbig (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.