IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v5y2024i1p4-78d1319927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the Effect of Scientific Background on University Students’ Environmental Views

Author

Listed:
  • Eleftheria Fytopoulou

    (Department of Forestry and Management of Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace, 193 Pantazidou Street, 68 200 Orestiada, Greece)

  • Evangelia Karasmanaki

    (Department of Forestry and Management of Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace, 193 Pantazidou Street, 68 200 Orestiada, Greece)

  • Georgios Tsantopoulos

    (Department of Forestry and Management of Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace, 193 Pantazidou Street, 68 200 Orestiada, Greece)

Abstract

Creating an environmentally aware society is not an easy task and requires knowledge about what affects the formation of environmental views. At the same time, to contribute to environmental protection, individuals with different educational backgrounds need to have environmental awareness, because their decisions as future professionals may affect the environment. The problem, however, is that there is not adequate research on the association between educational background and environmental views. To address this gap, the aim of this study is to investigate whether scientific background affects environmental views and attitudes. Specific objectives are to examine whether scientific background affects university students’ views on environmental issues as well as their attitudes towards the solution to environmental problems. To achieve this aim, a comparative study was performed on two student groups: students attending environmental studies and students attending classical studies. The results showed that non-environmental students were less willing to change their habits to protect the environment and to participate in environmental actions compared to environmental students who expressed a pronounced willingness to do so. However, both student groups did not acknowledge their personal environmental responsibility. Categorical regression revealed that students’ certain sociodemographic variables affected their willingness to change habits. However, other additional variables are recommended to be analyzed in future studies. The results from this study provide support for making changes in the curricula of non-environmental departments and for carrying out actions to reinforce the participation of students in initiatives aimed at raising environmental awareness.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleftheria Fytopoulou & Evangelia Karasmanaki & Georgios Tsantopoulos, 2024. "Comparing the Effect of Scientific Background on University Students’ Environmental Views," World, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:5:y:2024:i:1:p:4-78:d:1319927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/5/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/5/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan, Qingmei & Yasmeen, Humaira & Ali, Sharafat & Ismail, Hina & Zameer, Hashim, 2023. "Fintech development, renewable energy consumption, government effectiveness and management of natural resources along the belt and road countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farrukh Nawaz Kayani & Ismat Nasim & Khalil Abu Saleem, 2024. "Analyzing the Impact of Governance, Environment and Trade on Inward FDI: A Case of Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam from ASEAN," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 523-534, March.
    2. Li, Aihong & Li, Shuyan & Chen, Shuai & Sun, Xiaoqin, 2024. "The role of Fintech, natural resources, and renewable energy consumption in Shaping environmental sustainability in China: A NARDL perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Nam Thanh Vu & Hung Quang Bui & Tuan Anh Pham & Duc Hong Vo, 2024. "Fintech development and environmental sustainability: Does income inequality matter?," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 350-369, June.
    4. Xu, Jie & Chen, Fu & Zhang, Weiwei & Liu, Yiting & Li, Tingting, 2023. "Analysis of the carbon emission reduction effect of Fintech and the transmission channel of green finance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    5. Liu, Tong & Lan, Bo, 2024. "On the conflict of natural resources abundance and export upgrading in upper-middle and high-income countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Jin, Guangzhu & Huang, Zhenhui, 2024. "Resource curse or resource boon? Appraising the mediating role of fin-tech in realizing natural resources-green growth nexus in MENA region," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    7. Rehman, Mubeen Abdur, 2024. "How has FinTech become a solution for minerals management?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Zeng, Chunying & Ma, Rong & Chen, Peilin, 2024. "Impact of mineral resource rents and fin-tech on green growth: Exploring the mediating role of environmental governance in developed economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Xia, Aiming & Liu, Qing, 2024. "Modelling the asymmetric impact of fintech, natural resources, and environmental regulations on ecological footprint in G7 countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Wang, Shubin & Li, Jiabao & Zhao, Erlong, 2024. "Exploring the role of financial technologies and digital trade in shaping trade-adjusted resource consumption in E7 countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. He, Xinao & Zhang, Chaowen, 2024. "Does mineral resource dependency distinctly impede financial access, depth, and efficiency? The mediating role of digitalization," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Ullah, Farid & Cai, Helen Huifen & Yuan, Qiong & Ul-Haq, Jabbar, 2024. "Plenty of resources and energy security risk nexus: Evidence from BRICS economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    13. Li, Taoying & Peng, Mengyin & Zhang, Jianjiang & Zheng, Long & Chen, Qiang, 2024. "Legal environment and natural resource dependence: The role of fintech and green innovation in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Thomas Puschmann & Valentyn Khmarskyi, 2024. "Green fintech: Developing a research agenda," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2823-2837, July.
    15. Lv, Zhaojiang & Chen, Lan & Ali, Syed Ahtsham & Muda, Iskandar & Alromaihi, Abdullah & Boltayev, Jurabek Yusufovich, 2024. "Financial technologies, green technologies and natural resource nexus with sustainable development goals: Evidence from resource abundant economies using MMQR estimation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Chen, Zhonglu & Umar, Muhammad & Su, Chi-Wei & Mirza, Nawazish, 2023. "Renewable energy, credit portfolios and intermediation spread: Evidence from the banking sector in BRICS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 561-566.
    17. Han, Zhanbing & Heng, Yixin, 2024. "Do fintech and trade diversification discard the natural resource dependency in MENA countries?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    18. Fang, Ming & Chang, Chiu-Lan, 2023. "The impact of oil and natural gas trading and globalization on natural resources management in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    19. Yasmeen, Rizwana & Huang, Haiping & Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan, 2024. "Assessing the significance of FinTech and mineral resource depletion in combating energy poverty: Empirical insights from BRICS economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    20. Liang, Shuai & Wang, Peng & Jia, Cunlu & Zhu, Jialan, 2023. "Studying green financing, factor allocation efficiency, and regional productivity growth in renewable energy industries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 130-139.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:5:y:2024:i:1:p:4-78:d:1319927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.