IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jtourh/v5y2024i4p58-1041d1507982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilience Components in Mexican Whale-Watching Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Iyari Janethzy Espinoza-Rodríguez

    (Centro Universitario de la Costa, Universidad de Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta 48280, Mexico)

  • Rosa María Chávez-Dagostino

    (Centro Universitario de la Costa, Universidad de Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta 48280, Mexico)

  • Gisela Heckel

    (Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Ensenada 22860, Mexico)

Abstract

Whale watching (WW) is a growing tourist activity that is at risk of becoming unsustainable. Legislation regarding WW must mitigate adverse effects on species and address the dynamics of complex systems. This study proposes analyzing this interaction using a socio-ecological resilience framework, considering both social and ecological components. Resilient governance is characterized by four features: flexibility to respond to change, adaptability, multi-level governance, and participation. The aim of this study was to assess how Mexican WW regulations contribute to the resilience of the socio-ecosystem through a literature review on compliance with the regulations and the presence of resilience elements in the regulations. Non-compliance with 12 guidelines was identified, with vessel crowding, distance, and unauthorized vessels being the most frequently reported issues. The analysis of the regulations revealed the presence of all four elements of resilient governance; however, participation is limited to certain key stakeholders, which undermines whale conservation due to non-compliance. In conclusion, the Mexican regulations contribute to resilient governance; however, to ensure whale conservation and socio-ecological resilience, it is essential that all involved parties understand their roles and actively participate in decision-making processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Iyari Janethzy Espinoza-Rodríguez & Rosa María Chávez-Dagostino & Gisela Heckel, 2024. "Resilience Components in Mexican Whale-Watching Regulation," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:5:y:2024:i:4:p:58-1041:d:1507982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/5/4/58/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/5/4/58/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schwoerer, Tobias & Knowler, Duncan & Garcia-Martinez, Salvador, 2016. "The value of whale watching to local communities in Baja, Mexico: A case study using applied economic rent theory," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 90-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mallard, Graham, 2019. "Regulating whale watching: A common agency analysis," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 191-199.
    2. Shannon E Murphy & Ian Campbell & Joshua A Drew, 2018. "Examination of tourists’ willingness to pay under different conservation scenarios; Evidence from reef manta ray snorkeling in Fiji," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Andrés M Cisneros‐Montemayor & Amanda Townsel & Claire M Gonzales & Andrea R Haas & Estrella E Navarro‐Holm & Teresa Salorio‐Zuñiga & Andrew F Johnson, 2020. "Nature‐based marine tourism in the Gulf of California and Baja California Peninsula: Economic benefits and key species," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(2), pages 111-128, May.
    4. Alberto Ansuategi & Duncan Knowler & Tobias Schwoerer & Salvador García-Martínez, 2019. "Local Fishing Communities and Nature-Based Tourism in Baja, México: An Inter-sectoral Valuation of Environmental Inputs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(1), pages 33-52, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:5:y:2024:i:4:p:58-1041:d:1507982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.