IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i8p1299-d105880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Two Soil Fertility Indexes to Evaluate Paddy Fields for Rice Cultivation

Author

Listed:
  • Bahareh Delsouz Khaki

    (Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan (Khorasgan ) Branch, Islamic Azad University, 81551-39998 Isfahan, Iran)

  • Naser Honarjoo

    (Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan (Khorasgan ) Branch, Islamic Azad University, 81551-39998 Isfahan, Iran)

  • Naser Davatgar

    (Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), 3177993545 Karaj, Iran)

  • Ahmad Jalalian

    (Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan (Khorasgan ) Branch, Islamic Azad University, 81551-39998 Isfahan, Iran)

  • Hosein Torabi Golsefidi

    (Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Shahed University, 3319118651 Tehran, Iran)

Abstract

Assessing soil fertility is essential to help identify strategies with less environmental impact in order to achieve more sustainable agricultural systems. The main objective of this research was to assess two soil fertility evaluation approaches in paddy fields for rice cultivation, in order to develop a user-friendly and credible soil fertility index (SFI). The Square-Root method was used as a parametric approach, while the Joint Fuzzy Membership functions as a fuzzy method with adapted criteria definition tables, were used to compute SFI. Results indicated that both of the methods determined the major soil limiting factors for rice cultivation clearly, and soil fertility maps established using GIS (Geographic Information System) could be helpful for decision makers. The coefficients of determination (R2) for the linear regression between the two SFI values and rice yields were relatively high (0.63 and 0.61, respectively). Additionally, the two SFI were significantly correlated to each other ( r = 0.68, p < 0.05). The study results demonstrated that both of the methods provide reliable and valuable information. Compared to the fuzzy method, the procedure of the parametric method is easier but may be expensive and time-consuming. However, the fuzzy method, with carefully chosen indicators, can adequately evaluate soil fertility and provide useful information for decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahareh Delsouz Khaki & Naser Honarjoo & Naser Davatgar & Ahmad Jalalian & Hosein Torabi Golsefidi, 2017. "Assessment of Two Soil Fertility Indexes to Evaluate Paddy Fields for Rice Cultivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:8:p:1299-:d:105880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/8/1299/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/8/1299/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pankaj Kumar Yadav & Anuj Kumar Mandal & Krishna Hari Dhakal, 2021. "Comparative Study Of Evaluation Of Soil Fertility Status In Rice Zone, Morang," Tropical Agroecosystems (TAEC), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 12-25, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:8:p:1299-:d:105880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.