IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i5p830-d98703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of Rural Consumers on the Aspects of Meat Quality and Health Implications Associated With Meat Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Nomasonto M. Xazela

    (Department of Livestock and Pasture Science, University of Fort Hare, P. Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa)

  • Arno Hugo

    (Department of Microbial Biochemical and Food Biotechnology, University of Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)

  • Upenyu Marume

    (School of Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, P. Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa)

  • Voster Muchenje

    (Department of Livestock and Pasture Science, University of Fort Hare, P. Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa)

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the perceptions of rural low-income consumers on meat quality and health issues associated with meat consumption. A total of 466 consumers in the Eastern Cape (EC) Province (South Africa (SA)) were randomly sampled, and principal component analyses (PCA) were used to analyse the data. With regard to purchasing decisions, correlation analysis was performed to establish the relationships between actual scores and mean scores so as to determine purchase motives and decisions. The major purchase point mentioned by all consumers was the supermarket (65%), and the reasons were that this purchase point was the most hygienic and the meat was fresh (35%). The estimated relationship showed a significant association between products consumed at home and the source of income of consumers. With regard to consumption patterns and health issues, most consumers were aware of nutritional balance issues (64%), and most were aware of the health risks associated with meat consumption (59%). It was concluded that consumer perceptions on the meat quality aspects associated with health and consumption patterns are affected by disposable income and cultural background.

Suggested Citation

  • Nomasonto M. Xazela & Arno Hugo & Upenyu Marume & Voster Muchenje, 2017. "Perceptions of Rural Consumers on the Aspects of Meat Quality and Health Implications Associated With Meat Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:5:p:830-:d:98703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/5/830/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/5/830/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malik Orou Seko & Andrée Prisca Ndjoug Ndour & Walter Ossebi & Jasmina Saric & Katharina Kreppel & Daouda Dao & Bassirou Bonfoh, 2020. "Consumer Perception on Purchase Decision Factors and Health Indicators Related to the Quality and Safety of Meat Sold in Dibiteries in Dakar, Senegal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Giuseppe Di Vita & Simone Blanc & Teresina Mancuso & Stefano Massaglia & Giovanni La Via & Mario D’Amico, 2019. "Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-9, July.
    3. Juan García-Díez & Carla Gonçalves & Luca Grispoldi & Beniamino Cenci-Goga & Cristina Saraiva, 2021. "Determining Food Stability to Achieve Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Babatunde Oluwasegun Alao & Andrew Bamidele Falowo & Amanda Chulayo & Voster Muchenje, 2018. "Consumers’ Preference and Factors Influencing Offal Consumption in Amathole District Eastern Cape, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Karolina Macháčková & Jiří Zelený & Daniel Lang & Zbyněk Vinš, 2021. "Wild Boar Meat as a Sustainable Substitute for Pork: A Mixed Methods Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:5:p:830-:d:98703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.