IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i4p655-d96599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Willingness to Adopt Biochar in Agriculture: The Producer’s Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka E. Latawiec

    (Rio Conservation and Sustainability Science Centre, Department of Geography and the Environment, Pontifícia Universidade Católica, 22453-900 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    International Institute for Sustainability, Estrada Dona Castorina 124, 22460-320 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Informatics, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Balicka 116B, 30-149 Kraków, Poland
    School of Environmental Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK)

  • Jolanta B. Królczyk

    (Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Automation, Opole University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Mikołajczyka 5, 45-271 Opole, Poland)

  • Maciej Kuboń

    (Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Informatics, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Balicka 116B, 30-149 Kraków, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Szwedziak

    (Opole University of Technology, Department of Production Engineering and Logistics, Luboszycka 5, 45-036 Opole, Poland)

  • Adam Drosik

    (Department of Social Science, University of Opole, Katowicka 89, 45-061 Opole, Poland)

  • Ewa Polańczyk

    (Opole University of Technology, Department of Production Engineering and Logistics, Luboszycka 5, 45-036 Opole, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Grotkiewicz

    (Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Informatics, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Balicka 116B, 30-149 Kraków, Poland)

  • Bernardo B. N. Strassburg

    (Rio Conservation and Sustainability Science Centre, Department of Geography and the Environment, Pontifícia Universidade Católica, 22453-900 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    International Institute for Sustainability, Estrada Dona Castorina 124, 22460-320 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)

Abstract

Most research on biochar has focused either on the mechanistic or the biophysical aspects, and there has been relatively little research into the social applicability and acceptance of biochar as a soil enhancer in agriculture. However, whether to adopt biochar in their practice is ultimately the farmers’ decision, and their willingness to do so is crucial. Here, we show the producer’s perspective on adopting biochar, using Polish farmers as a case study. Poland is an interesting case study because biochar has only recently attracted the attention of researchers, entrepreneurs, and other stakeholders there. We performed standardized, semi-structured interviews with 161 Polish farmers to evaluate the socioeconomic potential of biochar application in practice. We found that 27% of the respondents claimed to be familiar with biochar. The respondents with a technical, non-agricultural level of education were most familiar with the term ‘biochar’ (36%), followed by the group of respondents with a higher-level agricultural education (31%). It was surprising that among the latter respondents, the majority (69%) did not know the term ‘biochar’, either in the context used for this study or in any other context. Twenty percent of the respondents expressed an interest in using biochar, while 43% were not willing to adopt it in their agricultural practice (37% ‘did not know yet’). If a farmer was familiar with the concept of sustainable agriculture, the probability of familiarity with biochar increased by 16% ( p < 0.05). In addition, farmers interested in using biochar indicated that sustainable agriculture might improve the financial situation of their farms (52%). The perceived benefits of biochar that drive the willingness to adopt it included improved soil quality and increased income due to increased yields, while the constraints on its adoption were associated mainly with high costs. Our results also point to the necessity of information flow as well as engaging farmers in participatory research to adjust the research to their needs. Furthermore, our results highlight the importance of transparency with the farmers and appropriate dissemination and presentation of both the positive and the negative aspects of biochar adoption. We urge those studying biochar to engage in more interdisciplinary research and to go beyond laboratory and field research. Many innovations, even those that work, will not be adopted if socioeconomic considerations are not incorporated into the research.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka E. Latawiec & Jolanta B. Królczyk & Maciej Kuboń & Katarzyna Szwedziak & Adam Drosik & Ewa Polańczyk & Katarzyna Grotkiewicz & Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, 2017. "Willingness to Adopt Biochar in Agriculture: The Producer’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:655-:d:96599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/4/655/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/4/655/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iwona Gruss & Jacek P. Twardowski & Agnieszka Latawiec & Jolanta Królczyk & Agnieszka Medyńska-Juraszek, 2019. "The Effect of Biochar Used as Soil Amendment on Morphological Diversity of Collembola," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Shaheen, Sabry M. & Antoniadis, Vasileios & Shahid, Muhammad & Yang, Yi & Abdelrahman, Hamada & Zhang, Tao & Hassan, Noha E.E. & Bibi, Irshad & Niazi, Nabeel Khan & Younis, Sherif A. & Almazroui, Mans, 2022. "Sustainable applications of rice feedstock in agro-environmental and construction sectors: A global perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. K. M. Atikur Rahman & Dunfu Zhang, 2018. "Effects of Fertilizer Broadcasting on the Excessive Use of Inorganic Fertilizers and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Hannah Larissa Nicholas & Keith H. Halfacree & Ian Mabbett, 2022. "Public Perceptions of Faecal Sludge Biochar and Biosolids Use in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Otte, Pia Piroschka & Vik, Jostein, 2017. "Biochar systems: Developing a socio-technical system framework for biochar production in Norway," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 34-45.
    6. Song, Biao & Almatrafi, Eydhah & Tan, Xiaofei & Luo, Songhao & Xiong, Weiping & Zhou, Chengyun & Qin, Meng & Liu, Yang & Cheng, Min & Zeng, Guangming & Gong, Jilai, 2022. "Biochar-based agricultural soil management: An application-dependent strategy for contributing to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    7. Nicola Dal Ferro & Carlo Camarotto & Ilaria Piccoli & Antonio Berti & Jane Mills & Francesco Morari, 2020. "Stakeholder Perspectives to Prevent Soil Organic Matter Decline in Northeastern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Juan José Martínez-Nicolás & Pilar Legua & Francisca Hernández & Rafael Martínez-Font & Edgardo Giordani & Pablo Melgarejo, 2021. "Effect of Phytoremediated Port Sediment as an Agricultural Medium for Pomegranate Cultivation: Mobility of Contaminants in the Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:655-:d:96599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.