IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i4p557-d95082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on Applying Biomass Fraction for Greenhouse Gases Emission Estimation of a Sewage Sludge Incinerator in Korea: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Seongmin Kang

    (Department of Environment & Energy, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

  • Seungjin Kim

    (Cooperate Course for Climate Change, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

  • Jeongwoo Lee

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

  • Youngjae Jeon

    (Department of Environment & Energy, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

  • Ki-Hyun Kim

    (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Eui-chan Jeon

    (Department of Environment & Energy, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

Abstract

According to the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) guidelines, when calculating CO 2 emissions, CO 2 emissions from biomass should be excluded from the total amount of CO 2 emissions and should be separately reported due to their “carbon neutrality”. Sewage sludge is one of the representative biomass fuels. It is mixed with fossil fuels to achieve greenhouse gas reduction or is used by itself as a fuel to replace fossil fuels. According to the results of this study, biomass fractions of both the sewage sludge and the sewage sludge incineration exhaust gases did not amount to 100%. At present, in many countries (South Korea, Japan, and Germany), when calculating greenhouse gas emissions from sewage sludge incinerators, all CO 2 emissions from sewage sludge are judged to be biomass and only the greenhouse gas emissions that correspond to non-CO 2 gases are calculated as greenhouse gas emissions. However, since, according our results, the content of sewage sludge is not 100% biomass, if CO 2 emissions are excluded according to the existing greenhouse gas emission calculation method, the amount of emissions may be underestimated. Therefore, to accurately calculate greenhouse gas emissions from a sewage sludge incinerator, CO 2 emissions should be calculated in consideration of the fossil carbon fractions of sewage sludge.

Suggested Citation

  • Seongmin Kang & Seungjin Kim & Jeongwoo Lee & Youngjae Jeon & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-chan Jeon, 2017. "A Study on Applying Biomass Fraction for Greenhouse Gases Emission Estimation of a Sewage Sludge Incinerator in Korea: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-7, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:557-:d:95082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/4/557/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/4/557/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seongmin Kang & Joonyoung Roh & Eui-chan Jeon, 2020. "Seasonal Variation Analysis Method of GHG at Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-10, September.
    2. Karolina Wojtacha-Rychter & Piotr Kucharski & Adam Smolinski, 2021. "Conventional and Alternative Sources of Thermal Energy in the Production of Cement—An Impact on CO 2 Emission," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Seongmin Kang & Changsang Cho & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-chan Jeon, 2018. "Fossil Carbon Fraction and Measuring Cycle for Sewage Sludge Waste Incineration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-8, August.
    4. Quetzalli Aguilar-Virgen & Paul Taboada-González & Eduardo Baltierra-Trejo & Liliana Marquez-Benavides, 2017. "Cutting GHG Emissions at Student Housing in Central Mexico through Solid Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, August.
    5. Seongmin Kang & Sungheum Cho & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-chan Jeon, 2019. "Comparison of GHG Emission Methods Calculated by Applying Biomass Fraction at Sewage Sludge Incinerators in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-10, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:557-:d:95082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.