IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i2p85-d89898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring Environmental Quality by Sniffing Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Zhibo Wang

    (International School of Software, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
    School of Software, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Lei Ke

    (International School of Software, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Xiaohui Cui

    (International School of Software, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Qi Yin

    (International School of Software, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Longfei Liao

    (International School of Software, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Lu Gao

    (International School of Software, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Zhenyu Wang

    (International School of Software, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Nowadays, the environmental pollution and degradation in China has become a serious problem with the rapid development of Chinese heavy industry and increased energy generation. With sustainable development being the key to solving these problems, it is necessary to develop proper techniques for monitoring environmental quality. Compared to traditional environment monitoring methods utilizing expensive and complex instruments, we recognized that social media analysis is an efficient and feasible alternative to achieve this goal with the phenomenon that a growing number of people post their comments and feelings about their living environment on social media, such as blogs and personal websites. In this paper, we self-defined a term called the Environmental Quality Index (EQI) to measure and represent people’s overall attitude and sentiment towards an area’s environmental quality at a specific time; it includes not only metrics for water and food quality but also people’s feelings about air pollution. In the experiment, a high sentiment analysis and classification precision of 85.67% was obtained utilizing the support vector machine algorithm, and we calculated and analyzed the EQI for 27 provinces in China using the text data related to the environment from the Chinese Sina micro-blog and Baidu Tieba collected from January 2015 to June 2016. By comparing our results to with the data from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), we showed that the environment evaluation model we constructed and the method we proposed are feasible and effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhibo Wang & Lei Ke & Xiaohui Cui & Qi Yin & Longfei Liao & Lu Gao & Zhenyu Wang, 2017. "Monitoring Environmental Quality by Sniffing Social Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:85-:d:89898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/85/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/85/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos & Ada M. Pérez-Pico & M. Luisa López-Pérez, 2019. "Does Social Network Sentiment Influence S&P 500 Environmental & Socially Responsible Index?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, January.
    2. Lijian Han & Weiqi Zhou & Weifeng Li, 2018. "Growing Urbanization and the Impact on Fine Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-9, May.
    3. Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi, 2023. "Social media in disaster management: review of the literature and future trends through bibliometric analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(2), pages 953-975, September.
    4. Jee Hoon Lee & Jacob Wood & Jungsuk Kim, 2021. "Tracing the Trends in Sustainability and Social Media Research Using Topic Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Yuguo Tao & Feng Zhang & Chunyun Shi & Yun Chen, 2019. "Social Media Data-Based Sentiment Analysis of Tourists’ Air Quality Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Loretta Mastroeni & Maurizio Naldi & Pierluigi Vellucci, 2023. "Who pushes the discussion on wind energy? An analysis of self-reposting behaviour on Twitter," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1763-1789, April.
    7. Shiwei Fan & Lan Xue & Jianhua Xu, 2018. "What Drives Policy Attention to Climate Change in China? An Empirical Analysis through the Lens of People’s Daily," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:85-:d:89898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.