IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i11p1995-d117074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gen2 RFID-Based System Framework for Resource Circulation in Closed-Loop Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Young-woo Kim

    (Department of Industrial Engineering/ASRI (Automation System Research Institute), Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Tai-Woo Chang

    (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering/Intelligence & Manufacturing Research Center, Kyonggi University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16227, Korea)

  • Jinwoo Park

    (Department of Industrial Engineering/ASRI (Automation System Research Institute), Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

Abstract

Product recycling has become a mandatory activity under extended producer responsibility. Therefore, it is important to operate a closed-loop supply chain that integrates sourcing, production, delivery, and recycling to achieve not only environmental sustainability, but also economic benefits. However, this goal is affected by chronic problems caused by uncertainties relating to the return timing, quantity, and quality of returned items. Many studies proved that information visibility could solve these problems. In this context, a system framework for closed-loop supply chain management is proposed that gathers real-time information within a supply chain and product lifecycle by using the Internet-of-Things, including radio frequency identification (RFID). Specifically, the most recent Gen2 RFID protocol, which provides new features to create new positive effects, is considered. Additionally, an information system is designed, including RFID tag encoding, which supports the operation of the proposed system. Finally, the lifecycle benefits are examined, such as counterfeit prevention, real-time monitoring and maintenance in the middle-of-life phase, and reverse process streamlining. The ultimate aim is to design a system that facilitates the profitable and environmentally friendly operation of the closed-loop supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Young-woo Kim & Tai-Woo Chang & Jinwoo Park, 2017. "Gen2 RFID-Based System Framework for Resource Circulation in Closed-Loop Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:1995-:d:117074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/1995/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/1995/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Denno & Thomas Thurman, 2005. "Requirements on information technology for product lifecycle management," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 109-122.
    2. Reid Lifset & Atalay Atasu & Naoko Tojo, 2013. "Extended Producer Responsibility," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 17(2), pages 162-166, April.
    3. Vedran Kordic (ed.), 2008. "Supply Chain," Books, IntechOpen, number 26, January-J.
    4. Krikke, H.R. & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M. & Van Wassenhove, L.N., 2001. "Design of Closed Loop Supply Chains," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-45-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Flavio Tonelli & Steve Evans & Paolo Taticchi, 2013. "Industrial sustainability: challenges, perspectives, actions," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 143-163.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simonetto, Marco & Sgarbossa, Fabio & Battini, Daria & Govindan, Kannan, 2022. "Closed loop supply chains 4.0: From risks to benefits through advanced technologies. A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    2. Changhyun Kim & KwangSup Shin, 2019. "Developing Fair Investment Plans to Enhance Supply Chain Visibility Using Cooperative Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Bartosz Pawłowicz & Marek Kołcz & Piotr Jankowski-Mihułowicz, 2022. "The Idea of RFIDtex Transponders Utilization in Household Appliances on the Example of a Washing Machine Demonstrator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Feng Yang & Kaiyi Wang & Yanyun Han & Zhong Qiao, 2018. "A Cloud-Based Digital Farm Management System for Vegetable Production Process Management and Quality Traceability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taryn Renatta De Mendonca & Yan Zhou, 2019. "Environmental Performance, Customer Satisfaction, and Profitability: A Study among Large U.S. Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Sabbaghi, Mostafa & Behdad, Sara & Zhuang, Jun, 2016. "Managing consumer behavior toward on-time return of the waste electrical and electronic equipment: A game theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 545-563.
    3. Pablo Pérez-Gosende & Josefa Mula & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero, 2020. "Overview of Dynamic Facility Layout Planning as a Sustainability Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Maria Albareda-Sambola & Antonio Alonso-Ayuso & Laureano Escudero & Elena Fernández & Yolanda Hinojosa & Celeste Pizarro-Romero, 2010. "A computational comparison of several formulations for the multi-period incremental service facility location problem," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(1), pages 62-80, July.
    5. Adhikari, Rajendra Prasad & Collins, Ray & Sun, Ximing, 2012. "Segmenting Consumers to Inform Agrifood Value Chain Development in Nepal," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Chavatip Chindavijak & Kongkiti Phusavat & Pekka Kess & Suparerk Sooksamarn, 2016. "Transformation to Enterprise Sustainability Case Studies of Manufacturing and Service Enterprise in Thailand," Managing Innovation and Diversity in Knowledge Society Through Turbulent Time: Proceedings of the MakeLearn and TIIM Joint International Conference 2016,, ToKnowPress.
    7. Morvarid Rahmani & Luyi Gui & Atalay Atasu, 2021. "The Implications of Recycling Technology Choice on Extended Producer Responsibility," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 522-542, February.
    8. Marta Negri & Alessandra Neri & Enrico Cagno & Gabriele Monfardini, 2021. "Circular Economy Performance Measurement in Manufacturing Firms: A Systematic Literature Review with Insights for Small and Medium Enterprises and New Adopters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    9. Ng, Desmond W. & Salin, Victoria, 2012. "An Institutional Approach to the Examination of Food Safety," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, May.
    10. Yan Shen & Zizhao Song & Tian Gao & Ji Ma, 2022. "Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision Making of Power Battery Considering Subsidy Transfer under EPR System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Kyung Sung Jung & Milind Dawande & H. Neil Geismar & V. Daniel R. Guide & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2016. "Supply planning models for a remanufacturer under just-in-time manufacturing environment with reverse logistics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(2), pages 533-581, May.
    12. David F. Drake & Stefan Spinler, 2013. "OM Forum —Sustainable Operations Management: An Enduring Stream or a Passing Fancy?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 689-700, October.
    13. Abdelkader Sbihi & Richard Eglese, 2010. "Combinatorial optimization and Green Logistics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 159-175, March.
    14. Xiaojiao Qiao & Xiukun Zhao & Jinhui Zou, 2021. "Remanufacturing Marketing Decisions in the Presence of Retailing Platforms in the Carbon Neutrality Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Jiří Vyskočil & Petr Douda & Petr Novák & Bernhard Wally, 2023. "A Digital Twin-Based Distributed Manufacturing Execution System for Industry 4.0 with AI-Powered On-The-Fly Replanning Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-27, April.
    16. M. Melo & S. Nickel & F. Saldanha-da-Gama, 2014. "An efficient heuristic approach for a multi-period logistics network redesign problem," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 80-108, April.
    17. Erik G. Hansen & Ferdinand Revellio, 2020. "Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez‐faire," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1250-1273, December.
    18. Işıl & Vishal V. Agrawal & Atalay Atasu, 2020. "Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 364-382, March.
    19. Albachiara Boffelli & Stefano Dotti & Paolo Gaiardelli & Giorgia Carissimi & Barbara Resta, 2019. "Corporate Environmental Management for the Textile Industry: Toward an Empirical Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-25, November.
    20. Tian, Fang & Sošić, Greys & Debo, Laurens, 2020. "Stable recycling networks under the Extended Producer Responsibility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 989-1002.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:1995-:d:117074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.