IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i10p1925-d116244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model to Assess the Quality of Magmatic Rocks for Reliable and Sustainable Constructions

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela Toderaş

    (Mining Engineering, Surveying and Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Mines, University of Petrosani, 20 University Street, 332006 Petrosani, Romania)

  • Roland Iosif Moraru

    (Management and Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Mines, University of Petrosani, 20 University Street, 332006 Petrosani, Romania)

  • Ciprian Danciu

    (Mining Engineering, Surveying and Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Mines, University of Petrosani, 20 University Street, 332006 Petrosani, Romania)

  • Grigore Buia

    (Environmental Engineering and Geology Department, Faculty of Mines, University of Petrosani, 20 University Street, 332006 Petrosani, Romania)

  • Lucian-Ionel Cioca

    (Industrial Engineering and Management Department, Faculty of Engineering, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 10 Victoriei Blv. Street, 550024 Sibiu, Romania
    Academy of Romanian Scientists, Splaiul Independentei, 54, Sector 5, 010071 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Geomechanical assessment of rocks requires knowledge of phenomena that occur under the influence of internal and external factors at a macroscopic or microscopic scale, when rocks are submitted to different actions. To elucidate the quantitative and qualitative geomechanical behavior of rocks, knowing their geological and physical–mechanical characteristics becomes an imperative. Mineralogical, petrographical and chemical analyses provided an opportunity to identify 15 types of igneous rocks (gabbro, diabases, granites, diorites, rhyolites, andesites, and basalts), divided into plutonic and volcanic rocks. In turn, these have been grouped into acidic, neutral (intermediate) and basic magmatites. A new ranking method is proposed, based on considering the rock characteristics as indicators of quantitative assessment, and the grading system, by given points, allowing the rocks framing in admissibility classes. The paper is structured into two parts, experimental and interpretation of experimental data, showing the methodology to assess the quality of igneous rocks analyzed, and the results of theoretical and experimental research carried out on the analyzed rock types. The proposed method constitutes an appropriate instrument for assessment and verification of the requirements regarding the quality of rocks used for sustainable construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela Toderaş & Roland Iosif Moraru & Ciprian Danciu & Grigore Buia & Lucian-Ionel Cioca, 2017. "Model to Assess the Quality of Magmatic Rocks for Reliable and Sustainable Constructions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1925-:d:116244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1925/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1925/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Larisa Ivascu, 2017. "Risk Indicators and Road Accident Analysis for the Period 2012–2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanny Pillajo-Quijia & Blanca Arenas-Ramírez & Camino González-Fernández & Francisco Aparicio-Izquierdo, 2020. "Influential Factors on Injury Severity for Drivers of Light Trucks and Vans with Machine Learning Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Molin Sun & Zhongyi Zheng & Longhui Gang, 2018. "Uncertainty Analysis of the Estimated Risk in Formal Safety Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Thanapong Champahom & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2020. "Methodologies for Determining the Service Quality of the Intercity Rail Service Based on Users’ Perceptions and Expectations in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Zeyang Cheng & Zhenshan Zu & Jian Lu, 2018. "Traffic Crash Evolution Characteristic Analysis and Spatiotemporal Hotspot Identification of Urban Road Intersections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. David M. Goldberg & Sukhwa Hong, 2019. "Minimizing the Risks of Highway Transport of Hazardous Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-10, November.
    6. Lian Zhu & Linjun Lu & Wenying Zhang & Yurou Zhao & Meining Song, 2019. "Analysis of Accident Severity for Curved Roadways Based on Bayesian Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Larisa Ivascu & Muddassar Sarfraz & Muhammad Mohsin & Sobia Naseem & Ilknur Ozturk, 2021. "The Causes of Occupational Accidents and Injuries in Romanian Firms: An Application of the Johansen Cointegration and Granger Causality Test," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Miloš Poliak & Ján Dvorský & Jan Zýka & Elvira Nica, 2023. "Evaluation of a Front Braking Light for Improving Safety in Road Transport," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Beata Skowron-Grabowska & Marta Wincewicz-Bosy & Małgorzata Dymyt & Adam Sadowski & Tomasz Dymyt & Katarzyna Wąsowska, 2022. "Healthcare Supply Chain Reliability: The Case of Medical Air Transport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Dongkwan Lee & Jean-Michel Guldmann & Choongik Choi, 2019. "Factors Contributing to the Relationship between Driving Mileage and Crash Frequency of Older Drivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Yichi Zhang & Xuan Dou & Hanping Zhao & Ying Xue & Jinfan Liang, 2023. "Safety Risk Assessment of Low-Volume Road Segments on the Tibetan Plateau Using UAV LiDAR Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1925-:d:116244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.