IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i10p1809-d114320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Evaluation and Life Cycle Cost Analysis Model of a Gondola-Type Exterior Wall Painting Robot

Author

Listed:
  • Dong-Jun Yeom

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Eun-Ji Na

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Mi-Young Lee

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Yoo-Jun Kim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Young Suk Kim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Chung-Suk Cho

    (Department of Civil, Infrastructure and Environmental Engineering, Khalifa University, P.O. Box 127788, Abu Dhabi L2017E, UAE)

Abstract

The amount and market size of apartment complex exterior wall painting work continues to increase each year in South Korea. Nevertheless, there are difficulties with the supply and demand of human resources due to the high risks associated with conventional painting work. To resolve these issues, research and development has recently been conducted on a Gondola-type Exterior Wall Painting robot (GEWPro). The aims of this study were to develop a performance evaluation and life cycle cost (LCC) analysis model for a GEWPro and deduce its performance and economic efficiency through a case study. According to the results, the performance of the automated method was 16.8% higher than that of the conventional method, and the economic efficiency was also superior (benefit/cost ratio 6.39). These results show that the proposed performance evaluation and LCC analysis model can predict the productivity and economic efficiency of automated methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong-Jun Yeom & Eun-Ji Na & Mi-Young Lee & Yoo-Jun Kim & Young Suk Kim & Chung-Suk Cho, 2017. "Performance Evaluation and Life Cycle Cost Analysis Model of a Gondola-Type Exterior Wall Painting Robot," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1809-:d:114320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1809/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1809/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aysun Özkan & Zerrin Günkaya & Gülden Tok & Levent Karacasulu & Melike Metesoy & Müfide Banar & Alpagut Kara, 2016. "Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Magnesia Spinel Brick Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Remer, Donald S. & Tu, Jerome C. & Carson, Dean E. & Ganiy, Saleem A., 1984. "The state of the art of present worth analysis of cash flow distributions," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 257-278, March.
    3. Erwin M. Schau & Marzia Traverso & Annekatrin Lehmann & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2011. "Life Cycle Costing in Sustainability Assessment—A Case Study of Remanufactured Alternators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(11), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Sherif, Yosef S & Kolarik, William J, 1981. "Life cycle costing: Concept and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 287-296.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hofmann, Christian, 1998. "Investments in modern production technology and the cash flow-oriented EPQ-model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 193-206, January.
    2. Viktoria Mannheim & Weronika Kruszelnicka, 2022. "Energy-Model and Life Cycle-Model for Grinding Processes of Limestone Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Le Thanh Tiep & Ngo Quang Huan & Tran Thi Thuy Hong, 2020. "The Impact of Renewable Energy on Sustainable Economic Growth in Vietnam," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 359-369.
    4. Evan E. Anderson & Yu‐Min Chen, 1988. "A decision support system for the procurement of military equipment," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 619-632, August.
    5. Sergey Fomenko & Sanat Tolendiuly & Ahmet Turan & Adil Akishev, 2022. "Production of Refractory Bricks through Combustion Synthesis from Metallurgical Wastes and the Thermo-Physical Properties of the Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Zahir Barahmand & Marianne S. Eikeland, 2022. "Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Cost Analysis through the Lens of Uncertainty: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Malaquias Zildo António Tsambe & Cássio Florisbal de Almeida & Cássia Maria Lie Ugaya & Luiz Fernando de Abreu Cybis, 2021. "Application of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment to Used Lubricant Oil Management in South Brazilian Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. K. Koppiahraj & S. Bathrinath & V. G. Venkatesh & Venkatesh Mani & Yangyan Shi, 2023. "Optimal sustainability assessment method selection: a practitioner perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 629-662, May.
    9. Muhammad Rauf Shaker & Mayurkumar Bhalala & Qayoum Kargar & Byungik Chang, 2020. "Evaluation of Alternative Home-Produced Concrete Strength with Economic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Anna Maria Ferrari & Lucrezia Volpi & Martina Pini & Cristina Siligardi & Fernando Enrique García-Muiña & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2019. "Building a Sustainability Benchmarking Framework of Ceramic Tiles Based on Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-30, January.
    11. Haritha Saranga & U. Kumar, 2006. "“Optimization of aircraft maintenance/support infrastructure using genetic algorithms—level of repair analysis”," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 91-106, March.
    12. Nuri Cihat Onat & Murat Kucukvar & Anthony Halog & Scott Cloutier, 2017. "Systems Thinking for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: A Review of Recent Developments, Applications, and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-25, April.
    13. Vivek Arulnathan & Mohammad Davoud Heidari & Maurice Doyon & Eric P. H. Li & Nathan Pelletier, 2022. "Economic Indicators for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Going beyond Life Cycle Costing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    14. Mohamed Abubakr & Adel T. Abbas & Italo Tomaz & Mahmoud S. Soliman & Monis Luqman & Hussien Hegab, 2020. "Sustainable and Smart Manufacturing: An Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Saccani, Nicola & Perona, Marco & Bacchetti, Andrea, 2017. "The total cost of ownership of durable consumer goods: A conceptual model and an empirical application," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 1-13.
    16. Anna Schulte & Daniel Maga & Nils Thonemann, 2021. "Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Circularity Assessment to Analyze Environmental Impacts of the Medical Remanufacturing of Electrophysiology Catheters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    17. Remer, Donald S. & Nieto, Armando P., 1995. "A compendium and comparison of 25 project evaluation techniques. Part 1: Net present value and rate of return methods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 79-96, November.
    18. Meylan, Grégoire & Ami, Helen & Spoerri, Andy, 2014. "Transitions of municipal solid waste management. Part II: Hybrid life cycle assessment of Swiss glass-packaging disposal," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 16-27.
    19. Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská, 2018. "Houses Based on Wood as an Ecological and Sustainable Housing Alternative—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Jan Pešta & Tereza Pavlů & Kristina Fořtová & Vladimír Kočí, 2020. "Sustainable Masonry Made from Recycled Aggregates: LCA Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1809-:d:114320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.