IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i10p1726-d113261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Infiltration and Soil Loss Changes during the Growing Season under Ploughing and Conservation Tillage

Author

Listed:
  • Gergely Jakab

    (Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Geographical Institute, 1112 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Balázs Madarász

    (Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Geographical Institute, 1112 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Judit Alexandra Szabó

    (Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Geographical Institute, 1112 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Adrienn Tóth

    (Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Geographical Institute, 1112 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Dóra Zacháry

    (Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Geographical Institute, 1112 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Zoltán Szalai

    (Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Geographical Institute, 1112 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Ádám Kertész

    (Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Geographical Institute, 1112 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Jeremy Dyson

    (Syngenta Crop Protection AG, 40002 Basel, Switzerland)

Abstract

Decreased water retention and increased runoff and soil loss are of special importance concerning soil degradation of hilly crop fields. In this study, plots under ploughing (conventional) tillage (PT) and conservation tillage (CT; 15 years) were compared. Rainfall simulation on 6 m 2 plots was applied to determine infiltration and soil loss during the growing season. Results were compared with those measured from 1200 m 2 plots exposed to natural rainfalls in 2016. Infiltration was always higher under CT than PT, whereas the highest infiltration was measured under the cover crop condition. Infiltration under seedbed and stubble resulted in uncertainties, which suggests that natural pore formation can be more effective at improving soil drainage potential than can temporary improvements created by soil tillage operations. Soil erodibility was higher under PT for each soil status; however, the seedbed condition triggered the highest values. For CT, soil loss volume was only a function of runoff volume at both scales. Contrarily, on PT plots, some extreme precipitation events triggered extremely high soil loss owing to linear erosion, which meant no direct connection existed between the scales. Improved soil conditions due to conservation practice are more important for decreasing soil loss than the better surface conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gergely Jakab & Balázs Madarász & Judit Alexandra Szabó & Adrienn Tóth & Dóra Zacháry & Zoltán Szalai & Ádám Kertész & Jeremy Dyson, 2017. "Infiltration and Soil Loss Changes during the Growing Season under Ploughing and Conservation Tillage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1726-:d:113261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1726/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1726/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew K. Marondedze & Brigitta Schütt, 2020. "Assessment of Soil Erosion Using the RUSLE Model for the Epworth District of the Harare Metropolitan Province, Zimbabwe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Federico Calcagno & Elio Romano & Nicola Furnitto & Arman Jamali & Sabina Failla, 2022. "Remote Sensing Monitoring of Durum Wheat under No Tillage Practices by Means of Spectral Indices Interpretation: A Preliminary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Peng, Zhengkai & Wang, Linlin & Xie, Junhong & Li, Lingling & Coulter, Jeffrey A. & Zhang, Renzhi & Luo, Zhuzhu & Cai, Liqun & Carberry, Peter & Whitbread, Anthony, 2020. "Conservation tillage increases yield and precipitation use efficiency of wheat on the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Xiangjian Rui & Lei Nie & Yan Xu & Hong Wang, 2019. "Land Degeneration due to Water Infiltration and Sub-Erosion: A Case Study of Soil Slope Failure at the National Geological Park of Qian-an Mud Forest, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Dharmendra Singh & Sangeeta Lenka & Narendra Kumar Lenka & Sudhir Kumar Trivedi & Sudeshna Bhattacharjya & Sonalika Sahoo & Jayanta Kumar Saha & Ashok Kumar Patra, 2020. "Effect of Reversal of Conservation Tillage on Soil Nutrient Availability and Crop Nutrient Uptake in Soybean in the Vertisols of Central India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Juan Antonio Villarreal Sanchez & Lourdes Diaz Jimenez & Jose Concepcion Escobedo Bocardo & Jose Omar Cardenas Palomo & Nereida Elizabeth Guerra Escamilla & Jesus Salvador Luna Alvarez, 2018. "Effect of Marine Microorganisms on Limestone as an Approach for Calcareous Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, June.
    7. Felicia Chețan & Cornel Chețan & Ileana Bogdan & Paula Ioana Moraru & Adrian Ioan Pop & Teodor Rusu, 2022. "Use of Vegetable Residues and Cover Crops in the Cultivation of Maize Grown in Different Tillage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Ádám Rieder & Balázs Madarász & Judit Alexandra Szabó & Dóra Zacháry & Anna Vancsik & Marianna Ringer & Zoltán Szalai & Gergely Jakab, 2018. "Soil Organic Matter Alteration Velocity due to Land-Use Change: A Case Study under Conservation Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, March.
    9. Gábor Timár & Gusztáv Jakab & Balázs Székely, 2024. "A Step from Vulnerability to Resilience: Restoring the Landscape Water-Storage Capacity of the Great Hungarian Plain—An Assessment and a Proposal," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1726-:d:113261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.