IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i1p56-d61916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Grazing Exclusion on Vegetation Characteristics and Soil Organic Carbon of Leymus chinensis Grassland in Northern China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiao Chen

    (State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Haiping Tang

    (State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

Overgrazing has caused vegetation destruction and soil degradation in Leymus chinensis grassland, the widely distributed type of grassland in northern China. To restore the degraded ecosystem, grazing exclusion was implemented in 1979, 1999, and 2004. However, changes in the vegetation and soil organic carbon (SOC) in different years of grazing exclusion have not been thoroughly elucidated. This paper examines the changes in vegetation characteristics ( i.e. , biomass, cover, richness, degree of succession, and shannon diversity index) and SOC under free of grazing (FG), 6 years (6 GE), 11 years (11 GE), and 31 years (31 GE) of grazing exclusion plots in the Xilin River Basin, China. The results indicate that the vegetation characteristics and SOC increased during the restoration process. Both the vegetation characteristics and SOC in 6 GE did not differ significantly from FG ( p > 0.05), while these indexes in 11 GE were significantly higher than in FG. The differences between the vegetation characteristics and SOC in 11 GE and those in 31 GE were not significant. To meet the tradeoff between ecosystem conservation and utilization, further studies with multi-year observation should be conducted to identify the optimal duration of grazing exclusion and the grazing exclusion time threshold in L. chinensis grassland. This study provides valuable insights into sustainable grassland management in northern China.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiao Chen & Haiping Tang, 2016. "Effect of Grazing Exclusion on Vegetation Characteristics and Soil Organic Carbon of Leymus chinensis Grassland in Northern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:56-:d:61916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/1/56/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/1/56/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Ying & Peth, Stephan & Krümmelbein, Julia & Horn, Rainer & Wang, Zhongyan & Steffens, Markus & Hoffmann, Carsten & Peng, Xinhua, 2007. "Spatial variability of soil properties affected by grazing intensity in Inner Mongolia grassland," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 241-254.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiang Liu & Haiyan Sheng & Zhaoqi Wang & Zhiwen Ma & Xiaotao Huang & Lanhai Li, 2020. "Does Grazing Exclusion Improve Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks in Alpine Grasslands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau? A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Liqun Shao & Haibin Chen & Chen Zhang & Xuexi Huo, 2017. "Effects of Major Grassland Conservation Programs Implemented in Inner Mongolia since 2000 on Vegetation Restoration and Natural and Anthropogenic Disturbances to Their Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yuhui & Zhou, Guangsheng & Jia, Bingrui, 2008. "Modeling SOC and NPP responses of meadow steppe to different grazing intensities in Northeast China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 72-78.
    2. Chen, Jun & Shiyomi, Masae & Morita, Satoru, 2023. "Phytomass productivity of cutting and grazing grasslands with special reference to small-scale spatial variation in plant nutrient resources," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    3. Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed & Lulu Hou & Ruirui Yan & Xiaoping Xin & Yousif Mohamed Zainelabdeen, 2020. "The Joint Effect of Grazing Intensity and Soil Factors on Aboveground Net Primary Production in Hulunber Grasslands Meadow Steppe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Moret-Fernández, D. & Pueyo, Y. & Bueno, C.G. & Alados, C.L., 2011. "Hydro-physical responses of gypseous and non-gypseous soils to livestock grazing in a semi-arid region of NE Spain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(12), pages 1822-1827, October.
    5. Saldaña, A. & Ibáñez, J.J., 2007. "Pedodiversity, connectance and spatial variability of soil properties, what is the relationship?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 342-352.
    6. Deepak Singh & Alok Kumar Mishra & Sridhar Patra & Anuj Kumar Dwivedi & Chandra Shekhar Prasad Ojha & Vijay P. Singh & Sankar Mariappan & Subhash Babu & Nisha Singh & Devideen Yadav & Prabhat Ranjan O, 2023. "Effect of Long-Term Tillage Practices on Runoff and Soil Erosion in Sloping Croplands of Himalaya, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Yunqing Hao & Zhengwei He, 2019. "Effects of grazing patterns on grassland biomass and soil environments in China: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:56-:d:61916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.