IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v6y2014i8p5463-5475d39413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goal and Scope in Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis: The Case of Hydrogen Production from Biomass

Author

Listed:
  • Milena Stefanova

    (Life Cycle Assessment and Ecodesign Laboratory—ENEA (Italian National Agency for new Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development), via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, Bologna 40129, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Concetta Tripepi

    (Life Cycle Assessment and Ecodesign Laboratory—ENEA (Italian National Agency for new Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development), via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, Bologna 40129, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Alessandra Zamagni

    (Life Cycle Assessment and Ecodesign Laboratory—ENEA (Italian National Agency for new Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development), via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, Bologna 40129, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Paolo Masoni

    (Life Cycle Assessment and Ecodesign Laboratory—ENEA (Italian National Agency for new Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development), via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, Bologna 40129, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The framework for life cycle sustainability analysis (LCSA) developed within the project CALCAS (Co-ordination Action for innovation in Life-Cycle Analysis for Sustainability) is introducing a truly integrated approach for sustainability studies. However, it needs to be further conceptually refined and to be made operational. In particular, one of the gaps still hindering the adoption of integrated analytic tools for sustainability studies is the lack of a clear link between the goal and scope definition and the modeling phase. This paper presents an approach to structure the goal and scope phase of LCSA so as to identify the relevant mechanisms to be further detailed and analyzed in the modeling phase. The approach is illustrated with an on-going study on a new technology for the production of high purity hydrogen from biomass, to be used in automotive fuel cells.

Suggested Citation

  • Milena Stefanova & Concetta Tripepi & Alessandra Zamagni & Paolo Masoni, 2014. "Goal and Scope in Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis: The Case of Hydrogen Production from Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:8:p:5463-5475:d:39413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/8/5463/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/8/5463/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pere Fullana i Palmer & Rita Puig & Alba Bala & Grau Baquero & Jordi Riba & Marco Raugei, 2011. "From Life Cycle Assessment to Life Cycle Management," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(3), pages 458-475, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christina Wulf & Jasmin Werker & Christopher Ball & Petra Zapp & Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs, 2019. "Review of Sustainability Assessment Approaches Based on Life Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-43, October.
    2. Akito Ozawa & Mai Inoue & Naomi Kitagawa & Ryoji Muramatsu & Yurie Anzai & Yutaka Genchi & Yuki Kudoh, 2017. "Assessing Uncertainties of Well-To-Tank Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydrogen Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Nuri Cihat Onat & Murat Kucukvar & Anthony Halog & Scott Cloutier, 2017. "Systems Thinking for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: A Review of Recent Developments, Applications, and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Peter Tarne & Marzia Traverso & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2017. "Review of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment and Potential for Its Adoption at an Automotive Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Eleni Iacovidou & Jonathan Busch & John N. Hahladakis & Helen Baxter & Kok Siew Ng & Ben M. J. Herbert, 2017. "A Parameter Selection Framework for Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat & Tatari, Omer, 2016. "Uncertainty-embedded dynamic life cycle sustainability assessment framework: An ex-ante perspective on the impacts of alternative vehicle options," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 715-728.
    7. Jing Wang & Stephanie D. Maier & Rafael Horn & Robert Holländer & Ralf Aschemann, 2018. "Development of an Ex-Ante Sustainability Assessment Methodology for Municipal Solid Waste Management Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-29, September.
    8. Mijoh A. Gbededo & Kapila Liyanage, 2018. "Identification and Alignment of the Social Aspects of Sustainable Manufacturing with the Theory of Motivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Pauline Deutz & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2015. "From Theory to Practice: Enhancing the Potential Policy Impact of Industrial Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Romain Debref, 2012. "The Paradoxes of Environmental Innovations: The Case of Green Chemistry," Post-Print hal-02047209, HAL.
    2. Thornton, PK & Schuetz, T & Förch, W & Cramer, L & Abreu, D & Vermeulen, S & Campbell, BM, 2017. "Responding to global change: A theory of change approach to making agricultural research for development outcome-based," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 145-153.
    3. Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Mariana Ferraz & Cláudia Echevenguá Teixeira & Henrique Rozenfeld, 2016. "The Deployment of Product-Related Environmental Legislation into Product Requirements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Dhanush Dinesh & Robert B. Zougmore & Joost Vervoort & Edmond Totin & Philip K. Thornton & Dawit Solomon & Paresh B. Shirsath & Valerien O. Pede & Isabel Lopez Noriega & Peter Läderach & Jana Körner &, 2018. "Facilitating Change for Climate-Smart Agriculture through Science-Policy Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Alejandra Balaguera & Jaume Alberti & Gloria I. Carvajal & Pere Fullana-i-Palmer, 2021. "Stabilising Rural Roads with Waste Streams in Colombia as an Environmental Strategy Based on a Life Cycle Assessment Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:8:p:5463-5475:d:39413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.