IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i4p332-d67682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Deployment of Product-Related Environmental Legislation into Product Requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela C. A. Pigosso

    (Section of Engineering Design and Product Development, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet, Building 426, Kongens Lyngby 2800, Denmark)

  • Mariana Ferraz

    (Nucleous of Advanced Manufacturing, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of São Paulo, Avenida Trabalhador São Carlense, 400, São Carlos SP 13566-590, Brazil)

  • Cláudia Echevenguá Teixeira

    (Institute for Technological Research of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Almeida Prado, 532, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo SP 05508-901, Brazil)

  • Henrique Rozenfeld

    (Nucleous of Advanced Manufacturing, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of São Paulo, Avenida Trabalhador São Carlense, 400, São Carlos SP 13566-590, Brazil)

Abstract

Environmental legislation is increasingly changing its focus from manufacturing-oriented to product-oriented instruments. Compliance with product-related environmental legislation is achieved by the incorporation of environmental requirements into the early phases of the product development process (PDP). Nevertheless, the deployment of product-related environmental legislation into product requirements is still a challenge. This study followed an inductive approach to propose a guideline to support the identification, analysis and deployment of product requirements based on product-related environmental legislation. The guideline is composed of nine steps, clustered into three groups according to their main objective: (A) identification of environmental product-related legislation; (B) identification of legislative topics to be considered for the deployment of requirements; and (C) creation and validation of product requirements. The product requirements deployed are to be considered during the PDP. The guideline was evaluated in an expert consultation in a large manufacturing company, suggesting that it can be used to support the systematization and deployment of product-related environmental requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Mariana Ferraz & Cláudia Echevenguá Teixeira & Henrique Rozenfeld, 2016. "The Deployment of Product-Related Environmental Legislation into Product Requirements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:4:p:332-:d:67682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/4/332/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/4/332/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gouda, Sirish Kumar & Jonnalagedda, Sreelata & Saranga, Haritha, 2016. "Design for the environment: Impact of regulatory policies on product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 558-570.
    2. Pere Fullana i Palmer & Rita Puig & Alba Bala & Grau Baquero & Jordi Riba & Marco Raugei, 2011. "From Life Cycle Assessment to Life Cycle Management," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(3), pages 458-475, June.
    3. Giulio Mario Cappelletti & Giuseppe Ioppolo & Giuseppe Martino Nicoletti & Carlo Russo, 2014. "Energy Requirement of Extra Virgin Olive Oil Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-9, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shedong Ren & Fangzhi Gui & Yanwei Zhao & Min Zhan & Wanliang Wang & Jianqiang Zhou, 2021. "An Extenics-Based Scheduled Configuration Methodology for Low-Carbon Product Design in Consideration of Contradictory Problem Solving," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-41, May.
    2. Isabel García Gutiérrez & Daniel Elduque & Carmelo Pina & Rafael Tobajas & Carlos Javierre, 2020. "Influence of the Composition on the Environmental Impact of a Casting Magnesium Alloy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Louise Lindkvist Haziri & Erik Sundin & Tomohiko Sakao, 2019. "Feedback from Remanufacturing: Its Unexploited Potential to Improve Future Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Ani Bicaku & Markus Tauber & Jerker Delsing, 2020. "Security standard compliance and continuous verification for Industrial Internet of Things," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(6), pages 15501477209, June.
    5. Stefano Poponi & Andrea Colantoni & Sirio R.S. Cividino & Enrico Maria Mosconi, 2019. "The Stakeholders’ Perspective within the B Corp Certification for a Circular Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Seungyeon Moon & Heesang Lee, 2021. "Shaping a Circular Economy in the Digital TV Industry: Focusing on Ecopreneurship through the Lens of Dynamic Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-41, April.
    7. Vinícius P. Rodrigues & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Jakob W. Andersen & Tim C. McAloone, 2018. "Evaluating the Potential Business Benefits of Ecodesign Implementation: A Logic Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bianca Polenzani & Chiara Riganelli & Andrea Marchini, 2020. "Sustainability Perception of Local Extra Virgin Olive Oil and Consumers’ Attitude: A New Italian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Zhaofu Hong & Hao Wang & Yeming Gong, 2019. "Green product design considering functional-product reference," Post-Print hal-02312293, HAL.
    3. Romain Debref, 2012. "The Paradoxes of Environmental Innovations: The Case of Green Chemistry," Post-Print hal-02047209, HAL.
    4. Wensi Zhang & Jing Xiao & Lingfei Cai, 2020. "Joint Emission Reduction Strategy in Green Supply Chain under Environmental Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    5. Golmohammadi, Amirmohsen & Kraft, Tim & Monemian, Seyedamin, 2024. "Setting the deadline and the penalty policy for a new environmental standard," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 88-101.
    6. Fang, Lei & Zhao, Sai, 2023. "On the green subsidies in a differentiated market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    7. Thornton, PK & Schuetz, T & Förch, W & Cramer, L & Abreu, D & Vermeulen, S & Campbell, BM, 2017. "Responding to global change: A theory of change approach to making agricultural research for development outcome-based," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 145-153.
    8. Juan Zhang & Ziyue Wang & Huiju Zhao, 2020. "The Impact of Consumer Subsidy on Green Technology Innovations for Vehicles and Environmental Impact," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Dong, Jichang & Jing, Yihan & He, Zhou & Dong, Ciwei, 2024. "How to empower commercial satellite supply chain: Insurance, government subsidy or blockchain adoption?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    10. Hafezi, Maryam & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2018. "Green product development and environmental performance: Investigating the role of government regulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 395-410.
    11. Bian, Junsong & Zhao, Xuan, 2020. "Tax or subsidy? An analysis of environmental policies in supply chains with retail competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 901-914.
    12. Sung Hee Lee & Kun Soo Park & Yong Won Seo, 2016. "Multinational Firm’s Production Decisions under Overlapping Free Trade Agreements: Rule of Origin Requirements and Environmental Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Carlo Russo & Giulio Mario Cappelletti & Giuseppe Martino Nicoletti & Alfredo Ernesto Di Noia & George Michalopoulos, 2016. "Comparison of European Olive Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, August.
    14. Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Zangiabadi, Maryam & Hafezi, Maryam, 2023. "How much is enough? Government subsidies in supporting green product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1316-1333.
    15. Cai, Ya-Jun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Feng, Lipan & Li, Yongjian, 2022. "Producer's choice of design-for-environment under environmental taxation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 532-544.
    16. Antonia Tamborrino & Claudio Perone & Filippo Catalano & Giacomo Squeo & Francesco Caponio & Biagio Bianchi, 2019. "Modelling Energy Consumption and Energy-Saving in High-Quality Olive Oil Decanter Centrifuge: Numerical Study and Experimental Validation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Zheng, Xiong & Govindan, Kannan & Deng, Qianzhou & Feng, Lipan, 2019. "Effects of design for the environment on firms’ production and remanufacturing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 217-228.
    18. Qixiang Wang & Xiaobo Wang, 2022. "Does Product Eco-design Promote Remanufacturing: Application of a Stylized Game-theoretic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Martinho, Vítor João Pereira Domingues, 2021. "Direct and indirect energy consumption in farming: Impacts from fertilizer use," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    20. Hong, Zhaofu & Guo, Xiaolong, 2019. "Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 155-166.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:4:p:332-:d:67682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.