IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v6y2014i12p8522-8535d42784.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Influencing Factors on Resettled Farmer’s Satisfaction under the Policy of the Balance between Urban Construction Land Increasing and Rural Construction Land Decreasing: A Case Study of China’s Xinjin County in Chengdu City

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Shui

    (College of Environment and Resources, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jianping Bai

    (Department of Eco-agriculture and Rural Development, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Su Zhang

    (Department of Eco-agriculture and Rural Development, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Yiping Chen

    (College of Environment and Resources, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore what are the influencing factors on resettled farmer’s satisfaction and occupancy under the policy of the balance between urban construction land increasing and rural construction land decreasing in Xinjin County, Chengdu City. Questionnaires, statistical analysis and logistic regressions were employed. The results indicate that the higher educated farmers will be more satisfied with the relocation areas. An increase in the number of public facilities and the associated maintenance costs will decrease the resettled farmer’s satisfaction. Farmers who have moved to new communities are more satisfied with infrastructure, supporting facilities and property management, especially the living environment. The main tasks completed by farmers are the tillage land and to do work for their new community. The positive factors that contribute to the famer’s satisfaction, include land-rights guarantees, compensation for land consolidation, sewage treatment and the living environment. In contrast, public facilities, commercial service networks and resettled area’s maintenance are negative factors for farmer’s satisfaction. Meanwhile, the key factors to promoting harmony between urban and rural construction are to establish relevant laws and regulations, reasonable operation and management mechanisms, farmer-rights protection mechanisms, and to protect famer household income, as well as to improve agricultural production and farmer’s non-agricultural employment opportunity.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Shui & Jianping Bai & Su Zhang & Yiping Chen, 2014. "Analysis of the Influencing Factors on Resettled Farmer’s Satisfaction under the Policy of the Balance between Urban Construction Land Increasing and Rural Construction Land Decreasing: A Case Study o," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:12:p:8522-8535:d:42784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/12/8522/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/12/8522/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuko Arayama & Katsuya Miyoshi, 2004. "Regional Diversity and Sources of Economic Growth in China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(10), pages 1583-1607, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanlong Gu & Yiying Liu & Fengkui Qian & Qiubing Wang & Xiuru Dong, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Affecting Farmer Satisfaction Under the China Link Policy," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    2. Xiaodong Xu & Jingping Liu & Ning Xu & Wei Wang & Hui Yang, 2018. "Quantitative Study on the Evolution Trend and Driving Factors of Typical Rural Spatial Morphology in Southern Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Kexi Xu & Hui Gao & Haijun Bao & Fan Zhou & Jieyu Su, 2021. "Sustainable Transformation of Resettled Communities for Landless Peasants: Generation Logic of Spatial Conflicts," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Shili Guo & Beibei Wang & Kui Zhou & Hui Wang & Qiuping Zeng & Dingde Xu, 2022. "Impact of Fiscal Expenditure on Farmers’ Livelihood Capital in the Ethnic Minority Mountainous Region of Sichuan, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Wei Shui & Yiyi Zhang & Xinggui Wang & Yuanmeng Liu & Qianfeng Wang & Fei Duan & Chaowei Wu & Wanyu Shui, 2022. "Does Tibetan Household Livelihood Capital Enhance Tourism Participation Sustainability? Evidence from China’s Jiaju Tibetan Village," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Liu, Runqiu & Jiang, Jian & Yu, Chao & Rodenbiker, Jesse & Jiang, Yongmu, 2021. "The endowment effect accompanying villagers' withdrawal from rural homesteads: Field evidence from Chengdu, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yingying Zhou & Yaru Xu & Chuanzhe Liu & Zhuoqing Fang & Xinyue Fu & Mingzhao He, 2019. "The Threshold Effect of China’s Financial Development on Green Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Xu Tang & Benjamin C. McLellan & Simon Snowden & Baosheng Zhang & Mikael Höök, 2015. "Dilemmas for China: Energy, Economy and Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Subal C. Kumbhakar, 2017. "Do urbanization and public expenditure affect productivity growth? The case of Chinese Provinces," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 127-156, December.
    4. Tuan, Chyau & Ng, Linda F.Y. & Zhao, Bo, 2009. "China's post-economic reform growth: The role of FDI and productivity progress," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 280-293, May.
    5. Thomas Gries & Margarete Redlin, 2008. "International Integration and Regional Development in China," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2008-66, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Minzhe Du & Bing Wang & Yanrui Wu, 2014. "Sources of China’s Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis Based on the BML Index with Green Growth Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Henderson, Daniel J. & Tochkov, Kiril & Badunenko, Oleg, 2007. "A drive up the capital coast? Contributions to post-reform growth across Chinese provinces," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 569-594, September.
    8. Almas Heshmati & Subal C. Kumbhakar, 2010. "Technical Change and Total Factor Productivity Growth: The Case of Chinese Provinces," TEMEP Discussion Papers 201054, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Feb 2010.
    9. Shiu, Alice & Heshmati, Almas, 2006. "Technical Change and Total Factor Productivity Growth for Chinese Provinces: A Panel Data Analysis," Ratio Working Papers 98, The Ratio Institute.
    10. Flávio Vilela Vieira & Michele Polline Veríssimo, 2005. "Crescimento Econômico De Longo Prazo Na China: Uma Investigação Econométrica," Anais do XXXIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 33rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 067, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    11. Mototsugu Fukushige & Yingxin Shi, 2022. "Quantile regression approach for measuring production inefficiency with empirical application to the primary production sector for the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps in China," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 777-805, June.
    12. Jiancui LIU & Shilin ZHENG, 2018. "The Origins of Productivity Change and Economic Growth in China’s Cities between the Years 2001 and 2014," Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(02), pages 1-27, June.
    13. Du, Qunyang & Li, Zhongyuan & Du, Min & Yang, Tianle, 2024. "Government venture capital and innovation performance in alternative energy production: The moderating role of environmental regulation and capital market activity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    14. Li, Chenhui & Lian, Xubei & Zhang, Zhi, 2018. "Public education expenditure, institution development, and regional innovations: An empirical evidence from China," Economics Discussion Papers 2018-23, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    15. Emanuele Felice & Iacopo Odoardi & Dario D’Ingiullo, 2023. "The Chinese Inland-Coastal Inequality: The Role of Human Capital and the 2007–2008 Crisis Watershed," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 9(2), pages 761-788, July.
    16. Gao, Yuning & Zhang, Meichen & Zheng, Jinghai, 2021. "Accounting and determinants analysis of China's provincial total factor productivity considering carbon emissions," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Chi, Wei & Qian, Xiaoye, 2009. "The role of education in regional innovation activities and economic growth: spatial evidence from China," MPRA Paper 15779, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. CHI, Wei, 2008. "The role of human capital in China's economic development: Review and new evidence," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 421-436, September.
    19. T. Gries & M. Redlin, 2011. "International integration and the determinants of regional development in China," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 149-177, April.
    20. Yuheng Li & Xun Wang & Hans Westlund & Yansui Liu, 2015. "Physical Capital, Human Capital, and Social Capital: The Changing Roles in China's Economic Growth," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 133-149, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:12:p:8522-8535:d:42784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.