IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v4y2012i4p703-720d17297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Densification and Recreational Quality of Public Urban Green Spaces—A Viennese Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Arne Arnberger

    (Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Peter Jordan-Straße 82, Vienna 1190, Austria)

Abstract

Public urban green spaces play an important role in urban sustainability. These places should provide high-quality recreation experiences for the urban residents. However, they are often overused. The Wienerberg area in the south of Vienna, Austria, was transformed from a waste disposal site into a natural recreation area. During the past years, intensive settlement densification processes have taken place, resulting in a doubling of the local population living within a few minutes walking distance. An on-site survey among green space visitors (N = 231) revealed that the majority of them considered the area to be overcrowded on Sundays/holidays and reported a perceived increase in visitor numbers during the past years. Visitors with more past experience, as well as those who have perceived an increase in visitor numbers during recent years, reported higher crowding perceptions. A significant proportion of them try to avoid these crowds, relying on behavioral coping strategies, such as inter-area displacement. While urban regeneration has provided an attractive recreation area, urban densification around the green space appears to have reduced its recreational quality. Monitoring recreation quality indicators, such as crowding perceptions, seems to be useful for sustainable urban green space management and city planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Arne Arnberger, 2012. "Urban Densification and Recreational Quality of Public Urban Green Spaces—A Viennese Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:4:y:2012:i:4:p:703-720:d:17297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/4/703/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/4/703/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cetin, Nuket Ipek & Bourget, Gulhan & Tezer, Azime, 2021. "Travel-cost method for assessing the monetary value of recreational services in the Ömerli Catchment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Angeliki T. Paraskevopoulou & Marina Chletsou & Chrysovalantis Malesios, 2022. "Runners Experience Lower Heart Rate, Increased Speed, and Joy/Calm on Routes with Trees, by the Sea and through Parks: Implications for Climate Change Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Mehdi RAKHSHANDEHROO & Mohd Johari MOHDYUSOF & Osman Mohd TAHIRHOLDER & Mohd Yazid Mohd YUNOS, 2015. "The Socialbenefits Of Urban Open Green Spaces: A Literature Review," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(4), pages 60-71, December.
    4. Liang Wen & Jeffrey Kenworthy & Dora Marinova, 2020. "Higher Density Environments and the Critical Role of City Streets as Public Open Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-34, October.
    5. Poklewski-Koziełł, Damian & Dudzic-Gyurkovich, Karolina & Duarte, Carlos Marmolejo, 2023. "Investigating urban form, and walkability measures in the new developments. The case study of Garnizon in Gdansk," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Miriam Haselbacher & Kanerva Kuokkanen & Emilia Palonen & Ursula Reeger, 2024. "Inclusion and Exclusion in Urban Public Space: Contemporary Challenges in Vienna and Helsinki," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9.
    7. Mahdieh Pazhouhanfar, 2015. "Analysing of Residents’ Understanding about the Inhibiting Factors of Using Urban Parks," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(5), pages 290-297, May.
    8. Peter Barlow & Sean Lyons & Anne Nolan, 2021. "How Perceived Adequacy of Open Public Space Is Related to Objective Green Space and Individuals’ Opinions of Area-Level Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Sofia Nikolaidou & Tanja Klöti & Simone Tappert & Matthias Drilling, 2016. "Urban Gardening and Green Space Governance: Towards New Collaborative Planning Practices," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(1), pages 5-19.
    10. Larondelle, Neele & Lauf, Steffen, 2016. "Balancing demand and supply of multiple urban ecosystem services on different spatial scales," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 18-31.
    11. Karolina Dudzic-Gyurkovich, 2021. "Urban Development and Population Pressure: The Case of Młynówka Królewska Park in Krakow, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Thorsten Schuetze, 2015. "Zero Emission Buildings in Korea—History, Status Quo, and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Tahvonen, Outi & Airaksinen, Miimu, 2018. "Low-density housing in sustainable urban planning – Scaling down to private gardens by using the green infrastructure concept," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 478-485.
    14. Helena Madureira & Ana Monteiro, 2021. "Going Green and Going Dense: A Systematic Review of Compatibilities and Conflicts in Urban Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:4:y:2012:i:4:p:703-720:d:17297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.