IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v2y2009i1p48-72d6655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Agriculture in the United States: A Critical Examination of a Contested Process

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas H. Constance

    (Department of Sociology, Campus Box 2446; Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, 77341-2446, USA)

Abstract

This paper investigates the political economy of the development of sustainable agriculture programs and initiatives in the United States. Sustainable agriculture emerged as part of a growing critique of the negative environmental consequences of unquestioned modern farming methods. The USDA/Sustainable Agriculture Research Education Program created in 1990 and the National Organics Program created in 2002 are the current government-sponsored programs in support of sustainable agriculture. Recently, private approaches to develop a national sustainable agriculture standard for the U.S. have emerged. The events of the cases developed in the paper reveal that because the concept of sustainability is deeply contested, agribusiness is able to exploit the ambiguity surrounding the definition of sustainable and exercise power in attempts to frame sustainable agriculture in their favor. Most recently, this contested process has focused on whether genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) will be included as part of the national sustainable agriculture standard.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas H. Constance, 2009. "Sustainable Agriculture in the United States: A Critical Examination of a Contested Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:2:y:2009:i:1:p:48-72:d:6655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/1/48/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/1/48/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Summer Sullivan, 2023. "Ag-tech, agroecology, and the politics of alternative farming futures: The challenges of bringing together diverse agricultural epistemologies," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 913-928, September.
    2. Qian Forrest Zhang, 2024. "From Sustainable Agriculture to Sustainable Agrifood Systems: A Comparative Review of Alternative Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:2:y:2009:i:1:p:48-72:d:6655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.