IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3040-d1623460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade-Offs and Synergies of Key Biobased Value Chains and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Author

Listed:
  • Víctor Fernández Ocamica

    (Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption CIRCE, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Bárbara Palacino

    (Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption CIRCE, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Carmen Bartolomé

    (Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption CIRCE, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Monique Bernardes Figueirêdo

    (Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption CIRCE, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Cristina Lázaro García

    (Colegio Compañía de María, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

This work identifies relevant sustainability targets from the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for main value chains of biobased products, categorized into four dimensions: environment, circularity, social, and economics. Of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 85 targets were identified as aligning with sustainability criteria for industrial biobased systems. Six sectors with biobased activity were analyzed, chemicals, construction, plastics, textiles, woodworking, and pulp and paper, each represented by 3–5 value chains. These value chains were chosen based on certification availability, production scale in Europe, economic importance, and potential to replace fossil-based products. In total, 25 value chains were assessed qualitatively for their positive, negative, or neutral impact on each selected SDG target, using public data like EU reports, life cycle analyses, and expert insights. The results showed that 43 SDG targets were directly applicable to the value chains, with higher synergies for those using waste as feedstock over primary resources like crops or virgin wood. Overall, advances in technology and holistic approaches are paving the way for biobased solutions to replace resource-intensive, petroleum-derived materials and chemicals. These alternatives offer additional advantages, such as enhanced recyclability, biodegradability, and reduced toxicity, making them promising candidates for sustainable development. This study underscores that technological progress and a comprehensive approach can further advance sustainable biobased solutions in industry and have a relevant positive impact on various SDGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Víctor Fernández Ocamica & Bárbara Palacino & Carmen Bartolomé & Monique Bernardes Figueirêdo & Cristina Lázaro García, 2025. "Trade-Offs and Synergies of Key Biobased Value Chains and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-36, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3040-:d:1623460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3040/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3040/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anguiano-Santos, Carlos & Salazar-Ordóñez, Melania & Tornel-Vázquez, Rossana & Rodríguez-Entrena, Macario, 2024. "Sustainability reporting harmonisation? A utopian endeavour for European agri-food companies," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 354-368.
    2. Heimann, Tobias, 2019. "Bioeconomy and SDGs: Does the Bioeconomy Support the Achievement of the SDGs?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 225998, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Hetemäki, L. & D'Amato, D. & Giurca, A. & Hurmekoski, E., 2024. "Synergies and trade-offs in the European forest bioeconomy research: State of the art and the way forward," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Lourdes Ordoñez Olivo & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Shaping the Knowledge Base of Bioeconomy Sectors Development in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Erika Palmer & Robert Burton & Cecilia Haskins, 2020. "A Systems Engineering Framework for Bioeconomic Transitions in a Sustainable Development Goal Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Marko Lovec & Luka Juvančič, 2021. "The Role of Industrial Revival in Untapping the Bioeconomy’s Potential in Central and Eastern Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Wenche E. Dramstad & Neil Sang & Henrik Forsberg-Mathiesen & Anders Bryn, 2021. "Five Ways of Characterizing Agricultural Land Use Dynamics and Abandonment from Subsidy Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Kostas, Emily T. & Adams, Jessica M.M. & Ruiz, Héctor A. & Durán-Jiménez, Gabriela & Lye, Gary J., 2021. "Macroalgal biorefinery concepts for the circular bioeconomy: A review on biotechnological developments and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Delzeit, Ruth & Heimann, Tobias & Schünemann, Franziska & Söder, Mareike, 2021. "Scenarios for an impact assessment of global bioeconomy strategies: Results from a co-design process," Kiel Working Papers 2188, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    7. Oguntuase Oluwaseun James, 2020. "Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development in Africa – State of Production Determinants and Future Directions," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Rebolledo-Leiva, Ricardo & Moreira, María Teresa & González-García, Sara, 2023. "Progress of social assessment in the framework of bioeconomy under a life cycle perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    9. Idiano D’Adamo & Pasquale Marcello Falcone & Enrica Imbert & Piergiuseppe Morone, 2022. "Exploring regional transitions to the bioeconomy using a socio-economic indicator: the case of Italy," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 39(3), pages 989-1021, October.
    10. Sanz-Hernández, Alexia & Jiménez-Caballero, Paula & Zarauz, Irene, 2022. "Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    11. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Katerina Melfou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2021. "The Knowledge Based Agricultural Bioeconomy: A Bibliometric Network Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Jarosław Brożek & Anna Kożuch & Marek Wieruszewski & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2025. "Verification of the Assumptions of the Polish State Forest Policy in the Context of the New EU Forest Strategy 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Delia-Elena Diaconașu & Ionel Bostan & Cristina Căutișanu & Irina Chiriac, 2022. "Insights into the Sustainable Development of the Bioeconomy at the European Level, in the Context of the Desired Clean Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Andrew M. Neill & Cathal O’Donoghue & Jane C. Stout, 2020. "A Natural Capital Lens for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Determining the Unrealised and Unrecognised Services from Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, September.
    15. Mateus Torres Nazari & Janaína Mazutti & Luana Girardi Basso & Luciane Maria Colla & Luciana Brandli, 2021. "Biofuels and their connections with the sustainable development goals: a bibliometric and systematic review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 11139-11156, August.
    16. Jakob Hildebrandt & Alberto Bezama & Daniela Thrän, 2020. "Insights from the Sustainability Monitoring Tool SUMINISTRO Applied to a Case Study System of Prospective Wood-Based Industry Networks in Central Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-30, May.
    17. Lisa Biber‐Freudenberger & Candan Ergeneman & Jan Janosch Förster & Thomas Dietz & Jan Börner, 2020. "Bioeconomy futures: Expectation patterns of scientists and practitioners on the sustainability of bio‐based transformation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1220-1235, September.
    18. Palátová, P. & Rinn, R. & Machoň, M. & Paluš, H. & Purwestri, R.C. & Jarský, V., 2023. "Sharing economy in the forestry sector: Opportunities and barriers," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. Lea F. Stöber & Marius Boesino & Andreas Pyka & Franziska Schuenemann, 2023. "Bioeconomy Innovation Networks in Urban Regions: The Case of Stuttgart," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Nilay Kumar Sarker & Prasad Kaparaju, 2024. "Microalgal Bioeconomy: A Green Economy Approach Towards Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-45, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3040-:d:1623460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.