IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2786-d1617004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employing Binary Logistic Regression in Modeling the Effectiveness of Agricultural Extension in Clove Farming: Facts and Findings from Sidrap Regency, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Hasim Hasim

    (Agribusiness Study Program, Graduate School of Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Muslim Salam

    (Laboratory of Agricultural Development, Department of Socio-Economics of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Andi Amran Sulaiman

    (Laboratory of Agricultural Development, Department of Socio-Economics of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Muhammad Hatta Jamil

    (Laboratory of Agricultural Development, Department of Socio-Economics of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Hari Iswoyo

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Hasanuddin University, JL. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Pipi Diansari

    (Department of Socio-Economics of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Ariady Arsal

    (Agribusiness Study Program, Graduate School of Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Andi Nixia Tenriawaru

    (Department of Socio-Economics of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Akhsan Akhsan

    (Laboratory of Agricultural Development, Department of Socio-Economics of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Ahmad Imam Muslim

    (The United Graduate School of Agriculture Sciences, Kagoshima University, Korimoto-ichi-chome 21-ban 24-go, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan)

Abstract

The research objective was to examine the factors influencing the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming in Sidrap Regency. Primary data were collected using structured interviews with 140 selected clove farmers to achieve this objective. The binary logistic regression model was employed to test the influence of fourteen independent variables on the dependent variable. The research results indicated that the variables of family size, mass communication approach, electronic media, and clove cultivation material significantly and positively impacted the effectiveness of agricultural extension in clove farming. Meanwhile, the variables of educational attainment, farming experiences, farmers’ cosmopolitanism, print media, and land area had a negative significant effect, and the other variables had no significant effect. These findings are important indicators and valuable insights in promoting and encouraging the effectiveness of extension in clove farming. The findings emphasize the significant role of family characteristics, agricultural extension approaches, and communication delivery methods in the diffusion of agricultural technology and enhancing the effectiveness of agricultural extension. Based on the research results, policy recommendations are proposed to enhance extension effectiveness in clove farming, specifically, augmented farmer education on clove cultivation and the intensification and extensification of mass extension methods, as well as using electronic media in extension activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasim Hasim & Muslim Salam & Andi Amran Sulaiman & Muhammad Hatta Jamil & Hari Iswoyo & Pipi Diansari & Ariady Arsal & Andi Nixia Tenriawaru & Akhsan Akhsan & Ahmad Imam Muslim, 2025. "Employing Binary Logistic Regression in Modeling the Effectiveness of Agricultural Extension in Clove Farming: Facts and Findings from Sidrap Regency, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2786-:d:1617004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2786/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2786/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kassem, Hazem S. & Alotaibi, Bader Alhafi & Muddassir, Muhammad & Herab, Ahmed, 2021. "Factors influencing farmers’ satisfaction with the quality of agricultural extension services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Muhammad Hatta Jamil & Nadine Tika & Letty Fudjaja & A. Nixia Tenriawaru & Muslim Salam & Muhammad Ridwan & Ahmad Imam Muslim & Nividita Varun Chand, 2023. "Effectiveness of Agricultural Extension on Paddy Rice Farmer’s Baubau City, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Khodran Alzahrani & Mubashar Ali & Muhammad Imran Azeem & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi, 2023. "Efficacy of Public Extension and Advisory Services for Sustainable Rice Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Harper, Alison & Mustafee, Navonil & Yearworth, Mike, 2021. "Facets of trust in simulation studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 197-213.
    5. Hunt, Warren & Birch, Colin & Vanclay, Frank & Coutts, Jeff, 2014. "Recommendations arising from an analysis of changes to the Australian agricultural research, development and extension system," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 129-141.
    6. Mariel, Juliette & Sanchez, Isabelle & Verzelen, Nicolas & Massol, François & Carrière, Stéphanie M. & Labeyrie, Vanesse, 2024. "The role of farmers' networks in sourcing planting material and information in a context of agroforestry transition in Madagascar," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    7. Cook, Brian R. & Satizábal, Paula & Curnow, Jayne, 2021. "Humanising agricultural extension: A review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    8. Yemane Asmelash Gebremariam & Joost Dessein & Beneberu Assefa Wondimagegnhu & Mark Breusers & Lutgart Lenaerts & Enyew Adgo & Zemen Ayalew & Amare Sewenet Minale & Jan Nyssen, 2021. "Determinants of Farmers’ Level of Interaction with Agricultural Extension Agencies in Northwest Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chengdong Liao & Helen Ross & Natalie Jones & Gomathy Palaniappan, 2024. "System lacks systems thinking: Top‐down organization and actor agency in China's agricultural extension system," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 82-99, January.
    2. G. Yoganandan & Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman & M. Vasan & Abdelrhman Meero, 2022. "Evaluating agripreneurs’ satisfaction: exploring the effect of demographics and emporographics," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Läpple, Doris & Renwick, Alan & Thorne, Fiona, 2015. "Measuring and understanding the drivers of agricultural innovation: Evidence from Ireland," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-8.
    4. Katarzyna Zawalińska & Alexandra Smyrniotopoulou & Katalin Balazs & Michael Böhm & Mihai Chitea & Violeta Florian & Mihaela Fratila & Piotr Gradziuk & Stuart Henderson & Katherine Irvine & Vasilia Kon, 2022. "Advancing the Contributions of European Stakeholders in Farming Systems to Transitions to Agroecology," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 50-63, December.
    5. Luciano Barcellos-Paula & Iván De la Vega & Anna María Gil-Lafuente, 2021. "The Quintuple Helix of Innovation Model and the SDGs: Latin-American Countries’ Case and Its Forgotten Effects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Jenel Ituriaga & Klint Allen Mariñas & Charmine Sheena Saflor, 2024. "Enhancing Government Services to Rice Farmers in the Philippines: A Service Quality–Sustainability-Focused Approach for Long-Term Agricultural Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Nguyen, Le Khanh Ngan & Howick, Susan & Megiddo, Itamar, 2024. "A framework for conceptualising hybrid system dynamics and agent-based simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1153-1166.
    8. Khuc, Van Quy, 2022. "Mindspongeconomics," OSF Preprints hnucr_v1, Center for Open Science.
    9. Md. Ashraful Islam & Md. Aminul Islam & Farid Ahammad Sobhani & Pradip Royhan & Md. Kausar Alam & Md. Sharif Hassan, 2023. "The Paddy Procurement System for Sustainability: Evidence from Bangladesh Agriculture Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.
    10. Margherita Masi & Marcello Rosa & Yari Vecchio & Luca Bartoli & Felice Adinolfi, 2022. "The long way to innovation adoption: insights from precision agriculture," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Luciano Barcellos-Paula & Anna María Gil-Lafuente & Aline Castro-Rezende, 2023. "Algorithm Applied to SDG13: A Case Study of Ibero-American Countries," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Petheram, C. & McKellar, L. & Holz, L. & Poulton, P. & Podger, S. & Yeates, S., 2016. "Evaluation of the economic feasibility of water harvesting for irrigation in a large semi-arid tropical catchment in northern Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 84-98.
    13. Deane, Felicity & Wilson, Clevo & Rowlings, David & Webb, Jeremy & Mitchell, Elaine & Hamman, Evan & Sheppard, Eva & Grace, Peter, 2018. "Sugarcane farming and the Great Barrier Reef: the role of a principled approach to change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 691-698.
    14. McGill, David, 2022. "Innovations for extension: a case study from Pakistan," 2022: Celebrating Agriculture for Development - Outcomes, impacts and the way ahead, 15-16 August 2022 333330, Crawford Fund.
    15. Yao Dinard Kouadio & Amètépé Nathanaël Beauclair Anani & Bonoua Faye & Yadong Fan, 2023. "Determinants Influencing Cocoa Farmers’ Satisfaction with Input Credit in the Nawa Region of Côte d’Ivoire," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Ollerenshaw, Alison & Murphy, Angela & Walters, Judi & Robinson, Nathan & Thompson, Helen, 2023. "Use of digital technology for research data and information transfer within the Australian grains sector: A case study using Online Farm Trials," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    17. Cawley, A.P & Heanue, K. & O’Donoghue, C. & Sheehan, M., 2015. "The Impact of Extension Services on Farm Level Outcomes: An Instrumental Variable Approach," 150th Seminar, October 22-23, 2015, Edinburgh, Scotland 212664, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Djuraeva, Mukhayyo & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Kuhn, Lena & Glauben, Thomas, 2023. "The impact of agricultural extension type and form on technical efficiency under transition: An empirical assessment of wheat production in Uzbekistan," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 203-221.
    19. Nathan Einbinder & Helda Morales & Mateo Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho & Bruce G. Ferguson & Miriam Aldasoro & Ronald Nigh, 2022. "Agroecology from the ground up: a critical analysis of sustainable soil management in the highlands of Guatemala," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 979-996, September.
    20. Lisa Lobry de Bruyn & Susan Andrews, 2016. "Are Australian and United States Farmers Using Soil Information for Soil Health Management?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-33, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2786-:d:1617004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.