IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2581-d1612711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Cosmetics—The Effects of Package Design on Consumers’ Willingness-to-Pay and Sustainability Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Jens K. Perret

    (International School of Management, Im MediaPark 5c, 50667 Cologne, Germany)

  • Alicia Gómez Velázquez

    (International School of Management, Im MediaPark 5c, 50667 Cologne, Germany)

  • Audrey Mehn

    (International School of Management, Otto-Hahn-Str. 19, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

Abstract

The cosmetics industry requires a long-term, sustainable vision to reduce its impact on the environment. Within this process, packaging is of critical relevance, as it impacts the ecological footprint of products and determines consumers’ perception of the product as sustainable and green while shaping their willingness to purchase the product. This article implements a mixed-methods design to combine theoretical insights with the opinions of experts and the perceptions of consumers. It elicits which packaging elements are the most important in determining consumers’ willingness to pay for green cosmetics and which are the most important regarding their perception of the product being sustainable and green. The results of the conjoint analysis-based study conducted in Germany indicate the predominance of the used materials for packaging over other characteristics (glass +EUR 1, bio-based materials +EUR 0.92, recycled plastic +EUR 0.75 vs. wood as base category). Labels (Veganblume +EUR 0.68, Cruelty-Free +EUR 0.11) and the availability of refill options (+EUR 0.61) score in second place, while coloring (black −EUR 0.2, green −EUR 0.11, brown −EUR 0.13 vs. white as the base category) and QR codes (+EUR 0.13) score last regarding participants’ willingness to purchase the product. The results also reveal a distinct difference between the order of attributes driving the willingness to pay and those driving the perception of the sustainability of a product. Regarding sustainability perception, the relevance of labels and color increases distinctly, while package material remains the dominant attribute.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens K. Perret & Alicia Gómez Velázquez & Audrey Mehn, 2025. "Green Cosmetics—The Effects of Package Design on Consumers’ Willingness-to-Pay and Sustainability Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2581-:d:1612711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2581/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2581/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pragya Srivastava & Dakuri Ramakanth & Konala Akhila & Kirtiraj K. Gaikwad, 2022. "Package design as a branding tool in the cosmetic industry: consumers’ perception vs. reality," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(6), pages 1-38, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan Sun & Rachel Wang & Huifeng Bai & Georgina Whyatt & Tesalia Tamara Ohandi, 2024. "Perceived values of luxury fashion brands—evidence from Indonesian Millennials," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(12), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Maysam Shafiee Roodposhti & Hamideh Mojtahed Soleimani & Mohammad Zand & Mohammadali Sharafian, 2025. "Designing brand performance evaluation model in an online business," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-37, January.
    3. Adrianna Mateja & Patryk Wlekly, 2024. "Determinants of Choosing an Online Cosmetics Store: An Eye-Tracking Study on the Impact of Website Aesthetics on Purchase Decisions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special B), pages 826-847.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2581-:d:1612711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.