IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2275-d1606115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooling Efficiency of Urban Green Spaces Across Functional Zones: Mitigating Heat Island Effects Through Spatial Configuration

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Wang

    (State Key Laboratory for Ecological Security of Regions and Cities, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yin Ren

    (State Key Laboratory for Ecological Security of Regions and Cities, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China)

Abstract

With the acceleration of urbanization, the urban heat island effect has garnered increasing attention. However, few studies have explored the differential impacts of urban green spaces on the UHI across various urban functional zones (UFZs). This study takes Xiamen Island as the research object and selects nine representative landscape pattern indices to characterize the spatial patterns of UGS in each urban functional zone. Through Pearson correlation analysis, four landscape indices—largest patch index (LPI), mean patch area (AREA_MN), area-weighted average shape index (SHAPE_AM), and aggregation index (AI)—were chosen to reveal the varying influences of UGS spatial patterns on the UHI in different urban functional zones. These four landscape indices reflect aspects such as area, shape complexity, density size, and variation, as well as the aggregation of UGS. To address the spatial autocorrelation of variables, a spatial regression model was established. Given that the parameters of the spatial lag model outperformed those of the spatial error model, the spatial lag model was selected. Key findings reveal that the cooling efficiency of UGS varies across UFZs. In urban residential zones (URZs), UGS with complex shapes significantly enhances cooling, as indicated by a negative correlation between SHAPE_AM and LST (β = −0.446, p < 0.05). In urban village zones (UVZs), larger green patches have a stronger cooling effect, with AREA_MN showing a significant negative correlation with LST (β = −1.772, p < 0.05). The results indicate that UGS in different urban functional zones plays distinct roles in mitigating the UHI, with its cooling effects being associated with the spatial patterns of UGS. Therefore, it is recommended to adopt differentiated planning strategies for UGS in various urban functional zones to contribute to a more sustainable and thermally comfortable urban environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Wang & Yin Ren, 2025. "Cooling Efficiency of Urban Green Spaces Across Functional Zones: Mitigating Heat Island Effects Through Spatial Configuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2275-:d:1606115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luc Anselin, 1998. "GIS Research Infrastructure for Spatial Analysis of Real Estate Markets," Journal of Housing Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 113-133, January.
    2. Luc Anselin & Raymond J. G. M. Florax, 1995. "New Directions in Spatial Econometrics: Introduction," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Luc Anselin & Raymond J. G. M. Florax (ed.), New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, chapter 1, pages 3-18, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chocholatá Michaela & Furková Andrea, 2017. "Regional Disparities in Education Attainment Level in the European Union: A Spatial Approach," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 107-131, October.
    2. Eveline Van Leeuwen & Sandy Dall'erba, 2000. "Does Agricultural Employment Benefit From EU Support?," Regional and Urban Modeling 283600099, EcoMod.
    3. Rui Baptista & Vítor Escária & Paulo Madruga, 2008. "Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: the case of Portugal," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 49-58, January.
    4. Bonev, Petyo & Glachant, Matthieu & Söderberg, Magnus, 2022. "Implicit yardstick competition between heating monopolies in urban areas: Theory and evidence from Sweden," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Shang, Hua & Jiang, Li & Pan, Xianyou & Pan, Xiongfeng, 2022. "Green technology innovation spillover effect and urban eco-efficiency convergence: Evidence from Chinese cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    6. Giuseppe Arbia & Jean H. P. Paelinck, 2003. "Spatial Econometric Modeling of Regional Convergence in Continuous Time," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 342-362, July.
    7. Harald Badinger & Thomas Url, 2002. "Determinants of regional unemployment: some evidence from Austria," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(9), pages 977-988.
    8. Ye, Jiangfeng & Wan, Qunchao & Li, Ruida & Yao, Zhu & Huang, Dujuan, 2022. "How do R&D agglomeration and economic policy uncertainty affect the innovative performance of Chinese high-tech industry?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Patuelli, Roberto & Reggiani, Aura & Nijkamp, Peter & Bade, Franz-Josef, 2010. "The evolution of the commuting network in Germany: Spatial and connectivity patterns," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 2(3), pages 5-37.
    10. Ghazala Aziz & Zouheir Mighri, 2022. "Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Forestry in China: A Spatial Panel Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-40, October.
    11. Bettina H. Aten, 1997. "Does Space Matter? International Comparisons of the Prices of Tradables and Nontradables," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 20(1-2), pages 35-52, April.
    12. Islas-Aguirre, Juan Francisco & Venegas-Martínez, Francisco, 2024. "Interacción entre apoyos monetarios agrícolas y pobreza en los estados de mayor producción agrícola en México (2020), un enfoque de econometría espacial," Panorama Económico, Escuela Superior de Economía, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, vol. 19(40), pages 203-231, Primer se.
    13. Marvin A. Titus & Adriana Vamosiu & Shannon Hayes Buenaflor & Casey Maliszewski Lukszo, 2021. "Persistent Cost Efficiency at Public Community Colleges in the US: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 62(8), pages 1168-1197, December.
    14. Tiiu Paas & Friso Schittle & Andres Kuusk, 2000. "Modelling Regional Income Convergence in EU-25," Regional and Urban Modeling 283600067, EcoMod.
    15. Harald Badinger & Werner Muller & Gabriele Tondl, 2004. "Regional Convergence in the European Union, 1985- 1999: A Spatial Dynamic Panel Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 241-253.
    16. Michael Fritsch & Pamela Mueller, 2004. "Effects of New Business Formation on Regional Development over Time," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 961-975.
    17. Lovell, Sabrina J. & Lynch, Lori, 2002. "Hedonic Price Analysis Of Easement Payments In Agricultural Land Preservation Programs," Working Papers 28564, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    18. Elżbieta Antczak & Katarzyna M. Miszczyńska, 2021. "Causes of Sickness Absenteeism in Europe—Analysis from an Intercountry and Gender Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Yu, Binbin & Zhou, Xinru, 2023. "Urban administrative hierarchy and urban land use efficiency: Evidence from Chinese cities," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 178-195.
    20. Niebuhr, Annekatrin, 2000. "Raumliche Wachstumszusammenhange - Empirische Befunde Fur Deutschland," Discussion Paper Series 26191, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2275-:d:1606115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.