IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2252-d1605791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Geochemical Characteristics of Composite Geothermal Reservoirs for Sustainable Utilization: A Case Study of the Northwestern Shandong Geothermal Area in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Qiao

    (China Renewable Energy Engineering Institute, Beijing 100120, China)

  • Man Li

    (Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
    Technical Innovation Center for Geothermal and HDR Exploration and Development, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shijiazhuang 050800, China)

  • Long Chen

    (Guiyang Engineering Corporation Limited, Guiyang 553304, China)

  • Hanxiong Zhang

    (Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
    Technical Innovation Center for Geothermal and HDR Exploration and Development, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shijiazhuang 050800, China)

  • Wei Zhang

    (Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
    Technical Innovation Center for Geothermal and HDR Exploration and Development, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shijiazhuang 050800, China)

Abstract

Presently, geothermal resources have been globally recognized as an indispensable component of the energy system due to their sustainability. However, previous studies on geothermal reservoirs focus primarily on single reservoirs, lacking a systematic investigation of composite geothermal reservoirs. The geothermal reservoirs in the northwestern Shandong geothermal area in China are primarily of sandstone and karst types, characterized by extensive distributions, shallow burial depths, high water temperatures, and high water abundance, holding considerable potential for exploitation. This study explored the hydrochemical, isotopic, and circulation characteristics of geothermal fluids in the composite geothermal reservoirs in the study area using methods like hydrogeochemistry and geothermal geology. The purpose is to determine the geochemical differences in geothermal fluids across the composite geothermal reservoirs and provide scientific support for subsequently efficient and sustainable exploitation and utilization of geothermal resources in the study area. The composite geothermal reservoirs in the study area are composed of porous sandstone geothermal reservoirs (also referred to as sandstone reservoirs) in the upper part and karst-fissured geothermal reservoirs (also referred to as karst reservoirs) in the lower part. The results show that the geothermal fluids in the sandstone and karst reservoirs are primarily of Na-Cl-SO 4 and Na-Ca-Cl-SO 4 types, respectively. The hydrochemical composition of geothermal fluids in the karst reservoirs is principally influenced by the precipitation–dissolution equilibrium of carbonate and sulfate minerals, while that in the sandstone reservoirs is predominantly influenced by the precipitation–dissolution equilibrium of carbonate and silicate minerals, as well as cation exchange reactions. The temperatures of the karst reservoirs were calculated at 52.9–82.09 °C using geothermometers. Given the cold-water mixing ratios range from 89% to 96%, the corrected reservoir temperatures vary from 200 to 225 °C. In contrast, the temperatures of the sandstone reservoirs were calculated at 60.54–85.88 °C using geothermometers. These reservoirs exhibit cold water mixing ratios ranging from 85% to 90%, and their corrected reservoir temperatures vary from 150 to 200 °C accordingly. The circulation depths of geothermal fluids in the karst and sandstone reservoirs range from 1107.28 to 1836.69 m and from 1366.60 to 2102.29 m, respectively. The study area is primarily recharged by meteoric water from Mount Tai and the Lushan and Yishan mountains (collectively referred to as the Tai-Lu-Yi mountains) to the southeast of the study area. Investigating the differences in geochemical characteristics of geothermal fluids in composite geothermal reservoirs in the study area is significant for balancing the exploitation and supply of geothermal resources, optimizing the exploitation and utilization modes, and promoting the efficient and sustainable exploitation and utilization of geothermal resources in the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Qiao & Man Li & Long Chen & Hanxiong Zhang & Wei Zhang, 2025. "Exploring Geochemical Characteristics of Composite Geothermal Reservoirs for Sustainable Utilization: A Case Study of the Northwestern Shandong Geothermal Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2252-:d:1605791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2252/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2252/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spittler, Nathalie & Shafiei, Ehsan & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur & Juliusson, Egill, 2020. "Modelling geothermal resource utilization by incorporating resource dynamics, capacity expansion, and development costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spittler, Nathalie & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur & Shafiei, Ehsan & Diemer, Arnaud, 2021. "Implications of renewable resource dynamics for energy system planning: The case of geothermal and hydropower in Kenya," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Chen, Hongfei & Liu, Hongtao & Yang, Fuxin & Tan, Houzhang & Wang, Bangju, 2023. "Field measurements and numerical investigation on heat transfer characteristics and long-term performance of deep borehole heat exchangers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1125-1136.
    3. Marcy, Cara & Goforth, Teagan & Nock, Destenie & Brown, Maxwell, 2022. "Comparison of temporal resolution selection approaches in energy systems models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    4. Li, Shuang & Wang, Gaosheng & Zhou, Mengmeng & Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Yi, Junlin & Zhao, Jialin & Zhou, Yifan, 2024. "Thermal performance of an aquifer thermal energy storage system: Insights from novel multilateral wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    5. Hui Zou & Xiaohua Ma, 2021. "Identifying resource and environmental carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: the perspectives of spatial differences and sustainable development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14775-14798, October.
    6. Li, Chao & Jiang, Chao & Guan, Yanling & Tan, Zijing & Zhao, Zhiqiang & Zhou, Yang, 2022. "Development and applicability of heat transfer analytical model for coaxial-type deep-buried pipes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Li, Ji & Xu, Wei & Li, Jianfeng & Huang, Shuai & Li, Zhao & Qiao, Biao & Yang, Chun & Sun, Deyu & Zhang, Guangqiu, 2021. "Heat extraction model and characteristics of coaxial deep borehole heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 738-751.
    8. Satya Widya Yudha & Benny Tjahjono & Philip Longhurst, 2022. "Unearthing the Dynamics of Indonesia’s Geothermal Energy Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Esra Ilbahar & Cengiz Kahraman & Selcuk Cebi, 2023. "Evaluation of sustainable energy planning scenarios with a new approach based on FCM, WASPAS and impact effort matrix," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11931-11955, October.
    10. Spittler, Nathalie & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur & Shafiei, Ehsan & Leaver, Jonathan & Asgeirsson, Eyjolfur Ingi & Stefansson, Hlynur, 2020. "The role of geothermal resources in sustainable power system planning in Iceland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1081-1090.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2252-:d:1605791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.