IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2129-d1603247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Capacity of Outdoor Earthquake Evacuation Sites in Daegu, South Korea: Assessing De Facto Population Dynamics and Accessibility Through the Geographic Information System (GIS)

Author

Listed:
  • Jin-Wook Park

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Keimyung University, 1095 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study evaluates urban resilience to earthquakes in Daegu Metropolitan City, South Korea, by analyzing outdoor evacuation sites through a dual-axis matrix framework to provide feasible solutions for enhancing urban resilience. Evacuation capacity was assessed by use of resident and de facto population data, while Geographic Information System (GIS) network analysis identified evacuation-feasible and evacuation-infeasible areas. The matrix categorizes areas along two axes: capacity ( x -axis) and evacuation-infeasible areas ( y -axis), facilitating targeted improvement strategies. Findings reveal that only 54 of 139 census blocks possess sufficient capacity and no evacuation-infeasible areas. For areas with adequate capacity but extensive infeasible areas, redistributing evacuation sites is recommended to improve accessibility. Areas with limited capacity but no infeasible areas require additional outdoor evacuation sites to accommodate the population. In regions constrained by both capacity and accessibility, establishing new evacuation sites within infeasible areas is essential. For critically low-capacity areas without infeasible areas, multi-use spaces, such as disaster prevention parks, are desirable to address evacuation needs. Lastly, areas lacking both capacity and accessibility urgently require new evacuation sites concentrated in infeasible areas. By simplifying complex variables into a capacity–accessibility matrix, this study integrates population dynamics, spatial accessibility, and site capacity, offering implementable solutions for earthquake preparedness in densely populated urban settings. Additionally, this approach supports urban planning efforts to mitigate seismic damage and enhance urban sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin-Wook Park, 2025. "An Analysis of the Capacity of Outdoor Earthquake Evacuation Sites in Daegu, South Korea: Assessing De Facto Population Dynamics and Accessibility Through the Geographic Information System (GIS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2129-:d:1603247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hao Wu & Lingbo Liu & Yang Yu & Zhenghong Peng, 2018. "Evaluation and Planning of Urban Green Space Distribution Based on Mobile Phone Data and Two-Step Floating Catchment Area Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aurélie Mercier & Stéphanie Souche‐Le Corvec & Nicolas Ovtracht, 2021. "Measure of accessibility to postal services in France: A potential spatial accessibility approach applied in an urban region," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(1), pages 227-249, February.
    2. Ivanize Silva & Rafael Santos & António Lopes & Virgínia Araújo, 2018. "Morphological Indices as Urban Planning Tools in Northeastern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Meihan Jin & Lu Liu & De Tong & Yongxi Gong & Yu Liu, 2019. "Evaluating the Spatial Accessibility and Distribution Balance of Multi-Level Medical Service Facilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Miloslava Plachkinova & Au Vo & Brian Hilton & Rahul Bhaskar, 2018. "Response to Delamater’s Comment on “A Conceptual Framework for Quality Healthcare Accessibility: A Scalable Approach for Big Data Technologies”," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 311-314, April.
    5. Min Liu & Xiaoma Li & Ding Song & Hui Zhai, 2021. "Evaluation and Monitoring of Urban Public Greenspace Planning Using Landscape Metrics in Kunming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Hongzan Jiao & Chengcong Li & Yang Yu & Zhenghong Peng, 2020. "Urban Public Green Space Equity against the Context of High-Speed Urbanization in Wuhan, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Toone, Trevyn A., 2024. "Animal-named businesses are low-cost, accessible indicators of wildlife socio-cultural value," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Zhengna Song & Tinggan Yan & Yunjian Ge, 2018. "Spatial Equilibrium Allocation of Urban Large Public General Hospitals Based on the Welfare Maximization Principle: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Jing Wu & Jingwen Li & Yue Ma, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Potential and Actual of Urban Waterfront Spaces in Wuhan Based on Social Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Lingbo Liu & Zhenghong Peng & Hao Wu & Hongzan Jiao & Yang Yu & Jie Zhao, 2018. "Fast Identification of Urban Sprawl Based on K-Means Clustering with Population Density and Local Spatial Entropy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Yoon Ha Lee & Ji Soo Lee & Seung Chan Baek & Won Hwa Hong, 2020. "Spatial Equity with Census Population Data vs. Floating Population Data: The Distribution of Earthquake Evacuation Shelters in Daegu, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Havinga, Ilan & Bogaart, Patrick W. & Hein, Lars & Tuia, Devis, 2020. "Defining and spatially modelling cultural ecosystem services using crowdsourced data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    13. Areum Jo & Sang-Kyeong Lee & Jaecheol Kim, 2020. "Gender Gaps in the Use of Urban Space in Seoul: Analyzing Spatial Patterns of Temporary Populations Using Mobile Phone Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Kunyuan Wanghe & Xinle Guo & Xiaofeng Luan & Kai Li, 2019. "Assessment of Urban Green Space Based on Bio-Energy Landscape Connectivity: A Case Study on Tongzhou District in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Yu Zheng & Shan Wang & Jinli Zhu & Shuo Huang & Linli Cheng & Jianwen Dong & Yuxiang Sun, 2023. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of Supply and Demand in Urban Parks along “Luck Greenway” in Fuzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Lingbo Liu & Zhenghong Peng & Hao Wu & Hongzan Jiao & Yang Yu, 2018. "Exploring Urban Spatial Feature with Dasymetric Mapping Based on Mobile Phone Data and LUR-2SFCAe Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    17. Jui-Hung Kao & Wei-Chen Wu & Cheng-Hu Chow & Horng-Twu Liaw, 2021. "The Discussion of Potential Care Needs for Physically and Mentally Disabled Citizens in Taipei City by Using Spatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, March.
    18. Li, Xianghua & Deng, Yue & Yuan, Xuesong & Wang, Zhen & Gao, Chao, 2022. "Data-driven behavioral analysis and applications: A case study in Changchun, China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 596(C).
    19. Lige Xu & Kailun Fang & Yu Huang & Shuangyu Xu, 2023. "Demand Priority of Green Space from the Perspective of Carbon Emissions and Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Xiaomeng Zhu & Zhijun Tong & Xingpeng Liu & Xiangqian Li & Pengda Lin & Tong Wang, 2018. "An Improved Two-Step Floating Catchment Area Method for Evaluating Spatial Accessibility to Urban Emergency Shelters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2129-:d:1603247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.