IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2096-d1602231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Support for Infrastructure Management of Public Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Nikša Jajac

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geodesy, University of Split, Matice hrvatske 15, 21000 Split, Croatia)

Abstract

The management of public institutions is focused not only on providing and improving public services but also on managing the physical infrastructure that these institutions use—buildings for provision of such services. The focus of this paper is on decision support to the management of individual buildings and the set of such buildings (portfolio) during the planning phase. More precisely, it is directed towards support towards both the decision-maker (DM) and decision-making process (DMP) when planning construction activities/projects such as maintenance, renovation, reconstruction, extension, construction, design/preparation of project-technical documentation, etc. The aforementioned DMP includes the processing of a large amount of diverse data (technical, economic, social, etc.) expressed differently—numerically or descriptively, as well as in different units of measurement, simultaneously taking into account the different wishes and attitudes of stakeholders (consequently meeting their often conflicting goals and criteria). The above indicates that it is a complex and ill-defined multi-criteria problem faced by the DM/planner. On top of that, and knowing that the DM usually does not have all the necessary knowledge and skills, this paper proposes how to overcome these issues by supporting the DM within the DMP during such a planning process. The proposed concept promotes an integral (considering relevant aspects of this management problem) and inclusive (taking into account the views of relevant stakeholders) approach to managing complex construction projects and their portfolios. It is methodologically based on the logic of decision support systems and multi-criteria analysis. The multi-criteria methods used include the Preference Ranking Organization METhod for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) for the evaluation and comparison of alternatives in an integral manner, as well as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for determining the weights of criteria and achieving an inclusive and consistent approach to relevant stakeholders (based on the goal tree approach). The concept was tested on the planning of infrastructure management at a university in the Republic of Croatia, and it was proven to be useful because it provided the DM with a basis for decision making. The usefulness of the concept was confirmed by the concordance of the plan obtained using the concept and the activities/projects actually realized.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikša Jajac, 2025. "Decision Support for Infrastructure Management of Public Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-29, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2096-:d:1602231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2096/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2096/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2096-:d:1602231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.