IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1991-d1599926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Analysis and Benefit Evaluation of Ridesharing Behavior in Bus Lanes Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Yunqiang Xue

    (School of Transportation Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China
    Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Boru Zhang

    (School of Transportation Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Caifeng Tan

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Nanchang Jiaotong Institute, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Haibo Chen

    (Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Guangfa Bao

    (School of Transportation Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Jiayu Liu

    (School of Transportation Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Yuhan Bi

    (School of Transportation Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Junying Li

    (School of Transportation Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Hongzhi Guan

    (College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Green Construction and Smart Traffic Control of Transportation Infrastructure, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

Abstract

Sharing dedicated bus lanes with ridesharing private vehicles plays a positive role in improving road traffic efficiency and alleviating traffic congestion. This study investigates the willingness to adopt ridesharing and analyzes the factors influencing ridesharing decisions. Under the scenario of opening dedicated bus lanes to private ridesharing vehicles, a ridesharing decision-making model for dedicated bus lanes is established based on cumulative prospect theory. We analyze the impact of the bus-lane-sharing strategy on travelers’ ridesharing decisions and traffic flow structure. In addition, a bus lane operational efficiency evaluation model based on the combined weighting–TOPSIS method is constructed. Using the principle of maximum closeness, the operational efficiency of bus lanes is evaluated through a case study in a specific area of Nanchang City. The research results indicate that the closeness degree is 0.3720 without the bus-lane-sharing strategy, while the minimum closeness degree is 0.3744 and the maximum closeness degree is 0.3749 when the bus-lane-sharing policy is implemented. Therefore, the implementation of the bus-lane-sharing strategy demonstrates better operational efficiency compared to scenarios without sharing strategies. Additionally, when the number of ridesharing vehicles is relatively small and their capacity is large, travel costs are significantly reduced, and the overall road operational efficiency is improved. This study provides important reference values and practical significance for alleviating traffic congestion, improving the utilization efficiency of road resources, and formulating bus-lane-sharing policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunqiang Xue & Boru Zhang & Caifeng Tan & Haibo Chen & Guangfa Bao & Jiayu Liu & Yuhan Bi & Junying Li & Hongzhi Guan, 2025. "Decision Analysis and Benefit Evaluation of Ridesharing Behavior in Bus Lanes Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-28, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1991-:d:1599926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1991/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1991/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    2. Zhu, H.B., 2010. "Numerical study of urban traffic flow with dedicated bus lane and intermittent bus lane," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(16), pages 3134-3139.
    3. Wufeng Qiao & Zepeng Yang & Bo Peng & Xiaoyu Cai & Yuanyuan Zhang, 2024. "Integrated Evaluation Method of Bus Lane Traffic Benefit Based on Multi-Source Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Guorong Zheng & Mingyan Zhang & Lei Liu, 2022. "Research on the Cooperative Control Method of Intermittent Bus Lane and Downstream Intersection," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-7, January.
    5. Fadaei, Masoud & Cats, Oded, 2016. "Evaluating the impacts and benefits of public transport design and operational measures," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 105-116.
    6. Dingxin Wu & Wei Deng & Yan Song & Jian Wang & Dewen Kong, 2017. "Evaluating Operational Effects of Bus Lane with Intermittent Priority under Connected Vehicle Environments," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-13, April.
    7. Zhong, Lin & Zhang, Kenan & (Marco) Nie, Yu & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Dynamic carpool in morning commute: Role of high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) and high-occupancy-toll (HOT) lanes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 98-119.
    8. Chunyao Deng & Zhenwu Shi & Bo Chi & Jinru Wang, 2024. "Evaluating the Development Levels of Green Urban Transportation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nima Dadashzadeh & Murat Ergun, 2018. "Spatial bus priority schemes, implementation challenges and needs: an overview and directions for future studies," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 545-570, December.
    2. Oliver Linton & Esfandiar Maasoumi & Yoon-Jae Wang, 2002. "Consistent testing for stochastic dominance: a subsampling approach," CeMMAP working papers 03/02, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    3. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    4. Heiko Karle & Georg Kirchsteiger & Martin Peitz, 2015. "Loss Aversion and Consumption Choice: Theory and Experimental Evidence," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(2), pages 101-120, May.
    5. Shoji, Isao & Kanehiro, Sumei, 2016. "Disposition effect as a behavioral trading activity elicited by investors' different risk preferences," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 104-112.
    6. Muhammad Kashif & Thomas Leirvik, 2022. "The MAX Effect in an Oil Exporting Country: The Case of Norway," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Jonathan Meng & Feng Fu, 2020. "Understanding Gambling Behavior and Risk Attitudes Using Cryptocurrency-based Casino Blockchain Data," Papers 2008.05653, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    8. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Francisval Carvalho & Bruno César Moreira & José Willer Prado, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1775-1799, June.
    9. Boone, Jan & Sadrieh, Abdolkarim & van Ours, Jan C., 2009. "Experiments on unemployment benefit sanctions and job search behavior," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 937-951, November.
    10. Castro, Luciano de & Galvao, Antonio F. & Kim, Jeong Yeol & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel & Olmo, Jose, 2022. "Experiments on portfolio selection: A comparison between quantile preferences and expected utility decision models," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Jos'e Cl'audio do Nascimento, 2019. "Behavioral Biases and Nonadditive Dynamics in Risk Taking: An Experimental Investigation," Papers 1908.01709, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    12. Luigi Guiso, 2015. "A Test of Narrow Framing and its Origin," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 1(1), pages 61-100, March.
    13. Breaban, Adriana & van de Kuilen, Gijs & Noussair, Charles, 2016. "Prudence, Personality, Cognitive Ability and Emotional State," Other publications TiSEM 9a01a5ab-e03d-49eb-9cd7-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Martín Egozcue & Sébastien Massoni & Wing-Keung Wong & RiÄ ardas Zitikis, 2012. "Integration-segregation decisions under general value functions: "Create your own bundle — choose 1, 2, or all 3!"," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 12057, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    15. Howard Kunreuther & Erwann Michel-Kerjan, 2015. "Demand for fixed-price multi-year contracts: Experimental evidence from insurance decisions," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 171-194, October.
    16. Choo, Weihao & de Jong, Piet, 2015. "The tradeoff insurance premium as a two-sided generalisation of the distortion premium," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 238-246.
    17. Francesco GUALA, 2017. "Preferences: Neither Behavioural nor Mental," Departmental Working Papers 2017-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    18. Fabian Herweg & Svenja Hippel & Daniel Müller & Fabio Römeis, 2024. "Axiom Preferences and Choice Mistakes under Risk," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 326, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    19. Shi, Yun & Cui, Xiangyu & Zhou, Xunyu, 2020. "Beta and Coskewness Pricing: Perspective from Probability Weighting," SocArXiv 5rqhv, Center for Open Science.
    20. Simplice Asongu & Nicholas M. Odhiambo, 2020. "Financial access, governance and insurance sector development in sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 47(4), pages 849-875, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1991-:d:1599926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.