IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1986-d1599742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Poznań Metropolitan Railway—Development Opportunities Based on Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Kotecki

    (Institute of Building Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Jerzy Olgierd Pasławski

    (Institute of Building Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

The agglomeration railway networks form the backbone of modern urban transport systems, providing safe and reliable access from home to work or school for thousands of residents of agglomeration districts. This article examines the possibilities and directions of development for the agglomeration railway of the city of Poznań, providing a comparative analysis of this system with the networks of the cities of Szczecin and Gdańsk. Each rail system was described and presented in terms of its most important features. The collected data were then collected in tabular form and based on them, a comparison was made using two methods: AHP and COPRAS. Both methods, although with different strengths, indicated the unquestionable advantage of the agglomeration railway in Gdańsk for the adopted assumptions. The Poznań network obtained the weakest result in light of the assumptions. The analysis showed aspects of passenger transport, the improvement of which is crucial for the development of public transport in Poznań, e.g., too low frequency of trains, the need to increase passengers’ awareness of the possibilities of using rail transport, or the need to create stops ensuring a smooth possibility of changing to another means of transport.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Kotecki & Jerzy Olgierd Pasławski, 2025. "Poznań Metropolitan Railway—Development Opportunities Based on Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1986-:d:1599742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1986/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1986/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xinyu Luan & Pengcheng Xiang & Fuyuan Jia, 2024. "The Interconnectivity and Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Rail Transit Network Based on Multi-Element Flows: A Case Study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-30, February.
    2. Joaquín Pérez & José Jimeno & Ethel Mokotoff, 2006. "Another potential shortcoming of AHP," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 14(1), pages 99-111, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ozan Çakır & İbrahim Gürler & Bora Gündüzyeli, 2022. "Analysis of a Non-Discriminating Criterion in Simple Additive Weighting Deep Hierarchy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio, 2016. "Combining analytical hierarchy process and Choquet integral within non-additive robust ordinal regression," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 2-18.
    3. Zhang, Xin & Luo, Hao & Zeng, Xiaoyu & Zhou, Chenyi & Shu, Zhile & Li, Huayun & Fei, Zheng & Liu, Guichuan, 2024. "Research on regional economic development and natural disaster risk assessment under the goal of carbon peak and carbon neutrality: A case study in Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Schuwirth, N. & Reichert, P. & Lienert, J., 2012. "Methodological aspects of multi-criteria decision analysis for policy support: A case study on pharmaceutical removal from hospital wastewater," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 472-483.
    5. Shapiro, Arnold F. & Koissi, Marie-Claire, 2017. "Fuzzy logic modifications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 189-202.
    6. Alessio Ishizaka & Sajid Siraj, 2020. "Interactive consistency correction in the analytic hierarchy process to preserve ranks," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 443-464, December.
    7. Goran Marinković & Zoran Ilić & Milan Trifković & Jelena Tatalović & Marko Božić, 2022. "Optimization Methods as a Base for Decision Making in Land Consolidation Projects Ranking," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, September.
    8. Ardalan Bafahm & Minghe Sun, 2019. "Some Conflicting Results in the Analytic Hierarchy Process," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 465-486, March.
    9. Jana Stofkova & Matej Krejnus & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Peter Malega & Vladimira Binasova, 2022. "Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Selected Methods in the Managerial Decision-Making Process in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Hallikainen, Petri & Kivijärvi, Hannu & Tuominen, Markku, 2009. "Supporting the module sequencing decision in the ERP implementation process--An application of the ANP method," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 259-270, June.
    11. Nikou, Shahrokh & Mezei, József, 2013. "Evaluation of mobile services and substantial adoption factors with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 915-929.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1986-:d:1599742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.