IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1863-d1597172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fuzzy LARG Index for Assessing the Lean, Agile, Resilience, and Green Paradigms in Industrial Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Abbas Al-Refaie

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

  • Natalija Lepkova

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Today’s sharp competition has forced organizations to adopt effective improvement paradigms, including lean, agile, green, and resilience (LARG). However, an assessment tool is necessary to monitor the progress of LARG adoption and evaluate its effectiveness. This research, therefore, developed an index for assessing the effectiveness of LARG paradigms by evaluating their principles and practices with experts’ fuzzy evaluations. Initially, thorough research on LARG paradigms was conducted to determine the paradigm principles and their measures and prepare a comprehensive LARG survey. The Delphi method with four experts was used to rate item measures of LARG based on a five-point Likert scale. The principles and measures of each paradigm were represented by triangular fuzzy membership functions. Then, defuzzified values were obtained for each principle and set as inputs in the fuzzy inference system ( FIS ) to obtain a crisp value for each paradigm. Next, the defuzzified values of lean, agile, and green ( LAG ) were input in the FIS to obtain a crisp LAG index. Finally, the defuzzified values of the LAG and resilience ( R ) were measured and then inserted as inputs in the FIS to obtain a comprehensive defuzzified LARG value. The effectiveness of the proposed LARG framework was validated in pharmaceutical and chemical organizations. The results revealed that the LARG index is an effective tool for evaluating lean, agile, green, and resilience paradigms for both organizations. In conclusion, the LARG index provides valuable support to decision-makers in determining a business’s weaknesses and strengths and guides technical managers to possible improvement actions to enhance competitiveness and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Abbas Al-Refaie & Natalija Lepkova, 2025. "A Fuzzy LARG Index for Assessing the Lean, Agile, Resilience, and Green Paradigms in Industrial Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1863-:d:1597172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1863/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1863/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Zhou, 2016. "Lean principles, practices, and impacts: a study on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 241(1), pages 457-474, June.
    2. J. Park & T. P. Seager & P. S. C. Rao & M. Convertino & I. Linkov, 2013. "Integrating Risk and Resilience Approaches to Catastrophe Management in Engineering Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 356-367, March.
    3. Abbas Al-Refaie & Natalija Lepkova & Mehmet Emre Camlibel, 2022. "The Relationships between the Pillars of TPM and TQM and Manufacturing Performance Using Structural Equation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danielsson, Erna & Nyhlén, Jon & Olausson, Pär M., 2020. "Strategic planning for power shortages," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Shen, Lijuan & Cassottana, Beatrice & Tang, Loon Ching, 2018. "Statistical trend tests for resilience of power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 138-147.
    3. Bo Zou & Pooria Choobchian & Julie Rozenberg, 2021. "Cyber resilience of autonomous mobility systems: cyber-attacks and resilience-enhancing strategies," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 137-155, December.
    4. Catherine Maware & David M. Parsley, 2022. "The Challenges of Lean Transformation and Implementation in the Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Sulfikar Amir & Vivek Kant, 2018. "Sociotechnical Resilience: A Preliminary Concept," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 8-16, January.
    6. Hiba Baroud & Jose E. Ramirez‐Marquez & Kash Barker & Claudio M. Rocco, 2014. "Stochastic Measures of Network Resilience: Applications to Waterway Commodity Flows," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(7), pages 1317-1335, July.
    7. Timothy L. McDaniels & Stephanie E. Chang & David Hawkins & Gerard Chew & Holly Longstaff, 2015. "Towards disaster-resilient cities: an approach for setting priorities in infrastructure mitigation efforts," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 252-263, June.
    8. Hariyani, Dharmendra & Mishra, Sanjeev & Hariyani, Poonam & Sharma, Milind Kumar, 2023. "Drivers and motives for sustainable manufacturing system," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(1).
    9. H. Klammler & P. S. C. Rao & K. Hatfield, 2018. "Modeling dynamic resilience in coupled technological-social systems subjected to stochastic disturbance regimes," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 140-159, March.
    10. Mohammed M. Al-Humaiqani & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2023. "Assessing the Built Environment’s Reflectivity, Flexibility, Resourcefulness, and Rapidity Resilience Qualities against Climate Change Impacts from the Perspective of Different Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, March.
    11. Sun, Jingchao & Na, Hongming & Yan, Tianyi & Che, Zichang & Qiu, Ziyang & Yuan, Yuxing & Li, Yingnan & Du, Tao & Song, Yanli & Fang, Xin, 2022. "Cost-benefit assessment of manufacturing system using comprehensive value flow analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    12. Chao-Yuan Lin & Yuan-Chung Lai & Shao-Wei Wu & Fan-Chung Mo & Cheng-Yu Lin, 2022. "Assessment of potential sediment disasters and resilience management of mountain roads using environmental indicators," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 1951-1975, March.
    13. Ahmad, Nasir & Derrible, Sybil, 2018. "An information theory based robustness analysis of energy mix in US States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 167-174.
    14. Alkhoraif, Abdullah & Rashid, Hamad & McLaughlin, Patrick, 2019. "Lean implementation in small and medium enterprises: Literature review," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    15. Dubaniowski, Mateusz Iwo & Heinimann, Hans Rudolf, 2021. "Framework for modeling interdependencies between households, businesses, and infrastructure system, and their response to disruptions—application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    16. Fang, Yi-Ping & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2019. "Optimum post-disruption restoration under uncertainty for enhancing critical infrastructure resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1-11.
    17. Elizabeth B. Connelly & Craig R. Allen & Kirk Hatfield & José M. Palma-Oliveira & David D. Woods & Igor Linkov, 2017. "Features of resilience," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 46-50, March.
    18. María Jesús Ávila-Gutiérrez & Alejandro Martín-Gómez & Francisco Aguayo-González & Juan Ramón Lama-Ruiz, 2020. "Eco-Holonic 4.0 Circular Business Model to Conceptualize Sustainable Value Chain towards Digital Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-32, March.
    19. Nishant Agrawal & Meysam Rabiee & Mona Jabbari, 2024. "Contextual relationships in Juran’s quality principles for business sustainable growth under circular economy perspective: a decision support system approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 47-77, November.
    20. Nicolas Rossignol & Pierre Delvenne & Catrinel Turcanu, 2015. "Rethinking Vulnerability Analysis and Governance with Emphasis on a Participatory Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 129-141, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1863-:d:1597172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.