IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1721-d1594733.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Analysis of Barriers to Collaborative Information Sharing in Maritime Logistics Using Fuzzy AHP Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Chang-Woo Lee

    (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Dong-Gyun Sohn

    (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Min-Gyu Sang

    (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Chulung Lee

    (School of Industrial and Management Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Collaborative information sharing in the maritime logistics supply chain is essential for achieving efficiency, sustainability, and resilience. However, numerous barriers hinder effective information sharing among key stakeholders, including port operators, shipping companies, and trucking firms. This study conducts an empirical analysis involving surveys and interviews with logistics industry experts in South Korea, applying the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) to identify and prioritize critical collaborative information-sharing barriers in the maritime logistics supply chain. Through a comprehensive literature review, a range of barriers was identified, and their relevance was validated through structured surveys with industry experts. The application of Fuzzy AHP, which incorporates the inherent uncertainty in human judgment, enabled the identification of the most critical barriers that require urgent resolution. Based on these findings, a robust and actionable framework is proposed to address the identified challenges, integrating insights from expert interviews and the literature. The framework encompasses strategies such as data standardization, advanced data security, enhanced service compatibility, policy and institutional improvements, and stakeholder engagement. By addressing these critical barriers, the proposed framework aims to foster seamless information sharing and collaboration, ultimately enhancing the efficiency and sustainability of the maritime logistics supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang-Woo Lee & Dong-Gyun Sohn & Min-Gyu Sang & Chulung Lee, 2025. "Empirical Analysis of Barriers to Collaborative Information Sharing in Maritime Logistics Using Fuzzy AHP Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1721-:d:1594733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1721/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1721/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khalid Bichou & Richard Gray, 2004. "A logistics and supply chain management approach to port performance measurement," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 47-67, January.
    2. Zhiyuan Liu & Shuaian Wang & Yuquan Du & Hua Wang, 2016. "Supply Chain Cost Minimization by Collaboration between Liner Shipping Companies and Port Operators," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 296-314, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    2. Weihua Liu & Xinran Shen & Di Wang, 2020. "The impacts of dual overconfidence behavior and demand updating on the decisions of port service supply chain: a real case study from China," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 565-604, August.
    3. Brooks, Mary R., 2006. "Chapter 25 Issues in Measuring Port Devolution Program Performance: A Managerial Perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 599-629, January.
    4. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    5. Felix Kin Peng Hui & Lu Aye & Colin F. Duffield, 2019. "Engaging Employees with Good Sustainability: Key Performance Indicators for Dry Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Peter W. De Langen & Athanasios A. Pallis, 2005. "Analysis Of The Benefits Of Intra-Port Competition," Industrial Organization 0510003, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Oct 2005.
    7. Harlina Suzana Jaafar & Mona Leza Abd Aziz & Muhammad Razif Ahmad & Nasruddin Faisol, 2021. "Creating Innovation in Achieving Sustainability: Halal-Friendly Sustainable Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Shahrzad Nikghadam & Kim F. Molkenboer & Lori Tavasszy & Jafar Rezaei, 2023. "Information sharing to mitigate delays in port: the case of the Port of Rotterdam," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(3), pages 576-601, September.
    9. Almotairi, Badi & Flodén, Jonas & Stefansson, Gunnar & Woxenius, Johan, 2011. "Information flows supporting hinterland transportation by rail: Applications in Sweden," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 15-24.
    10. Talley, Wayne K., 2014. "Maritime transport chains: carrier, port and shipper choice effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 174-179.
    11. Eon-Seong Lee & Dong-Wook Song, 2010. "Knowledge management for maritime logistics value: discussing conceptual issues," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 563-583, November.
    12. Richard Rutter & John Nadeau & Fiona Lettice & Ming Lim & Suwaid al Shamaisi, 2018. "Place branding of seaports in the Middle East," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(3), pages 197-212, August.
    13. Qu, Chenrui & Wang, Grace W.Y. & Zeng, Qingcheng, 2017. "Modelling port subsidy policies considering pricing decisions of feeder carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 115-133.
    14. Chen, Jihong & Wan, Zheng & Zhang, Fangwei & Park, Nam-kyu & Zheng, Aibing & Zhao, Jun, 2018. "Evaluation and comparison of the development performances of typical free trade port zones in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 506-526.
    15. Lucio siviero & Fabio Carlucci, 2009. "Competitività ed efficienza delle infrastrutture terminali del trasporto marittimo: analisi del sistema dei porti nel Mediterraneo e livello di integrazione logistica," Working Papers 09_7, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica.
    16. Jordan Schwartz & José Luis Guasch & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2009. "Logistics, Transport and Food Prices in LAC: Policy Guidance for Improving Efficiency and Reducing Costs," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 9324, Inter-American Development Bank.
    17. Haugstetter, Hilary & Cahoon, Stephen, 2010. "Strategic intent: Guiding port authorities to their new world?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 30-36.
    18. Lorena Garcia-Alonso & Jason Monios & José Ángel Vallejo-Pinto, 2019. "Port competition through hinterland accessibility: the case of Spain," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(2), pages 258-277, June.
    19. Fahim, Patrick B.M. & Rezaei, Jafar & Montreuil, Benoit & Tavasszy, Lorant, 2022. "Port performance evaluation and selection in the Physical Internet," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 83-94.
    20. Bichou, K. & Gray, R., 2005. "A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 75-92, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1721-:d:1594733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.