IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1478-d1588740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating an Alternative Governance for Phosphorus Circularity Through Framings That Strengthen Intersectoral Policy Coherence in the EU: Constraints and Implementation Possibilities

Author

Listed:
  • Teodor Kalpakchiev

    (Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Brent Jacobs

    (Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Markus Fraundorfer

    (School of Politics and International Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Julia Martin-Ortega

    (Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Dana Cordell

    (Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia)

Abstract

Phosphorus’ availability and pricing is critical for the entire food system. Transformative phosphorus governance is required to reduce the European Union’s fertiliser vulnerability. At the same time, the EU’s governance approach is constrained by multiple problem definitions and missing salient framings that could make phosphorus recovery a priority of the EU’s decision-making agenda. The article addresses this policy gap by gathering and discussing different institutional and stakeholder framings that could inform a transition to a transformed phosphorus governance. We combine triangulated methods (framing as an analytical heuristic, semi-structured expert interviews, document analysis, and conference observations) with Kingdon’s three streams of agenda-setting as a conceptual framework to identify alternative intersectoral framings of phosphorus sustainability. Our findings suggest that the window of opportunity filled by the EU’s Fertiliser Affordability Communication supports a decarbonisation pathway that fails to emphasise the potential of emergent framings supporting phosphorus recovery. We analyse these framings and suggest that a new window of opportunity for their elevation on the EU’s decision-making agenda is opening with the inauguration of a new European Commission. We propose five alternatives that apply powerful spillover framings to implement phosphorus governance that is synchronous with the commission’s sectoral priorities. We believe that an extension of the EU’s current environmental policy along these pathways can potentially contribute to phosphorus sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Teodor Kalpakchiev & Brent Jacobs & Markus Fraundorfer & Julia Martin-Ortega & Dana Cordell, 2025. "Creating an Alternative Governance for Phosphorus Circularity Through Framings That Strengthen Intersectoral Policy Coherence in the EU: Constraints and Implementation Possibilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-33, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1478-:d:1588740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luka Štrubelj, 2022. "Waste, Fertilising Product, or Something Else? EU Regulation of Biochar," Journal of Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 529-540.
    2. Bärnthaler, Richard & Gough, Ian, 2023. "Provisioning for sufficiency: envisaging production corridors," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119420, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Peter Eckersley & Katarzyna Lakoma, 2022. "Straddling multiple streams: focusing events, policy entrepreneurs and problem brokers in the governance of English fire and rescue services," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 1001-1020, September.
    4. Rosalinda Nicastro & Mattia Papale & Giovanna Marta Fusco & Annalinda Capone & Biagio Morrone & Petronia Carillo, 2024. "Legal Barriers in Sustainable Agriculture: Valorization of Agri-Food Waste and Pesticide Use Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Weber, K. Matthias & Rohracher, Harald, 2012. "Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1037-1047.
    6. Chauvy, Remi & Dubois, Lionel & Lybaert, Paul & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    7. Maltby, Tomas, 2013. "European Union energy policy integration: A case of European Commission policy entrepreneurship and increasing supranationalism," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 435-444.
    8. Guilherme Magacho & Etienne Espagne & Antoine Godin, 2024. "Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: consequences for developing countries," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 243-259, February.
    9. Nicole Herweg, 2016. "Explaining European agenda-setting using the multiple streams framework: the case of European natural gas regulation," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(1), pages 13-33, March.
    10. Raustiala, Kal & Victor, David G., 2004. "The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(2), pages 277-309, April.
    11. Heng Yi Teah & Motoharu Onuki, 2017. "Support Phosphorus Recycling Policy with Social Life Cycle Assessment: A Case of Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    12. World Bank, 2020. "Global Experiences from Regulatory Sandboxes," World Bank Publications - Reports 34789, The World Bank Group.
    13. Thomas Magnusson & Viktor Werner, 2023. "Conceptualisations of incumbent firms in sustainability transitions: Insights from organisation theory and a systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 903-919, February.
    14. Birkland, Thomas A., 1998. "Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 53-74, January.
    15. Haas, Peter M., 1992. "Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 1-35, January.
    16. Stefano Mingolla & Paolo Gabrielli & Alessandro Manzotti & Matthew J. Robson & Kevin Rouwenhorst & Francesco Ciucci & Giovanni Sansavini & Magdalena M. Klemun & Zhongming Lu, 2024. "Effects of emissions caps on the costs and feasibility of low-carbon hydrogen in the European ammonia industry," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Dirk Carrez & Marco Rupp, 2023. "A Thriving Bioeconomy Needs Better Tools for Measuring and Monitoring," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 22(3), pages 51-55, December.
    18. Jacobs, Brent & Cordell, Dana & Chin, Jason & Rowe, Helen, 2017. "Towards phosphorus sustainability in North America: A model for transformational change," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 151-159.
    19. Bolukbasi, H. Tolga & Yıldırım, Deniz, 2022. "Institutions in the politics of policy change: who can play, how they play in multiple streams," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 509-528, September.
    20. Ishani Mukherjee & Michael Howlett, 2015. "Who Is a Stream? Epistemic Communities, Instrument Constituencies and Advocacy Coalitions in Public Policy-Making," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(2), pages 65-75.
    21. Viviana Negro & Michel Noussan & David Chiaramonti, 2023. "The Potential Role of Ammonia for Hydrogen Storage and Transport: A Critical Review of Challenges and Opportunities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iris Wanzenböck & Koen Frenken, 2018. "The subsidiarity principle: Turning challenge-oriented innovation policy on its head," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1806, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2018.
    2. Marlee Tichenor & Sally E Merry & Sotiria Grek & Justyna Bandola-Gill, 2022. "Global public policy in a quantified world: Sustainable Development Goals as epistemic infrastructures [The ethics of a formula: Calculating a financial-humanitarian price for water]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(4), pages 431-444.
    3. Oliver Westerwinter & Kenneth W. Abbott & Thomas Biersteker, 2021. "Informal governance in world politics," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, January.
    4. Lily Hsueh, 2020. "Expanding the multiple streams framework to explain the formation of diverse voluntary programs: evidence from US toxic chemical use policy," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 111-123, June.
    5. Robert Kissack, 2023. "Does the EU Benefit From Increased Complexity? Capital Punishment in the Human Rights Regime," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 17-28.
    6. Nihit Goyal & Michael Howlett & Namrata Chindarkar, 2020. "Who coupled which stream(s)? Policy entrepreneurship and innovation in the energy–water nexus in Gujarat, India," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1), pages 49-64, February.
    7. Shiwei Fan & Lan Xue & Jianhua Xu, 2018. "What Drives Policy Attention to Climate Change in China? An Empirical Analysis through the Lens of People’s Daily," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Nilsson, Adriana, 2017. "Making norms to tackle global challenges: The role of Intergovernmental Organisations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 171-181.
    9. López-Rivera, Andrés, 2020. "Blurring global epistemic boundaries: The emergence of traditional knowledge in environmental governance," Global Cooperation Research Papers 25, University of Duisburg-Essen, Käte Hamburger Kolleg / Centre for Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21).
    10. Benjamin Cashore & Jette Steen Knudsen & Jeremy Moon & Hamish van der Ven, 2021. "Private authority and public policy interactions in global context: Governance spheres for problem solving," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1166-1182, October.
    11. Heidi M. Peterson & Lawrence A. Baker & Rimjhim M. Aggarwal & Treavor H. Boyer & Neng Iong Chan, 2022. "A transition management framework to stimulate a circular phosphorus system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1713-1737, February.
    12. Leonore Haelg & Sebastian Sewerin & Tobias S. Schmidt, 2020. "The role of actors in the policy design process: introducing design coalitions to explain policy output," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(2), pages 309-347, June.
    13. Nihit Goyal & Michael Howlett & Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Why and how does the regulation of emerging technologies occur? Explaining the adoption of the EU General Data Protection Regulation using the multiple streams framework," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1020-1034, October.
    14. Hernandez, Ana Gonzalez & Cooper-Searle, Simone & Skelton, Alexandra C.H. & Cullen, Jonathan M., 2018. "Leveraging material efficiency as an energy and climate instrument for heavy industries in the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 533-549.
    15. Burkard Eberlein & Kenneth W. Abbott & Julia Black & Errol Meidinger & Stepan Wood, 2014. "Transnational business governance interactions: Conceptualization and framework for analysis," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Claude Paraponaris, 2017. "Plateformes numériques, conception ouverte et emploi," Post-Print halshs-01614430, HAL.
    17. Andrew B. Whitford & Derrick Anderson, 2021. "Governance landscapes for emerging technologies: The case of cryptocurrencies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1053-1070, October.
    18. Eichengreen, Barry & Ghironi, Fabio, 1997. "European Monetary Unification and International Monetary Cooperation," Center for International and Development Economics Research, Working Paper Series qt10d518tg, Center for International and Development Economics Research, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    19. Khusniddin Alikulov & Zarif Aminov & La Hoang Anh & Tran Dang Xuan & Wookyung Kim, 2024. "Comparative Technical and Economic Analyses of Hydrogen-Based Steel and Power Sectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-30, March.
    20. Jeanie Bukowski, 2017. "A “new water culture†on the Iberian Peninsula? Evaluating epistemic community impact on water resources management policy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(2), pages 239-264, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1478-:d:1588740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.