IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1423-d1587235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Progress of Ecotourism Research in China: Identifying Key Areas, Highlights, and Trends Through Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Yang

    (School of History, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    School of Humanity and Law, Jiangxi Flight University, Nanchang 330088, China)

  • Dongbo Xu

    (Center of National Security and National Defense Education, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Shuai Yuan

    (New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc., Nanchang 330006, China)

Abstract

Ecological civilization has emerged as an important component within the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021–2025) in China. As a pivotal direction of ecological development, the total number, scope, and complexity of China’s ecotourism are steadily increasing. However, systematic reviews of the relevant literature have been lacking over the past few years. This study employs CiteSpace for a visual analysis of China’s ecotourism research from 2014 to 2024 in the Web of Science Core Collections (WoSCC) database. The main findings are as follows: (1) Ecotourism research in China can be categorized into three development stages, with research groups established at leading institutions. (2) Research hotspots include case studies, management and assessment, tourist and stakeholder issues, macro and middle policy, cultural and ethical concerns. (3) “Quality” has emerged as a frontier topic; multiple disciplines, such as new technologies, pedagogy, and social governance, have contributed pathways for quality enhancement. (4) Notable research highlights include the incorporation of new elements, comparative analyses, interdisciplinary approaches, smart governance, and a broadening governance scope. (5) Research trends show increasing depth and breadth, evolving hotspots, and a growing emphasis on ecotourism management. In conclusion, ecotourism plays a crucial role in ecological, cultural, and economic sustainability. However, as demand for the development of ecotourism increases, new challenges will inevitably emerge. Therefore, it is imperative to adopt a systematic approach, leverage multidisciplinary efforts, and strengthen original theoretical research to explore more development paths and comprehensive research on ecotourism in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Yang & Dongbo Xu & Shuai Yuan, 2025. "The Progress of Ecotourism Research in China: Identifying Key Areas, Highlights, and Trends Through Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1423-:d:1587235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1423/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1423/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heesup Han & Taeyeon Eom & Amr Al-Ansi & Hyungseo Bobby Ryu & Wansoo Kim, 2019. "Community-Based Tourism as a Sustainable Direction in Destination Development: An Empirical Examination of Visitor Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Mei-lan Jin & Youngjoon Choi & Choong-Ki Lee & Muhammad Shakil Ahmad, 2020. "Effects of Place Attachment and Image on Revisit Intention in an Ecotourism Destination: Using an Extended Model of Goal-Directed Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Yuntao Lian & Jiafeng Xie, 2024. "The Evolution of Digital Cultural Heritage Research: Identifying Key Trends, Hotspots, and Challenges through Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-39, August.
    4. Jiao Zhang & Qian Wang & Yiping Xia & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Knowledge Map of Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Ying Huang & Wolfgang Glänzel & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6201-6224, July.
    6. Ma, Ben & Cai, Zhen & Zheng, Jie & Wen, Yali, 2019. "Conservation, ecotourism, poverty, and income inequality – A case study of nature reserves in Qinling, China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 236-244.
    7. Shaoai Liu & Wan-Yi Li, 2020. "Ecotourism Research Progress: A Bibliometric Analysis During 1990–2016," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    8. Chaomei Chen, 2006. "CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(3), pages 359-377, February.
    9. Jacobus Koens & Carel Dieperink & Miriam Miranda, 2009. "Ecotourism as a development strategy: experiences from Costa Rica," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 11(6), pages 1225-1237, December.
    10. Qiang Yao & Na An & Hai Ci, 2024. "The Dynamics and Trends of International Research on Urban Carbon Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-39, December.
    11. Henry Small, 1973. "Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 24(4), pages 265-269, July.
    12. Qinqin Du & Qingyu Guan & Yunfan Sun & Qingzheng Wang, 2024. "Assessment of Ecotourism Environmental Carrying Capacity in the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Pinyu Chen & Yizheng Zhao & Di Zuo & Xiang Kong, 2021. "Tourism, Water Pollution, and Waterway Landscape Changes in a Traditional Village in the Huizhou Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Amalia Rosmadi & Wuzhong Zhou & Yuanyuan Xu, 2024. "Meaningful Gamification in Ecotourism: A Study on Fostering Awareness for Positive Ecotourism Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-28, September.
    15. Yun Tong & Li Pang, 2024. "Can ecotourism development promote residents’ environmental concern: a quasi-natural experiment from China," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 864-872, March.
    16. Qianhong Quan & Yijin Wu, 2024. "Integrating Entropy Weight and MaxEnt Models for Ecotourism Suitability Assessment in Northeast China Tiger and Leopard National Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, August.
    17. Geng, Yuqing & Zhang, Xiaorui & Gao, Juan & Yan, Yan & Chen, Lingyan, 2024. "Bibliometric analysis of sustainable tourism using CiteSpace," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    18. Ling-en Wang & Linsheng Zhong & Yangjian Zhang & Bin Zhou, 2014. "Ecotourism Environmental Protection Measures and Their Effects on Protected Areas in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Keke Sun & Zeyu Xing & Xia Cao & Weijia Li, 2021. "The Regime of Rural Ecotourism Stakeholders in Poverty-Stricken Areas of China: Implications for Rural Revitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-28, September.
    20. Lihua Zeng & Hao Li & Liyu Lin & Dora Juan Juan Hu & Hui Liu, 2024. "ESG Standards in China: Bibliometric Analysis, Development Status Research, and Future Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    21. Junhui Tong & Yi Li & Yongliang Yang, 2024. "System Construction, Tourism Empowerment, and Community Participation: The Sustainable Way of Rural Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, January.
    22. Dhan Bahadur Gurung & Klaus Seeland, 2011. "Ecotourism benefits and livelihood improvement for sustainable development in the nature conservation areas of Bhutan," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(5), pages 348-358, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    2. Serhat Burmaoglu & Ozcan Saritas, 2019. "An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 823-847, March.
    3. Yi-Ming Wei & Jin-Wei Wang & Tianqi Chen & Bi-Ying Yu & Hua Liao, 2018. "Frontiers of Low-Carbon Technologies: Results from Bibliographic Coupling with Sliding Window," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 116, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    4. Souzanchi Kashani, Ebrahim & Roshani, Saeed, 2019. "Evolution of innovation system literature: Intellectual bases and emerging trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 68-80.
    5. Zhichao Wang & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2021. "Performance Analysis of Hospitals in Australia and its Peers: A Systematic Review," CEPA Working Papers Series WP012021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    6. Jianhua Hou, 2017. "Exploration into the evolution and historical roots of citation analysis by referenced publication year spectroscopy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1437-1452, March.
    7. Shuo Xu & Liyuan Hao & Xin An & Hongshen Pang & Ting Li, 2020. "Review on emerging research topics with key-route main path analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 607-624, January.
    8. Jiaxing Jiang & Lin Fan, 2022. "Visualizing the Knowledge Domain of Language Experience: A Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    9. Ying Huang & Wolfgang Glänzel & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6201-6224, July.
    10. Carlos Olmeda-Gómez & Maria-Antonia Ovalle-Perandones & Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez, 2017. "Co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in Spanish information science literature, 1985–2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 195-217, October.
    11. Zhigao Liu & Yimei Yin & Weidong Liu & Michael Dunford, 2015. "Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(1), pages 135-158, April.
    12. Rongying Zhao & Ju Wang, 2011. "Visualizing the research on pervasive and ubiquitous computing," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(3), pages 593-612, March.
    13. Chengliang Liu & Qinchang Gui, 2016. "Mapping intellectual structures and dynamics of transport geography research: a scientometric overview from 1982 to 2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 159-184, October.
    14. Kai Chen & Xiaoping Lin & Han Wang & Yujie Qiang & Jie Kong & Rui Huang & Haining Wang & Hui Liu, 2022. "Visualizing the Knowledge Base and Research Hotspot of Public Health Emergency Management: A Science Mapping Analysis-Based Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Minxi Wang & Ping Liu & Zhaoliang Gu & Hong Cheng & Xin Li, 2019. "A Scientometric Review of Resource Recycling Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Xuerong Li & Han Qiao & Shouyang Wang, 2017. "Exploring evolution and emerging trends in business model study: a co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 869-887, May.
    17. Nieminen, Paavo & Pölönen, Ilkka & Sipola, Tuomo, 2013. "Research literature clustering using diffusion maps," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 874-886.
    18. Toshiyuki Hasumi & Mei-Shiu Chiu, 2022. "Online mathematics education as bio-eco-techno process: bibliometric analysis using co-authorship and bibliographic coupling," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4631-4654, August.
    19. Michel Zitt, 2015. "Meso-level retrieval: IR-bibliometrics interplay and hybrid citation-words methods in scientific fields delineation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2223-2245, March.
    20. Lu, Kun & Yang, Guancan & Wang, Xue, 2022. "Topics emerged in the biomedical field and their characteristics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1423-:d:1587235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.