IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1383-d1586396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Environmental Cognition Promote Low-Carbon Travel Intentions? The Mediating Role of Green Perceived Value and the Moderating Role of Electronic Word-of-Mouth

Author

Listed:
  • I-Hsiung Chang

    (Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106308, Taiwan
    Department of Child Care and Industries, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung 831301, Taiwan)

  • Yueh-Chih Hsiao

    (Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106308, Taiwan)

Abstract

Most studies suggest that individuals’ environmental cognition can positively predict their eco-friendly behaviors; however, the process through which environmental cognition influences the intention to engage in low-carbon tourism has yet to be fully explored. Additionally, while electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) is a key factor influencing behavioral decisions, its moderating role in the context of low-carbon tourism remains under-researched. Drawing on the Cognitive-Affective-Conative (CAC) theoretical framework, this study investigates the impact of environmental cognition on green perceived value and low-carbon tourism intention, while also examining the moderating effect of eWOM. Data were collected from 457 participants in Taiwan via a structured questionnaire survey. The results show that environmental cognition has a significant positive impact on green perceived value but no direct effect on low-carbon tourism intention while green perceived value has a significant positive impact on low-carbon tourism intention and fully mediates the relationship between environmental cognition and low-carbon tourism intention. Furthermore, the study finds that eWOM moderates the relationship between environmental cognition and green perceived value, with eWOM strengthening the effect of environmental cognition on green perceived value. These findings suggest that enhancing environmental cognition, reinforcing green perceived value, and effectively leveraging eWOM can foster positive attitudes and willingness to engage in low-carbon tourism. The results provide practical implications for tourism operators in developing strategies to promote low-carbon tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • I-Hsiung Chang & Yueh-Chih Hsiao, 2025. "How Does Environmental Cognition Promote Low-Carbon Travel Intentions? The Mediating Role of Green Perceived Value and the Moderating Role of Electronic Word-of-Mouth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1383-:d:1586396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1383/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1383/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Boqiang & Wang, Xia, 2021. "Does low-carbon travel intention really lead to actual low-carbon travel? Evidence from urban residents in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 743-756.
    2. Yu‐Shan Chen, 2013. "Towards green loyalty: driving from green perceived value, green satisfaction, and green trust," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(5), pages 294-308, September.
    3. East, Robert & Hammond, Kathy & Lomax, Wendy, 2008. "Measuring the impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand purchase probability," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 215-224.
    4. Xiaohui Yuan & Yacheng Xiao, 2021. "Cognition, Value Perception and Purchase Intention of Organic Food—Evidence from China’s Organic Milk Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Xiaojian Hu & Nan Wu & Nuo Chen, 2021. "Young People’s Behavioral Intentions towards Low-Carbon Travel: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Erdoğan, Seyfettin & Gedikli, Ayfer & Cevik, Emrah Ismail & Erdoğan, Fatma, 2022. "Eco-friendly technologies, international tourism and carbon emissions: Evidence from the most visited countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    7. Jun-Ho Bae, 2022. "Developing ESG Evaluation Guidelines for the Tourism Sector: With a Focus on the Hotel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liying Wang & Junya Wang & Pengxia Shen & Shangqing Liu & Shuwei Zhang, 2023. "Low-Carbon Travel Behavior in Daily Residence and Tourism Destination: Based on TPB-ABC Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Xuguang Zhu & Yihan Zhang & Zeyu Wu, 2025. "Familiar Yet New: How Design-Driven Innovation and Brand Image Affect Green Agricultural Product Purchase Intentions in the Live Streaming Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Xiaoxu Dong & Huawei Zhao & Tiancai Li, 2022. "The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Kara, Karahan & Yalçın, Galip Cihan & Akagün Ergin, Elif & Simic, Vladimir & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "A neutrosophic WENSLO-ARLON model for measuring sustainable brand equity performance," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Islam, Zeenatul & Sabiha, Noor E & Salim, Ruhul, 2022. "Integrated environment-smart agricultural practices: A strategy towards climate-resilient agriculture," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 59-72.
    6. Baxendale, Shane & Macdonald, Emma K. & Wilson, Hugh N., 2015. "The Impact of Different Touchpoints on Brand Consideration," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 235-253.
    7. An-Jin Shie & You-Yu Dai & Ming-Xing Shen & Li Tian & Ming Yang & Wen-Wei Luo & Yenchun Jim Wu & Zhao-Hui Su, 2022. "Diamond Model of Green Commitment and Low-Carbon Travel Motivation, Constraint, and Intention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Philp, Matthew & Ashworth, Laurence, 2020. "I should have known better!: When firm-caused failure leads to self-image concerns and reduces negative word-of-mouth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 283-293.
    9. East, Robert & Uncles, Mark D. & Romaniuk, Jenni & Hand, Chris, 2014. "The decay of positive and negative word of mouth after product experience," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 350-355.
    10. Ping Zhang & Kaijun Cao, 2023. "Understanding the Uncivilized Tourism Behavior of Tourists: A Planned Behavior Model Based on the Perspectives of Cognitive Dissonance and Neutralization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Nguyen, Cathy & Romaniuk, Jenni, 2013. "Factors moderating the impact of word of mouth for TV and film broadcasts," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 25-29.
    12. László Kovács, 2019. "Insights from Brand Associations: Alcohol Brands and Automotive Brands in the Mind of the Consumer," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 31(1), pages 97-121.
    13. Yap, Kenneth B. & Soetarto, Budi & Sweeney, Jillian C., 2013. "The relationship between electronic word-of-mouth motivations and message characteristics: The sender’s perspective," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 66-74.
    14. Claus, Bart & Geyskens, Kelly & Millet, Kobe & Dewitte, Siegfried, 2012. "The referral backfire effect: The identity-threatening nature of referral failure," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 370-379.
    15. Jinsoo Hwang & Jinkyung-Jenny Kim, 2021. "Edible Insects: How to Increase the Sustainable Consumption Behavior among Restaurant Consumers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Heejae Shin & Wirawan Dahana, 2017. "Asymmetric Persuasive Effects of Gain- and Loss-related Messages in Electronic Word of Mouth," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 1-82, November.
    17. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    18. Muhammad Ishfaq Khan & Shahbaz Khalid & Umer Zaman & Ana Ercília José & Paulo Ferreira, 2021. "Green Paradox in Emerging Tourism Supply Chains: Achieving Green Consumption Behavior through Strategic Green Marketing Orientation, Brand Social Responsibility, and Green Image," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-24, September.
    19. Zeng, Guojun & Cao, Xinning & Lin, Zhibin & Xiao, Sarah H., 2020. "When online reviews meet virtual reality: Effects on consumer hotel booking," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    20. Agag, Gomaa & Ali Durrani, Baseer & Hassan Abdelmoety, Ziad & Mostafa Daher, Maya & Eid, Riyad, 2024. "Understanding the link between net promoter score and e-WOM behaviour on social media: The role of national culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1383-:d:1586396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.