Author
Listed:
- Biagio F. Giannetti
(Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University (UNIP), São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)
- Marcos José Alves-Pinto Junior
(School of Applied Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Limeira 13484-350, Brazil)
- Maritza Chirinos-Marroquín
(Departamento de Ingenierías de la Industria y el Ambiente, Universidad Católica San Pablo (UCSP), Arequipa 04001, Peru)
- Luis Velazquez
(Industrial Engineering, University of Sonora (UNISON), Hermosillo 83000, Mexico)
- Nora Munguia
(Industrial Engineering, University of Sonora (UNISON), Hermosillo 83000, Mexico)
- Feni Agostinho
(Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University (UNIP), São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)
- Cecília M. V. B. Almeida
(Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University (UNIP), São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)
- Ginevra Lombardi
(Department of Economics and Management, University of Florence (UNIFI), 50127 Florence, Italy)
- Gengyuan Liu
(School of Environment, Beijing Normal University (BNU), Beijing 100875, China)
Abstract
Universities, as hubs for educating future leaders and decision-makers, hold a crucial role in advancing sustainable development. However, the challenge of effectively integrating sustainability into university practices and student behavior remains significant. The Ecological Footprint, subjective well-being, and academic performance are three critical dimensions that, when evaluated together, offer a comprehensive view of sustainability in the educational context. This study aims to apply a university sustainability assessment model called ’Sunshine’ to university students in a diverse sample of five different countries. Additionally, the study provides a critical analysis of the relationships among the indicators of Ecological Footprint, Happiness, and Academic Performance. This application seeks to test the robustness of the model and explore lifestyle differences among students, providing valuable insights for decision-making in the context of university sustainability. Data were collected through specific questionnaires administered to a representative sample of students, and analyses were conducted using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. The results show that Brazilian, American, and Peruvian students exhibit an unsustainable lifestyle, requiring more than one planet to support their consumption habits. However, they are considered happy and perform well academically. These students were classified as environmentally distracted, highlighting a disconnect between their environmental awareness and practices. Chinese students showed a high ecological footprint, contrasting with the Italian group, which had an ecological footprint below one planet. However, both groups presented similar results, with low happiness indices and high academic performance. On the other hand, the group of Mexican students was the most sustainable, achieving acceptable levels in all three sustainability indicators. The analyses revealed that academic performance is related to happiness in some groups but not happiness in Ecological Footprint. This study significantly contributes by testing and validating the model in a multicultural and diverse sample, offering insights that can guide institutional policies to promote sustainability in the university environment.
Suggested Citation
Biagio F. Giannetti & Marcos José Alves-Pinto Junior & Maritza Chirinos-Marroquín & Luis Velazquez & Nora Munguia & Feni Agostinho & Cecília M. V. B. Almeida & Ginevra Lombardi & Gengyuan Liu, 2025.
"Sustainability in Universities: The Triad of Ecological Footprint, Happiness, and Academic Performance Among Brazilian and International Students,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:950-:d:1576096
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:950-:d:1576096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.