IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1331-d1585108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification and Prioritization of Critical Success Factors of a Lean Six Sigma–Industry 4.0 Integrated Framework for Sustainable Manufacturing Using TOPSIS

Author

Listed:
  • Arish Ibrahim

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (BITS Pilani), Dubai Campus, Dubai 345055, United Arab Emirates)

  • Gulshan Kumar

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (BITS Pilani), Dubai Campus, Dubai 345055, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

The relationship between Lean Six Sigma, Industry 4.0 and sustainable manufacturing has been evaluated only to a limited extent within this domain of the published literature. A DMAIC-DMADV-based framework along with a phase-by-phase implementation path is proposed in this study to integrate Lean Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 technologies for achieving sustainable manufacturing. The paper also focused on identifying and prioritizing the critical success factors for the implementation of the proposed framework. The critical success factors identified through a literature review are ranked using the multi-decision criteria technique TOPSIS, with input from selected experts across various manufacturing companies. The results highlight that the most important enablers set clear sustainability goals, regularly monitor progress and have a skilled workforce. The findings provide actionable guidance for practitioners, and the study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by offering a comprehensive methodology to integrate Lean Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 for sustainable manufacturing. Further research must focus on the validation of the framework in diverse industrial settings and refining the sustainability assessment model to enhance its adaptability.

Suggested Citation

  • Arish Ibrahim & Gulshan Kumar, 2025. "Identification and Prioritization of Critical Success Factors of a Lean Six Sigma–Industry 4.0 Integrated Framework for Sustainable Manufacturing Using TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1331-:d:1585108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1331/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1331/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karishma M. Qureshi & Bhavesh G. Mewada & Mohanad Kamil Buniya & Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi, 2023. "Analyzing Critical Success Factors of Lean 4.0 Implementation in Small and Medium Enterprises for Sustainable Manufacturing Supply Chain for Industry 4.0 Using PLS-SEM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Yeu-Shiang Huang & Wei-Hao Li, 2012. "A Study on Aggregation of TOPSIS Ideal Solutions for Group Decision-Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 461-473, July.
    3. Xi Vincent Wang & Lihui Wang, 2019. "Digital twin-based WEEE recycling, recovery and remanufacturing in the background of Industry 4.0," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(12), pages 3892-3902, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Ziyue & Huang, Lizhen, 2021. "Digital twins for information-sharing in remanufacturing supply chain: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Zhang Yu & Muhammad Umar & S. Abdul Rehman, 2022. "Adoption of technological innovation and recycling practices in automobile sector: under the Covid-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 298-306, June.
    3. Özden Tozanlı & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2020. "Evaluation of Waste Electronic Product Trade-in Strategies in Predictive Twin Disassembly Systems in the Era of Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-33, July.
    4. Kendrik Yan Hong Lim & Pai Zheng & Chun-Hsien Chen, 2020. "A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin: techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1313-1337, August.
    5. Yi Lixin & Cheng Ke & Cao Xiaoying & Sun Yueling & Cheng Xiaoqing & He Ye, 2017. "Analysis of social vulnerability of residential community to hazards in Tianjin, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 1223-1243, June.
    6. Hendrik Haße & Hendrik Valk & Frederik Möller & Boris Otto, 2022. "Design Principles for Shared Digital Twins in Distributed Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 751-772, December.
    7. Sureeyatanapas, Panitas & Sriwattananusart, Kawinpob & Niyamosoth, Thanawath & Sessomboon, Weerapat & Arunyanart, Sirawadee, 2018. "Supplier selection towards uncertain and unavailable information: An extension of TOPSIS method," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 69-79.
    8. Fu, Yelin & Lai, Kin Keung & Yu, Lean, 2021. "Multi-nation comparisons of energy architecture performance: A group decision-making method with preference structure and acceptability analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Terje Andersen & Bjørn Jæger & Alok Mishra, 2020. "Circularity in Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive. Comparison of a Manufacturer’s Danish and Norwegian Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Hsu-Shih Shih, 2016. "A Mixed-Data Evaluation in Group TOPSIS with Differentiated Decision Power," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 537-565, May.
    11. Mirela Cătălina Türkeș & Cristian-Silviu Bănacu & Laurențiu Stoenică, 2024. "The Effect of Supply Chain Sustainability Practices on Romanian SME Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Kazancoglu, Yigit & Sezer, Muruvvet Deniz & Ozkan-Ozen, Yesim Deniz & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Kumar, Ajay, 2021. "Industry 4.0 impacts on responsible environmental and societal management in the family business," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Zbigniew Korzeb & Reyes Samaniego-Medina, 2019. "Sustainability Performance. A Comparative Analysis in the Polish Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Saporiti, Nicolò & Cannas, Violetta Giada & Pozzi, Rossella & Rossi, Tommaso, 2023. "Challenges and countermeasures for digital twin implementation in manufacturing plants: A Delphi study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    15. Alok Yadav & Anish Sachdeva & Rajiv Kumar Garg & Karishma M. Qureshi & Bhavesh G. Mewada & Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi & Mohamed Mansour, 2024. "Achieving Net-Zero in the Manufacturing Supply Chain through Carbon Capture and LCA: A Comprehensive Framework with BWM-Fuzzy DEMATEL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Teng, Sin Yong & Touš, Michal & Leong, Wei Dong & How, Bing Shen & Lam, Hon Loong & Máša, Vítězslav, 2021. "Recent advances on industrial data-driven energy savings: Digital twins and infrastructures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Mar Llorente-Marrón & Montserrat Díaz-Fernández & Paz Méndez-Rodríguez & Rosario González Arias, 2020. "Social Vulnerability, Gender and Disasters. The Case of Haiti in 2010," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Rantala, Tero & Ukko, Juhani & Nasiri, Mina & Saunila, Minna, 2023. "Shifting focus of value creation through industrial digital twins—From internal application to ecosystem-level utilization," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    19. Xiaodong Zhu & Wei Li, 2020. "Research on the Pricing Strategy of “Internet +” Recycling Platforms in a Two-Sided Network Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Kübra Akyol Özcan, 2023. "Sustainability Ranking of Turkish Universities with Different Weighting Approaches and the TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1331-:d:1585108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.