Author
Listed:
- Xingmin Yin
(School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)
- Haitao Xia
(School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)
- Xiaochen Zheng
(Business School, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha 410205, China)
Abstract
Pension benefit adjustment is an effective measure to ensure the basic living standards of retirees, improve people’s livelihood, and maintain social harmony and stability. This study uses the entropy weight TOPSIS method to measure and evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of pension benefit adjustment policy in 31 provinces in China from three dimensions of sustainability, guarantee, and fairness. The Dagum Gini coefficient is used to analyze the pension benefit adjustment effects in China’s four major regions and the sources of differences among the three subsystems. Finally, the dynamic evolution of the effect of pension benefit adjustment was analyzed using kernel density estimation. The following conclusions were achieved: (1) Sustainability indicator scores are declining, while guarantee and fairness indicator scores are both on the rise, indicating that provinces are placing greater emphasis on fairness and ensuring the basic living standards of retirees in pension benefit adjustments; (2) The overall variation in the impact of pension benefit adjustments is decreasing, with regional disparities being the primary source of overall variance; (3) Pension benefits in the eastern region have increased significantly, while there are significant variations among provinces in the central and western regions. The adjustment effect for pension benefits in the northeastern region is poor and requires further enhancement. These findings provide valuable policy basis for achieving the sustainability, guarantee, and fairness of pension funds.
Suggested Citation
Xingmin Yin & Haitao Xia & Xiaochen Zheng, 2025.
"An Evaluation of China’s Basic Pension Insurance Benefit Adjustment Policy to Ensure Sustainability, Guarantee, and Fairness,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1313-:d:1584778
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1313-:d:1584778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.