IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1152-d1581048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Carbon Disclosure Levels Affect Analyst Forecasts? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jihong Shao

    (School of Economics and Management, Changsha Institute of Science and Technology, Changsha 410076, China)

  • Yuan Wu

    (Faculty of Accounting, Guangdong Baiyun University, Guangzhou 510450, China)

  • Ze Ye

    (School of Economics and Management, Changsha Institute of Science and Technology, Changsha 410076, China)

Abstract

We examine the relationship between the level of carbon disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy using firm-level data of listed companies in China. We use the reports issued by listed companies, such as financial reports, CSR reports ESG reports, carbon information on company websites, and other relevant reports to proxy for disclosure of carbon information. We find that the level of carbon disclosure is associated with lower analyst forecast error. Further analysis reveals that carbon disclosure levels enhances corporate transparency, which in turn reduces analyst forecast error. The relationship is also stronger for firms that are heavy polluters and have less competitive markets, suggesting that carbon disclosure levels play a role complementary to financial disclosure. In addition, when considering the differences in green cognition of company executives, company size characteristics, and whether or not the CSR report has been certified by a third party, this effect will be different. These results hold after we control for various factors related to firm financial transparency and other potentially confounding factors. Collectively, our findings have important implications for academics and practitioners in understanding the function of the level of carbon disclosure in financial markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Jihong Shao & Yuan Wu & Ze Ye, 2025. "Does Carbon Disclosure Levels Affect Analyst Forecasts? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1152-:d:1581048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1152/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1152/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert M. Bushman & Joseph D. Piotroski & Abbie J. Smith, 2004. "What Determines Corporate Transparency?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 207-252, May.
    2. Philipp Schreck, 2013. "Nonfinancial Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy: International Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 180-181, December.
    3. Henry He Huang & Joseph Kerstein & Chong Wang, 2018. "The impact of climate risk on firm performance and financing choices: An international comparison," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(5), pages 633-656, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Weidong & Gao, Xin & Xu, Hao & Li, Donghui, 2022. "Does global climate risk encourage companies to take more risks?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    2. Nguyen, Thu Ha & Lan, Yihui & Treepongkaruna, Sirimon & Zhong, Rui, 2023. "Credit rating downgrades and stock price crash risk: International evidence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PB).
    3. Kaiyuan Yang & Xiaoyan Huo & Ruyi Li & Stavros Sindakis & Sakshi Aggarwal, 2024. "Analyzing Corporate Governance Model with Chinese Characteristics and Accounting Information Disclosure: a Quasi-natural Experimental Study Based on a Special Institutional Arrangement," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9841-9865, June.
    4. Qian Wang & Duowen Wu & Lina Yan, 2021. "Effect of positive tone in MD&A disclosure on capital structure adjustment speed: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5809-5845, December.
    5. Doidge, Craig & Andrew Karolyi, G. & Stulz, Rene M., 2007. "Why do countries matter so much for corporate governance?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 1-39, October.
    6. Ding, Mingfa, 2014. "Political Connections and Stock Liquidity: Political Network, Hierarchy and Intervention," Knut Wicksell Working Paper Series 2014/7, Lund University, Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies.
    7. Hu, Juncheng, 2021. "Do facilitation payments affect earnings management? Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Jesse M. Keenan & Anurag Gumber, 2019. "California climate adaptation trust fund: exploring the leveraging of cap-and-trade proceeds," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 454-465, December.
    9. Barroso, Raúl & Duan, Tinghua & Guo, Siyue (Sarina) & Kowalewski, Oskar, 2024. "Board gender diversity reform and corporate carbon emissions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Yong Shi & Junjie Liu, 2025. "How Climate Risk Affects Enterprise Liquidity: Configuration Effects Based on NCA and fsQCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Chisazn , Elham & Noravesh , Iraj & Momeni , Mansour, 2019. "Providing a pattern of disclosure and transparency of information in banks," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 14(1), pages 101-132, January.
    12. Nurul Nazlia Jamil, 2020. "The Power of Political Connections: Review on the Impacts of Audit Committee and Corporate Governance," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 333347-3333, December.
    13. Li, Xiaoqing & Qiao, Penghua & Zhao, Lin, 2019. "CEO media exposure, political connection and Chinese firms' stock price synchronicity," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 61-75.
    14. Marek Gruszczynski, 2009. "Quantitative methods in accounting research," Working Papers 40, Department of Applied Econometrics, Warsaw School of Economics.
    15. Yu, Zhen & Luo, Juncheng & Fan, Jinqi, 2024. "Bank loan approval standards and firms’ accounting conservatism: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    16. Liao, Chih-Hsien & San, Ziyao & Tsang, Albert, 2024. "Corporate governance reforms and voluntary disclosure: International evidence on management earnings forecasts," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    17. Weifeng Xu & Qingsong Ruan & Chang Liu, 2019. "Can the Famous University Experience of Top Managers Improve Corporate Performance? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Boubaker, Sabri & Labégorre, Florence, 2008. "Ownership structure, corporate governance and analyst following: A study of French listed firms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 961-976, June.
    19. O'Toole, Conor M. & Morgenroth, Edgar L.W. & Ha, Thuy T., 2016. "Investment efficiency, state-owned enterprises and privatisation: Evidence from Viet Nam in Transition," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 93-108.
    20. Saad, Mohsen & Samet, Anis, 2020. "Collectivism and commonality in liquidity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 137-162.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1152-:d:1581048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.