IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p614-d1567058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Perceptions of Resilient Design Characteristics in Urban Form

Author

Listed:
  • Shuai Yuan

    (School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia)

  • Nor Zarifah Maliki

    (School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia)

  • Heng Cui

    (School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia)

Abstract

Resilient design, as a strategy to address various disruptions and pressures, remains poorly understood among the public, which hinders its effectiveness. This study aims to explore how physical elements in urban form, environmental stimuli, and individual attributes influence public perception of resilient design characteristics. A video questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate these perceptions. Results indicate that physical elements—such as road signs, social service facilities, road infrastructure, accessibility to the center, accessible green spaces, diversified activity areas, and disability facilities—negatively impact public perception of resilient design. Conversely, environmental stimuli, including fast/slow, qualitative/quantitative, and short-term changes, positively influence these perceptions. Additionally, the findings reveal that older individuals, those with lower levels of education, and individuals who have had contact with the area for less than three years exhibit weaker perceptions of resilient design characteristics. The study proposes strategies for optimizing resilient design from the perspectives of physical elements and environmental stimuli, while also recommending that future research focus on groups with limited perceptions of resilient design characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuai Yuan & Nor Zarifah Maliki & Heng Cui, 2025. "Public Perceptions of Resilient Design Characteristics in Urban Form," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:614-:d:1567058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/614/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/614/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:614-:d:1567058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.