IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p608-d1566985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Impact of China’s Industry on Health: A Dynamic Three-Stage Bootstrap Model with an Endogenous Fuzzy Directional Distance Function

Author

Listed:
  • Qinghua Pang

    (School of Economics and Finance, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China)

  • Xiaopeng Wei

    (School of Mathematics, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Lina Zhang

    (School of Economics and Finance, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China)

  • Yanjie Shang

    (School of Management, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou 213022, China)

Abstract

Evaluating the industrial eco-system is essential for promoting resource efficiency, environmental development, and public health protection. However, traditional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methods are prone to biases and rely on precise numerical values, which pose significant challenges when evaluating the industrial ecosystem in China, particularly given the prevalent data uncertainties and environmental complexities. Additionally, DEA models are typically static, fail to capture the long-term trends and dynamic characteristics of the industrial ecosystem. To address these issues, this study proposes a dynamic three-stage model with an endogenous fuzzy directional distance function. The model integrates the generalized smooth bootstrap method and fuzzy comparison techniques to correct errors and account for data uncertainties, improving the accuracy and scientific validity of eco-efficiency assessments. Chinese enterprises face challenges such as excessive resource consumption, environmental pollution, and health risks, necessitating a more comprehensive and flexible evaluation system to adapt to the complex and dynamic nature of the industrial ecosystem. By focusing on industrial production, environmental governance, and health threats (IPEGHT) in China, the research aims to provide a robust framework for enhancing industrial eco-efficiency in a dynamic and uncertain environment. The results show: (1) The proposed method for selecting endogenous direction vectors is applied to the industrial production stage, thereby identifying the subsequent improvement directions for industrial production in various provinces. (2) The idea of integration is adopted to introduce the generalized smooth bootstrap method and fuzzy mathematics, to conduct a precise and comprehensive evaluation of the IPEGHT industrial eco-system. (3) From 2011 to 2021, China’s IPEGHT industrial eco-system efficiency showed a step-like distribution, and attention needs to be paid to environmental governance. The proposed method’ application can facilitate the integration of DEA and fuzzy mathematics, and fosters a more sustainable industrial eco-system.

Suggested Citation

  • Qinghua Pang & Xiaopeng Wei & Lina Zhang & Yanjie Shang, 2025. "Assessing the Impact of China’s Industry on Health: A Dynamic Three-Stage Bootstrap Model with an Endogenous Fuzzy Directional Distance Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:608-:d:1566985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/608/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/608/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leopold Simar & Paul Wilson, 2000. "A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 779-802.
    2. Léopold Simar & Paul Wilson, 2011. "Inference by the m out of n bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 33-53, August.
    3. Léopold Simar & Paul W. Wilson, 1998. "Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 49-61, January.
    4. Hirofumi Fukuyama & William Weber, 2015. "Measuring Japanese bank performance: a dynamic network DEA approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 249-264, December.
    5. Sebastián Lozano & Narges Soltani, 2018. "DEA target setting using lexicographic and endogenous directional distance function approaches," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 55-70, October.
    6. Léopold Simar & Paul W. Wilson, 2015. "Statistical Approaches for Non-parametric Frontier Models: A Guided Tour," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(1), pages 77-110, April.
    7. Krüger, Jens & Hampf, Benjamin, 2015. "Optimal Directions for Directional Distance Functions: An Exploration of Potential Reductions of Greenhouse Gases," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 77007, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    8. Simar, Léopold & Vanhems, Anne & Wilson, Paul W., 2012. "Statistical inference for DEA estimators of directional distances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 853-864.
    9. Kneip, Alois & Simar, Léopold & Wilson, Paul W., 2008. "Asymptotics And Consistent Bootstraps For Dea Estimators In Nonparametric Frontier Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(6), pages 1663-1697, December.
    10. Dineswary Nadarajan & Saber Abdelall Mohamed Ahmed & Noor Fadiya Mohd Noor, 2023. "Seaport Network Efficiency Measurement Using Triangular and Trapezoidal Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analyses with Liner Shipping Connectivity Index Output," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Shabani, Mohadeseh & Kordrostami, Sohrab & Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, Monireh, 2023. "Renewable energy performance analysis using fuzzy dynamic directional distance function model under natural and managerial disposability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    12. Benjamin Hampf & Jens J. Krüger, 2015. "Optimal Directions for Directional Distance Functions: An Exploration of Potential Reductions of Greenhouse Gases," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(3), pages 920-938.
    13. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Yuan, Yan & Goto, Mika, 2017. "A literature study for DEA applied to energy and environment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 104-124.
    14. Zhang, Ren-Long & Liu, Xiao-Hong, 2021. "Evaluating ecological efficiency of Chinese industrial enterprise," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 679-691.
    15. Hirofumi Fukuyama & William L. Weber, 2017. "Japanese Bank Productivity, 2007–2012: A Dynamic Network Approach," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 649-676, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amir Moradi-Motlagh & Ali Emrouznejad, 2022. "The origins and development of statistical approaches in non-parametric frontier models: a survey of the first two decades of scholarly literature (1998–2020)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 713-741, November.
    2. Valentin Zelenyuk, 2019. "Data Envelopment Analysis and Business Analytics: The Big Data Challenges and Some Solutions," CEPA Working Papers Series WP072019, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    3. Nolwenn Roudaut & Anne Vanhems, 2012. "Explaining firms efficiency in the Ivorian manufacturing sector: a robust nonparametric approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 155-169, April.
    4. Jo, Ah-Hyun & Chang, Young-Tae, 2023. "The effect of airport efficiency on air traffic, using DEA and multilateral resistance terms gravity models," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Cinzia Daraio & Léopold Simar & Paul W. Wilson, 2020. "Fast and efficient computation of directional distance estimators," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(2), pages 805-835, May.
    6. Frederic Ang & Pieter Jan Kerstens, 2023. "Robust nonparametric analysis of dynamic profits, prices and productivity: An application to French meat-processing firms," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(2), pages 771-809.
    7. Léopold Simar & Paul W. Wilson, 2015. "Statistical Approaches for Non-parametric Frontier Models: A Guided Tour," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(1), pages 77-110, April.
    8. Léopold Simar & Paul W. Wilson, 2020. "Hypothesis testing in nonparametric models of production using multiple sample splits," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 287-303, June.
    9. Simar, Léopold & Wilson, Paul W., 2020. "Technical, allocative and overall efficiency: Estimation and inference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 1164-1176.
    10. Kelly D.T.Trinh & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2015. "Bootstrap-based testing for network DEA: Some Theory and Applications," CEPA Working Papers Series WP052015, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    11. Jens J. Krüger & Moritz Tarach, 2022. "Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Potentials in Europe by Sector: A Bootstrap-Based Nonparametric Efficiency Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 81(4), pages 867-898, April.
    12. Davtalab-Olyaie, Mostafa & Asgharian, Masoud & Nia, Vahid Partovi, 2019. "Stochastic ranking and dominance in DEA," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 125-138.
    13. Hampf, Benjamin & Rødseth, Kenneth Løvold, 2015. "Carbon dioxide emission standards for U.S. power plants: An efficiency analysis perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 140-153.
    14. Dakpo, K.H. & Vincent, M. & Boussemart, J.-P., 2018. "Spatial aggregation of land uses allocation and pesticide efficiency at landscape level A Multi-ware production approach," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277258, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. George Halkos & Roman Matousek & Nickolaos Tzeremes, 2016. "Pre-evaluating technical efficiency gains from possible mergers and acquisitions: evidence from Japanese regional banks," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 47-77, January.
    16. Alois Kneip & Léopold Simar & Paul Wilson, 2011. "A Computationally Efficient, Consistent Bootstrap for Inference with Non-parametric DEA Estimators," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 38(4), pages 483-515, November.
    17. Christine Amsler & Michael Leonard & Peter Schmidt, 2013. "Estimation and inference in parametric deterministic frontier models," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 293-305, December.
    18. Zervopoulos, Panagiotis & Emrouznejad, Ali & Sklavos, Sokratis, 2019. "A Bayesian approach for correcting bias of data envelopment analysis estimators," MPRA Paper 91886, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Changhee Kim & Soo Wook Kim & Hee Jay Kang & Seung-Min Song, 2017. "What Makes Urban Transportation Efficient? Evidence from Subway Transfer Stations in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Mette Asmild & Jens Hougaard & Dorte Kronborg, 2013. "Do efficiency scores depend on input mix? A statistical test and empirical illustration," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 37-48, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:608-:d:1566985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.