Author
Listed:
- Gonzalo Sánchez-Tabernero
(Faculty of Economics and Business, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Building FES, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)
- Concepción Muñoz-Sosa
(Department of Social Psychology and Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Building FES, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)
- Antonio R. Hidalgo-Muñoz
(Department of Basic Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León (INCYL), University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)
- José I. Galán
(Faculty of Economics and Business, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Building FES, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)
- Carmen Tabernero
(Department of Social Psychology and Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Building FES, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León (INCYL), University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)
Abstract
One of the main challenges facing modern societies is achieving environmental sustainability. In the face of the current energy crisis, some countries regard nuclear energy as a viable solution to meet their population’s energy demands. This article analyzes the local people’s responses to a project to develop and exploit a uranium mine in Retortillo-Santidad, a rural area in northwestern Spain on the border with Portugal. Content analysis, using Atlas.ti software (version 23.0), of the open-ended responses of 55 citizens affected by the uranium mine, revealed through network analysis that the responses can be grouped into interconnected blocks. Concerns about risks to health and the traditional economy of the area are associated with a rejection of both the uranium mine and the project itself. In addition, community attitudes towards environmental sustainability, mistrust, and social conflicts among the affected population explain the opposition to the construction of the mine. Assessments reveal different reasons for this: some individuals place more value on the project benefits and their distrust of the company, while others focus more on perceived risks, community conflicts, and environmental sustainability. These findings have practical implications for the development of future energy policies. They emphasize the importance of ensuring that affected citizens are informed about reciprocal benefits, actively heard to understand their diverse evaluations of the mining project, and meaningfully included in the implementation of energy initiatives. This underscores the necessity of adopting a more inclusive approach.
Suggested Citation
Gonzalo Sánchez-Tabernero & Concepción Muñoz-Sosa & Antonio R. Hidalgo-Muñoz & José I. Galán & Carmen Tabernero, 2025.
"Understanding the Causes of Social Acceptance and Rejection of a Uranium Mine Development Project in Northwestern Spain,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:429-:d:1562585
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:429-:d:1562585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.