IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p417-d1562307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Research on the Performance of All-Solid-Waste Cementitious Grouting Filling Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Ningqiang Zhu

    (State Key Laboratory of Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Dawei Yin

    (State Key Laboratory of Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Xuelong Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Shouqian Sheng

    (State Key Laboratory of Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

Abstract

Overburden bed separation grouting is a green mining method to control surface subsidence and protect surface buildings (structures). The performance of cementitious grouting material is the key factor affecting grouting filling. Although offering good fluidity and low cost, the fly ash (FA) slurry demands a significant water supply, undergoes high dehydration rates, and lacks cementing property. These factors result in low grouting efficiency and negatively impact the safety of operations in complex-structure areas. This work developed a CBF + D series all-solid-waste cementitious grouting filling material with blast furnace slag (BFS), FA, carbide slag (CS), desulfurization gypsum (DG), and calcium chloride (CaCl 2 ) as components. Based on the orthogonal test, the basic performance test of the grouting material was carried out using macroscopic and microscopic test methods. The influences of the water–cement ratio, the mass ratio of BFS to FA, the proportion of CS, and the proportion of DG on the slurry density, fluidity, water extraction rate, and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of the stone body were assessed. The material’s hydration mechanism was analyzed by combining X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) microscopic experiments. The optimal parameters for this test were as follows: a water–cement ratio of 0.7, a mass ratio of BFS to FA of 3:1, a proportion of CS of 40%, and a proportion of DG of 4%. Under the optimal conditions, the density of the slurry was 1.41 g·cm −3 , with a fluidity of 15.7 cm, a water extraction rate of 0.107, and a UCS of the stone body of 6.25 MPa. The water extraction rate of the slurry is 67% lower than that of the FA slurry and the slurry has good cementation performance, while still maintaining its fluidity. This significantly enhanced the safety and applicability of the grouting filling process. In addition, CBF + D series all-solid-waste cementitious materials have solved the large accumulation of industrial wastes such as FA, BFS, and CS, which maximized the resource utilization rate of these wastes and brought significant economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Ningqiang Zhu & Dawei Yin & Xuelong Li & Shouqian Sheng, 2025. "Experimental Research on the Performance of All-Solid-Waste Cementitious Grouting Filling Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:417-:d:1562307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/417/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/417/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:417-:d:1562307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.