IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p77-d1553710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Managerial Competencies in Driving Industry 4.0 Adoption: A Comparative Study of Thailand and Vietnam’s Manufacturing Sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Lan Thi Ngoc Le

    (School of Management Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand)

  • Chawalit Jeenanunta

    (School of Management Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand)

  • Yasushi Ueki

    (Institute of Developing Economies, Chiba 261-8545, Japan)

  • Nuchjarin Intalar

    (Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand)

  • Somrote Komolavanij

    (Panyapiwat Institute of Management, Nonthaburi 11120, Thailand)

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of Top Management Team Competencies (TMTCs) and Middle-Tier Managers’ Competencies (MMCs) on the intention to adopt Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies in Thailand and Vietnam. Utilizing a quantitative approach with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), data from 100 manufacturing firms reveal the critical roles of Industry 4.0 readiness level (RL) and perceived usefulness (PU) as mediators in these relationships. The findings highlight that while TMTC significantly enhances organizational readiness, its direct impact on adoption intention is non-significant. Conversely, MMC directly influences both PU and adoption intention, emphasizing the practical role of middle management in bridging strategic vision and operational execution. RL mediates the effects of TMTC on I4.0 adoption intention, whereas PU does not mediate the relationship between TMTC and adoption intention. These insights contribute to the literature on digital transformation, particularly in emerging economies, by identifying distinct managerial roles and the importance of readiness in driving adoption. This study underscores the need for tailored competency development among top and middle managers to foster successful I4.0 adoption and suggests further research into organizational culture, external support, and regional variations.

Suggested Citation

  • Lan Thi Ngoc Le & Chawalit Jeenanunta & Yasushi Ueki & Nuchjarin Intalar & Somrote Komolavanij, 2024. "The Role of Managerial Competencies in Driving Industry 4.0 Adoption: A Comparative Study of Thailand and Vietnam’s Manufacturing Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-28, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:77-:d:1553710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/77/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/77/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Foropon, Cyril & Godinho Filho, Moacir, 2018. "When titans meet – Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 18-25.
    2. Chaminda Wijethilake & Tek Lama, 2019. "Sustainability core values and sustainability risk management: Moderating effects of top management commitment and stakeholder pressure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 143-154, January.
    3. Dalenogare, Lucas Santos & Benitez, Guilherme Brittes & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Frank, Alejandro Germán, 2018. "The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 383-394.
    4. Constance E. Helfat & Margaret A. Peteraf, 2015. "Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 831-850, June.
    5. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Baabdullah, Abdullah M., 2021. "Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2022. "Analysis of the adoption of emergent technologies for risk management in the era of digital manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Olumide Emmanuel Oluyisola & Fabio Sgarbossa & Jan Ola Strandhagen, 2020. "Smart Production Planning and Control: Concept, Use-Cases and Sustainability Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, May.
    4. Andrea Chiarini, 2021. "Industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: Are we sure they are all relevant for environmental performance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3194-3207, November.
    5. Bai, Chunguang & Dallasega, Patrick & Orzes, Guido & Sarkis, Joseph, 2020. "Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Tao, Zhibin & Chao, Jiaxiao, 2024. "Unlocking new opportunities in the industry 4.0 era, exploring the critical impact of digital technology on sustainable performance and the mediating role of GSCM practices," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    7. Rafael, Lizarralde Dorronsoro & Jaione, Ganzarain Epelde & Cristina, López & Ibon, Serrano Lasa, 2020. "An Industry 4.0 maturity model for machine tool companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Shet, Sateesh V. & Pereira, Vijay, 2021. "Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Gillani, Fatima & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Sadiq Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel & Farooq, Sami, 2020. "Implementation of digital manufacturing technologies: Antecedents and consequences," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    10. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Poching Su, 2024. "A Dynamic Approach to Sustainable Knitted Footwear Production in Industry 4.0: Integrating Short-Term Profitability and Long-Term Carbon Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    11. Shih-Chia Chang & Hsu-Hwa Chang & Ming-Tsang Lu, 2021. "Evaluating Industry 4.0 Technology Application in SMEs: Using a Hybrid MCDM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Cugno, Monica & Castagnoli, Rebecca & Büchi, Giacomo, 2021. "Openness to Industry 4.0 and performance: The impact of barriers and incentives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Kristoffersen, Eivind & Blomsma, Fenna & Mikalef, Patrick & Li, Jingyue, 2020. "The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 241-261.
    14. Wong, David T.W. & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2023. "The impact of advanced manufacturing technology, sensing and analytics capabilities, and planning comprehensiveness on sustained competitive advantage: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    15. Abeer M. Abdelhalim & Nahla Ibrahim & Mohammed Alomair, 2023. "The Moderating Role of Digital Environmental Management Accounting in the Relationship between Eco-Efficiency and Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Laubengaier, Désirée A. & Cagliano, Raffaella & Canterino, Filomena, 2022. "It Takes Two to Tango: Analyzing the Relationship between Technological and Administrative Process Innovations in Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    17. Culot, Giovanna & Orzes, Guido & Sartor, Marco & Nassimbeni, Guido, 2020. "The future of manufacturing: A Delphi-based scenario analysis on Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Duan, Wenqi & Khurshid, Adnan & Khan, Khalid & Calin, Adrian Cantemir, 2024. "Transforming industry: Investigating 4.0 technologies for sustainable product evolution in china through a novel fuzzy three-way decision-making process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    19. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Yin-Hwa Lu, 2018. "A Framework of Production Planning and Control with Carbon Tax under Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    20. Riccardo Brozzi & David Forti & Erwin Rauch & Dominik T. Matt, 2020. "The Advantages of Industry 4.0 Applications for Sustainability: Results from a Sample of Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:77-:d:1553710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.