IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p35-d1552837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Ecological Management Strategy of Nature’s Contribution to People (NCPs) on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjie Zhang

    (MOE Key Laboratory of Groundwater Circulation and Environmental Evolution, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yvwei Kuang

    (MOE Key Laboratory of Groundwater Circulation and Environmental Evolution, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yifan Zhang

    (MOE Key Laboratory of Groundwater Circulation and Environmental Evolution, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Bohan Chai

    (MOE Key Laboratory of Groundwater Circulation and Environmental Evolution, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Kun Qian

    (MOE Key Laboratory of Groundwater Circulation and Environmental Evolution, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Siqi Yang

    (MOE Key Laboratory of Groundwater Circulation and Environmental Evolution, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Balancing human needs with nature’s contributions is essential for sustainable development. The nature’s contribution to people (NCPs) framework helps identify ecosystem benefits; however, few studies have applied it to conservation priorities on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Here, we first proposed an assessment method on the supply and demand of the critical NCPs, including habitat maintenance (NCP1), climate regulation (NCP4), and water quantity regulation (NCP6), and assessed NCPs from 2000 to 2020. Then, we evaluated the importance and vulnerability of NCPs based on the NCP scores and multiple stressors, which refer to current and future socioeconomic and climatic factors and inter-annual variability. Finally, we identified the ecological priority conservation areas of NCPs by comprehensively considering the importance and vulnerability. The results revealed that the following: (1) the supply and demand of three NCPs across the QTP showed similar spatial distributions, with higher values in the southeast and lower in the northwest, whereas NCP4 and NCP6 showed increasing trends over time; (2) the importance of NCPs was higher in the eastern and western parts of the QTP, while the vulnerability of NCPs was greater in the central and northwest areas, with NCP1 and NCP4 recording much higher vulnerability scores (0.94 and 0.90, respectively) compared to NCP6 (0.14); and (3) based on the importance and vulnerability of NCPs, the priority conservation areas were primarily in the eastern QTP (13.68%), covering the Yangtze and Lancang basins, with key maintenance areas focused in the southwest, underscoring a significant ecological conservation emphasis in the eastern region from both supply and demand perspectives. These insights into the NCPs’ ecological conservation support regional coordination and ecological management to enhance human well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjie Zhang & Yvwei Kuang & Yifan Zhang & Bohan Chai & Kun Qian & Siqi Yang, 2024. "Regional Ecological Management Strategy of Nature’s Contribution to People (NCPs) on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:35-:d:1552837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/35/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/35/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Bojie & Tang, Haiping & Xu, Ying, 2017. "Integrating ecosystem services and human well-being into management practices: Insights from a mountain-basin area, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 58-69.
    2. Hajnalka Breuer & Ferenc Ács & Nóra Skarbit, 2018. "Observed and projected climate change in the European region during the twentieth and twenty-first centuries according to Feddema," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 377-390, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pajek, Luka & Košir, Mitja, 2021. "Strategy for achieving long-term energy efficiency of European single-family buildings through passive climate adaptation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    2. Bojie Wang & Haiping Tang & Qin Zhang & Fengqi Cui, 2020. "Exploring Connections among Ecosystem Services Supply, Demand and Human Well-Being in a Mountain-Basin System, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Huashun Dou & Xiaobing Li & Shengkun Li & Dongliang Dang, 2018. "How to Detect Scale Effect of Ecosystem Services Supply? A Comprehensive Insight from Xilinhot in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Eleonora Cutrini & Luca Salvati, 2021. "Unraveling spatial patterns of COVID‐19 in Italy: Global forces and local economic drivers," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(S1), pages 73-108, November.
    5. Qinqin Shi & Hai Chen & Di Liu & Tianwei Geng & Hang Zhang, 2022. "Identifying the Spatial Imbalance in the Supply and Demand of Cultural Ecosystem Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Jing Zhang & Xueming Li & Tongliga Bao & Zhenghai Li & Chong Liu & Yuan Xu, 2021. "Linking Demographic Factors, Land Use, Ecosystem Services, and Human Well-Being: Insights from an Sandy Landscape, Uxin in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Haque, Md. Nazmul & Sharifi, Ayyoob, 2024. "Who are marginalized in accessing urban ecosystem services? A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Cui, Fengqi & Tang, Haiping & Zhang, Qin & Wang, Bojie & Dai, Luwei, 2019. "Integrating ecosystem services supply and demand into optimized management at different scales: A case study in Hulunbuir, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    9. Wenting Chen & Yongcai Wang & Tong Li & Huawei Wan & Yuxuan Chen, 2022. "Construction of a System of Indices for Determining the Contribution of Biodiversity to Human Well-Being in the Sanjiangyuan Area: A Spatiotemporal Distribution Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Beniamino Murgante & Giuseppe Borruso & Ginevra Balletto & Paolo Castiglia & Marco Dettori, 2020. "Why Italy First? Health, Geographical and Planning Aspects of the COVID-19 Outbreak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-44, June.
    11. Meng, Shiting & Huang, Qingxu & Zhang, Ling & He, Chunyang & Inostroza, Luis & Bai, Yansong & Yin, Dan, 2020. "Matches and mismatches between the supply of and demand for cultural ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: A case study in the Guanting Reservoir basin, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    12. Li Ma & Yueting Qin & Han Zhang & Jie Zheng & Yilei Hou & Yali Wen, 2021. "Improving Well-Being of Farmers Using Ecological Awareness around Protected Areas: Evidence from Qinling Region, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Ying Xu & Lei Yao, 2021. "Integrating Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation into Land Use Optimization: A Case Study in Huailai County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Nazmul Haque, Md. & Sharifi, Ayyoob, 2024. "Justice in access to urban ecosystem services: A critical review of the literature," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Huang, Qingxu & Yin, Dan & He, Chunyang & Yan, Jubo & Liu, Ziwen & Meng, Shiting & Ren, Qiang & Zhao, Rui & Inostroza, Luis, 2020. "Linking ecosystem services and subjective well-being in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: Insights from a multilevel linear model," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    16. Siyuan He & Louise Gallagher & Qingwen Min, 2021. "Examining Linkages among Livelihood Strategies, Ecosystem Services, and Social Well-Being to Improve National Park Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Bullock, Craig & Joyce, Deirdre & Collier, Marcus, 2018. "An exploration of the relationships between cultural ecosystem services, socio-cultural values and well-being," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 142-152.
    18. Zhang, Junze & Yin, Nan & Wang, Shuai & Yu, Jianping & Zhao, Wenwu & Fu, Bojie, 2020. "A multiple importance–satisfaction analysis framework for the sustainable management of protected areas: Integrating ecosystem services and basic needs," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    19. Gaglio, Mattias & Aschonitis, Vassilis & Castaldelli, Giuseppe & Fano, Elisa Anna, 2020. "Land use intensification rather than land cover change affects regulating services in the mountainous Adige river basin (Italy)," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    20. Wei, Hejie & Liu, Huiming & Xu, Zihan & Ren, Jiahui & Lu, Nachuan & Fan, Weiguo & Zhang, Peng & Dong, Xiaobin, 2018. "Linking ecosystem services supply, social demand and human well-being in a typical mountain–oasis–desert area, Xinjiang, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 44-57.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:35-:d:1552837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.