IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p26-d1551887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time-Varying Effects of China’s Agricultural OFDI on the Sustainability of Bilateral Agricultural Trade Within RCEP Countries: Multiple Analyses Based on the Model of Trade Gravity and TVP-VAR

Author

Listed:
  • Qiangsheng Mai

    (School of Economics and Management, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Xiaoyan Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

Abstract

China’s agricultural OFDI has achieved a new promotion of regional opening to the RCEP agricultural field, and the bilateral agricultural trade cooperation has great potential. China’s agricultural OFDI has been steadily increasing in recent years. As significant trade partners for Chinese agricultural products, RCEP countries represent an important region for China’s agricultural OFDI initiatives. However, existing studies have paid little attention to the trade effect and dynamic impact of China’s agricultural OFDI on agricultural products of RCEP countries. Therefore, based on the panel data of agricultural trade between China and RCEP countries from 2004 to 2019, this paper uses the trade gravity model and TVP-VAR model to investigate the time-varying effects of China’s agricultural OFDI on agricultural trade of RCEP countries. The findings are as follows: (1) The impact of China’s agricultural OFDI on bilateral agricultural trade between China and RCEP countries has significant time-varying characteristics, and there are short-, medium-, and long-term positive impacts most of the time. (2) When the bilateral agricultural trade reaches a certain level, the role of China’s agricultural OFDI is limited, but the overall positive and significant impact remains, showing a strong trade effect. (3) The positive impact on China’s agricultural OFDI has a heterogeneous impact on RCEP countries with different income levels and geographical connections, but the overall positive externality effect is significant. The research conclusions expand the research perspective on the trade effect of agricultural OFDI to a certain extent and provide management and policy implications for agricultural enterprises to “move fast” and promote the sustainability of bilateral agricultural trade between China and RCEP countries through government efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiangsheng Mai & Xiaoyan Wang, 2024. "Time-Varying Effects of China’s Agricultural OFDI on the Sustainability of Bilateral Agricultural Trade Within RCEP Countries: Multiple Analyses Based on the Model of Trade Gravity and TVP-VAR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:26-:d:1551887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Santangelo, Grazia D., 2018. "The impact of FDI in land in agriculture in developing countries on host country food security," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 75-84.
    2. Jouchi Nakajima, 2011. "Time-Varying Parameter VAR Model with Stochastic Volatility: An Overview of Methodology and Empirical Applications," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, vol. 29, pages 107-142, November.
    3. John H Dunning, 1988. "The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 19(1), pages 1-31, March.
    4. Amanor, Kojo S. & Chichava, Sérgio, 2016. "South–South Cooperation, Agribusiness, and African Agricultural Development: Brazil and China in Ghana and Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 13-23.
    5. Li, Jian & Strange, Roger & Ning, Lutao & Sutherland, Dylan, 2016. "Outward foreign direct investment and domestic innovation performance: Evidence from China," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 1010-1019.
    6. Yafei Wang & Li Xie & Yi Zhang & Chunyun Wang & Ke Yu, 2019. "Does FDI Promote or Inhibit the High-Quality Development of Agriculture in China? An Agricultural GTFP Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Sérgio Chichava & Jimena Duran & Lídia Cabral & Alex Shankland & Lila Buckley & Tang Lixia & Zhang Yue, 2013. "Brazil and China in Mozambican Agriculture: Emerging Insights from the Field," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(4), pages 101-115, July.
    8. Anderson, James E, 1979. "A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(1), pages 106-116, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Linjie & Liu, Xiaming & Yuan, Dong & Yu, Miaojie, 2017. "Does outward FDI generate higher productivity for emerging economy MNEs? – Micro-level evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 839-854.
    2. Xiaoyu Jiang & Yangfen Chen & Lijuan Wang, 2018. "Can China’s Agricultural FDI in Developing Countries Achieve a Win-Win Goal?—Enlightenment from the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Hongping Du & Liliana Mitkova & Na Wang, 2020. "The Paths of Internationalization of Chinese Innovative Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, March.
    4. Jingoo Kang & Jeoung Yul Lee & Pervez N. Ghauri, 2017. "The Interplay of Mahalanobis Distance and Firm Capabilities on MNC Subsidiary Exits from Host Countries," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 379-409, June.
    5. Kang, Yuanfei & Scott-Kennel, Joanna & Battisti, Martina & Deakins, David, 2021. "Linking inward/outward FDI and exploitation/exploration strategies: Development of a framework for SMEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    6. Scoones, Ian & Amanor, Kojo & Favareto, Arilson & Qi, Gubo, 2016. "A New Politics of Development Cooperation? Chinese and Brazilian Engagements in African Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Bailey, Nicholas & Li, Sali, 2015. "Cross-national Distance and FDI: The Moderating Role of Host Country Local Demand," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 267-276.
    8. Khadija Straaten & Niccolò Pisani & Ans Kolk, 2020. "Unraveling the MNE wage premium," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1355-1390, December.
    9. Nataša Kobal & Roberto Biloslavo & Matevz Raskovic, 2018. "SME Internationalisation in the United Arab Emirates: Home-Host Country Characteristics and the Role of Cultural Distance," MIC 2018: Managing Global Diversities; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Bled, Slovenia, 30 May–2 June 2018,, University of Primorska Press.
    10. Chen, Jianxun & Zhan, Wu & Tong, Zhaodi & Kumar, Vikas, 2020. "The effect of inward FDI on outward FDI over time in China: A contingent and dynamic perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    11. Rebecca Pointer & Emmanuel Sulle & Clemente Ntauazi, 2023. "Smallholder Views on Chinese Agricultural Investments in Mozambique and Tanzania in the Context of VGGTs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Michele Fratianni & Chang Hoon Oh, 2009. "Expanding RTAs, trade flows, and the multinational enterprise," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(7), pages 1206-1227, September.
    13. Narula, Rajneesh & Van der Straaten, Khadija, 2019. "A comment on the multifaceted relationship between multinational enterprises and within-country inequality," MERIT Working Papers 2019-035, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    14. Tuan, Chyau & Ng, Linda Fung-Yee, 1995. "Hong Kong's outward investment and regional economic integration with guandong: Process and implications," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 385-405.
    15. Carneiro, Jorge & Bamiatzi, Vassiliki & Cavusgil, S. Tamer, 2018. "Organizational slack as an enabler of internationalization: The case of large Brazilian firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 1057-1064.
    16. Reddy, Rama Krishna & Park, Sung- Jin & Mooty, Scott, 2022. "Emerging market firm investments in advanced markets: A country of origin perspective," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Elvira Sapienza, 2009. "The interaction between Export and FDI: Central-Eastern Europe and EU15," Quaderni DSEMS 13-2009, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Matematiche e Statistiche, Universita' di Foggia.
    18. Samdrup, Tshering & Fogarty, James & Pandit, Ram & Iftekhar, Md. Sayed & Dorjee, Kinlay, 2023. "Does FDI in agriculture in developing countries promote food security? Evidence from meta-regression analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1255-1272.
    19. Rosalie L Tung & Günter K Stahl, 2018. "The tortuous evolution of the role of culture in IB research: What we know, what we don’t know, and where we are headed," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(9), pages 1167-1189, December.
    20. Thomas L. Vollrath & Mark J. Gehlhar & Charles B. Hallahan, 2009. "Bilateral Import Protection, Free Trade Agreements, and Other Factors Influencing Trade Flows in Agriculture and Clothing," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 298-317, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:26-:d:1551887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.