IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p17-d1551663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Habitat Services and Gradient Zoning Optimization in Coal Mining Subsidence Areas from a Social–Ecological Coupling Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Bingbing Hu

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Shiyuan Zhou

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Pingjia Luo

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Hao Chen

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

Coal mining activities, while promoting urban development, also lead to significant ecological and environmental issues that directly impact regional habitat quality and perception levels. The effective assessment of habitat services and zoning optimization can facilitate ecological restoration in coal mining subsidence areas and enhance public awareness of the ecological service value of habitats. Taking the Longdai River Basin in Huaibei City as a case study, this research constructs a “habitat quality–habitat perception” assessment framework from a social–ecological coupling perspective, integrating the InVEST and SolVES models for a comprehensive evaluation. The coupling coordination degree model is used to analyze the relationship between habitat quality and perception, allowing for the zoning of habitat services. The results indicate that the average habitat quality in the study area is 0.373, reflecting an overall low level. Its spatial distribution exhibits a trend of “higher in the central–southern and northwestern regions and lower in the southwestern and northeastern regions”. Habitat perception mainly presents a “multi-patch” spatial pattern. The coupling degree C between habitat quality and habitat perception is 0.676, while the coupling coordination degree D is only 0.377, indicating a state of mild imbalance in the coupling coordination development. Moreover, disordered units account for as much as 69.22%. Based on the matching and coupling coordination between habitat quality and perception, the study area can be classified into four main categories and eight smaller habitat service zones. Considering the differences in urban–rural gradient spaces, optimization strategies for habitat services based on social–ecological coupling are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Bingbing Hu & Shiyuan Zhou & Pingjia Luo & Hao Chen, 2024. "Assessment of Habitat Services and Gradient Zoning Optimization in Coal Mining Subsidence Areas from a Social–Ecological Coupling Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:17-:d:1551663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/17/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/17/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zixuan Li & Jiang Chang & Cheng Li & Sihao Gu, 2023. "Ecological Restoration and Protection of National Land Space in Coal Resource-Based Cities from the Perspective of Ecological Security Pattern: A Case Study in Huaibei City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, February.
    2. Yiting Zhu & Gengxin Sun, 2022. "Social Value Evaluation of Ecosystem Services in Global Geoparks Based on SolVES Model," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-13, April.
    3. Zihang Zhou & Haotian Li & Jie Li & Yawen Lu & Chi Gao & Diechuan Yang, 2024. "Human–Land Coupling Relationship in Lushan National Park and Its Surrounding Areas: From an Integrated Ecological and Social Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Zhicheng Zhang & Hongjuan Zhang & Juan Feng & Yirong Wang & Kang Liu, 2021. "Evaluation of Social Values for Ecosystem Services in Urban Riverfront Space Based on the SolVES Model: A Case Study of the Fenghe River, Xi’an, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-26, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuliang Li & Ran Yi & Lin Liu & Feng Chen, 2023. "Sustainable Ecosystem Services of a Time-Honored Artificial River Ecosystem—Enlightenments from the Carp Brook, in Northern Fujian Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Longsheng Huang & Yi Tang & Youtao Song & Jinghui Liu & Hua Shen & Yi Du, 2024. "Identifying and Optimizing the Ecological Security Pattern of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration from 2000 to 2030," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Qiaoyin Zhang & Yan Wu & Zhiqiang Zhao, 2024. "Identification of Harbin Ecological Function Degradation Areas Based on Ecological Importance Assessment and Ecological Sensitivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Lili Du & Yunbing Hou & Shuheng Zhong & Kai Qu, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration in Coal Mining Areas with a High Groundwater Table Based on Ecological Security Pattern and Ecological Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Rui Zhou & Yanan Zhou & Weiwei Zhu & Li Feng & Lumeng Liu, 2025. "Projecting Water Yield Amidst Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study of the Taihu Lake Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Yongyong Fu & Wenjia Zhang & Feng Gao & Xu Bi & Ping Wang & Xiaojun Wang, 2024. "Ecological Security Pattern Construction in Loess Plateau Areas—A Case Study of Shanxi Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Jun Ma & Jinliang Wang & Jianpeng Zhang & Suling He & Lanfang Liu & Xuzheng Zhong, 2024. "The Impact of Land Use and Land Cover Changes on Ecosystem Services Value in Laos between 2000 and 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Andreas Braun & Gebhard Warth & Felix Bachofer & Michael Schultz & Volker Hochschild, 2023. "Mapping Urban Structure Types Based on Remote Sensing Data—A Universal and Adaptable Framework for Spatial Analyses of Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-41, October.
    9. Longqing Liu & Shidong Zhang & Wenshu Liu & Hongjiao Qu & Luo Guo, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Changes and Simulation Prediction of Ecological Security Pattern on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau Based on Deep Learning," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Peng Zhang & Huize Ren & Xiaobin Dong & Xuechao Wang & Mengxue Liu & Ying Zhang & Yufang Zhang & Jiuming Huang & Shuheng Dong & Ruiming Xiao, 2023. "Understanding and Applications of Tensors in Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Manas River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Ziyan Li & Libang Ma & Xianfei Chen & Xiang Wang & Jing Bai, 2023. "Zoning and Management of Ecological Restoration from the Perspective of Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand: A Case Study of Yuzhong County in Longzhong Loess Hilly Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Beiling Chen & Jianhua Zhu & Huayan Liu & Lixiong Zeng & Fuhua Li & Zhiyan Xiao & Wenfa Xiao, 2024. "Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Ecosystem Services in the Wuhan Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:17-:d:1551663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.