IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1755-d1506736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Ecosystem Services in the Wuhan Metropolitan Area

Author

Listed:
  • Beiling Chen

    (Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Jianhua Zhu

    (Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China
    Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    Scientific and Technological Collaborative Innovation Centre for the Yangtze River Economic Belt Ecological Conservation, Beijing 100091, China
    Forestry and Grassland Carbon Sink Research Institute, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Huayan Liu

    (Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Lixiong Zeng

    (Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China
    Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    Scientific and Technological Collaborative Innovation Centre for the Yangtze River Economic Belt Ecological Conservation, Beijing 100091, China
    Forestry and Grassland Carbon Sink Research Institute, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Fuhua Li

    (Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Zhiyan Xiao

    (Wuhan Forestry Station, Wuhan Garden and Forestry Bureau, Wuhan 430023, China)

  • Wenfa Xiao

    (Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China
    Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    Scientific and Technological Collaborative Innovation Centre for the Yangtze River Economic Belt Ecological Conservation, Beijing 100091, China
    Forestry and Grassland Carbon Sink Research Institute, Beijing 100091, China)

Abstract

Rapid urbanization has affected ecosystem stability, and the construction of ecological security patterns (ESPs) can rationally allocate resources and achieve ecological protection. Priority evaluation of critical areas can maximize the benefits of ecological protection, which is crucial for sustainable urban development. However, most prior studies have focused on assessing individual elements of the ESP, rarely considering both the protection priority of ecological sources and corridors. We constructed ESPs for the Wuhan Metropolitan Area (WMA) from 2000 to 2020 and evaluated the priority of ecological sources and corridors for protection. The findings indicated that high-level ecological sources exhibited higher overall landscape connectivity and ecosystem service values with lower patch fragmentation. The average area proportions of primary, secondary, and tertiary ecological sources in 2000, 2010, and 2020 were 41.11%, 23.03%, and 29.86%, respectively. High-level ecological corridors had shorter lengths and offered higher comprehensive ecosystem service values. The total length of secondary corridors exceeded that of primary corridors by 1951.19 km, 650.39 km, and 2238.18 km in 2000, 2010, and 2020, respectively. Primary corridors, which connected fragmented and isolated sources, should have their ecological land percentage increased to enhance connectivity. Secondary corridors connected two independent and distant sources, providing the basis for ecological protection in the intervening area, whose surrounding habitats should be protected. This study identifies the ecological protection priority and offers a theoretical basis and practical reference for balancing urban development with ecological protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Beiling Chen & Jianhua Zhu & Huayan Liu & Lixiong Zeng & Fuhua Li & Zhiyan Xiao & Wenfa Xiao, 2024. "Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Ecosystem Services in the Wuhan Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1755-:d:1506736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1755/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1755/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Zimo & Peng, Jian & Xu, Zihan & Wang, Xiaoyu & Meersmans, Jeroen, 2021. "Ecosystem services supply and demand response to urbanization: A case study of the Pearl River Delta, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    2. Zixuan Li & Jiang Chang & Cheng Li & Sihao Gu, 2023. "Ecological Restoration and Protection of National Land Space in Coal Resource-Based Cities from the Perspective of Ecological Security Pattern: A Case Study in Huaibei City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, February.
    3. Sharma, Rozi & Malaviya, Piyush, 2023. "Ecosystem services and climate action from a circular bioeconomy perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Schirpke, Uta & Meisch, Claude & Marsoner, Thomas & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2018. "Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of outdoor recreation in the European Alps and their surroundings," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 336-350.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Shuoshuo & Liu, Yaobin & Wei, Guoen & Bi, Mo & He, Bao-Jie, 2024. "Carbon surplus or carbon deficit under land use transformation in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Chiara Cortinovis & Grazia Zulian & Davide Geneletti, 2018. "Assessing Nature-Based Recreation to Support Urban Green Infrastructure Planning in Trento (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Vasileios A. Tzanakakis & Andrea G. Capodaglio & Andreas N. Angelakis, 2023. "Insights into Global Water Reuse Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Longsheng Huang & Yi Tang & Youtao Song & Jinghui Liu & Hua Shen & Yi Du, 2024. "Identifying and Optimizing the Ecological Security Pattern of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration from 2000 to 2030," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, July.
    5. Qiaoyin Zhang & Yan Wu & Zhiqiang Zhao, 2024. "Identification of Harbin Ecological Function Degradation Areas Based on Ecological Importance Assessment and Ecological Sensitivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Yuqing Zhao & Zenglin Han & Changren Zhang & Yuqiao Wang & Jingqiu Zhong & Mengfan Gao, 2024. "Coastal Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Bridge between the Natural Ecosystem and Social Ecosystem for Sustainable Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Xinxin Fu & Xiaofeng Wang & Jitao Zhou & Jiahao Ma, 2021. "Optimizing the Production-Living-Ecological Space for Reducing the Ecosystem Services Deficit," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Egarter Vigl, Lukas & Marsoner, Thomas & Schirpke, Uta & Tscholl, Simon & Candiago, Sebastian & Depellegrin, Daniel, 2021. "A multi-pressure analysis of ecosystem services for conservation planning in the Alps," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    9. Lili Du & Yunbing Hou & Shuheng Zhong & Kai Qu, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration in Coal Mining Areas with a High Groundwater Table Based on Ecological Security Pattern and Ecological Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Wei Shui & Kexin Wu & Yong Du & Haifeng Yang, 2021. "The Trade-Offs between Supply and Demand Dynamics of Ecosystem Services in the Bay Areas of Metropolitan Regions: A Case Study in Quanzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Fuquan Zhao & Fanlong Bai & Xinglong Liu & Zongwei Liu, 2022. "A Review on Renewable Energy Transition under China’s Carbon Neutrality Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.
    12. Huber, Lisa & Schirpke, Uta & Marsoner, Thomas & Tasser, Erich & Leitinger, Georg, 2020. "Does socioeconomic diversification enhance multifunctionality of mountain landscapes?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    13. Yongyong Fu & Wenjia Zhang & Feng Gao & Xu Bi & Ping Wang & Xiaojun Wang, 2024. "Ecological Security Pattern Construction in Loess Plateau Areas—A Case Study of Shanxi Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Maxime Lenormand & Sandra Luque & Johannes Langemeyer & Patrizia Tenerelli & Grazia Zulian & Inge Aalders & Serban Chivulescu & Pedro Clemente & Jan Dick & Jiska van Dijk & Michiel van Eupen & Relu C , 2018. "Multiscale socio-ecological networks in the age of information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Shan He & Chenxia Hu & Jianfeng Li & Jieyi Wu & Qian Xu & Lin Lin & Congmou Zhu & Yongjun Li & Mengmeng Zhou & Luyao Zhu, 2022. "Revealing Spatial Patterns of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Four Agricultural Landscapes: A Case Study from Hangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Tao, Yu & Tao, Qin & Sun, Xiao & Qiu, Jiangxiao & Pueppke, Steven G. & Ou, Weixin & Guo, Jie & Qi, Jiaguo, 2022. "Mapping ecosystem service supply and demand dynamics under rapid urban expansion: A case study in the Yangtze River Delta of China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    17. Ruiz-Frau, A. & Ospina-Alvarez, A. & Villasante, S. & Pita, P. & Maya-Jariego, I. & de Juan, S., 2020. "Using graph theory and social media data to assess cultural ecosystem services in coastal areas: Method development and application," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    18. Wang, Jinsong & Gao, Dongdong & Shi, Wei & Du, Jiayan & Huang, Zhuo & Liu, Buyuan, 2023. "Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service value: Evidence from the economic development of urbanised regions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Richards, Daniel Rex & Lavorel, Sandra, 2022. "Integrating social media data and machine learning to analyse scenarios of landscape appreciation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    20. Yujiang Yan & Jiangui Li & Junli Li & Teng Jiang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Changes in the Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services in the Kaidu-Kongque River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1755-:d:1506736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.